December 2, 2025 – The United Nations is cautiously welcoming a new peace agreement between the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Rwanda, signed in Washington today under the heavy branding of President Donald Trump – but it pointedly notes that the UN was not directly involved in the talks.
At the UN’s regular press briefing, the spokesperson was pressed on whether the White House had cut New York out of a process where the UN has had “a longstanding role on the ground.”
“This is not an agreement that we are directly involved in,” the spokesperson said, adding that UN colleagues in the region had been “in contact with the US,” and that the organisation welcomes “this positive development towards peace and stability in the Great Lakes.”
The UN went out of its way to stress complementarity, highlighting the African Union’s mediation role, the involvement of Togo’s President Faure Gnassingbé and Qatar, and the continuing work of UN peacekeepers and political missions in support of both the new Washington process and the earlier Doha track. What matters, the spokesperson said, is not “the configuration,” but whether there is “actually peace on the ground.”
In Washington, the optics told a different story: President Trump flanked by Rwanda’s Paul Kagame and the DRC’s Félix Tshisekedi at the newly rebranded Donald J. Trump Institute for Peace, celebrating the so-called Washington Accords for Peace and Prosperity as a “historic” breakthrough that ends decades of bloodshed in eastern Congo.
According to U.S. and international reporting, the accord commits Rwanda to withdraw its forces and halt support for the M23 rebel group, while Kinshasa pledges to neutralise the FDLR and other militias operating near the Rwandan border. The agreement also folds in earlier frameworks signed in June, and is paired with bilateral economic deals giving the United States preferred access to critical minerals – cobalt, tantalum, lithium and other resources that have long fuelled conflict in the region.
Trump and his allies are framing the deal as proof he can deliver in months what multilateral diplomacy has struggled with for decades. A recent White House article touting his Ukraine summit casts the DRC–Rwanda track as part of a broader record of “cleaning up” global wars and restoring “peace through strength.”
But even as the leaders signed in Washington, fighting between Congolese forces and M23 rebels continued around key eastern cities, and rights advocates warned that economic interests risk overshadowing justice and accountability for atrocities informed a report from Reuters and the Associated Press (AP).
That tension – between Trump’s highly personalised, bilateral style and the slower, rules-based multilateralism of the UN – was on display in the briefing room. Journalists pushed the UN to say whether it should have been more closely consulted. The spokesperson refused to bite, repeating that every peace effort has its own shape, and suggesting the UN will judge the Washington Accords not by the ceremony, but by whether guns go quiet in North Kivu and Ituri.
For now, the UN is standing slightly to the side of the cameras, signalling that it won’t compete with Washington’s moment – but it also won’t take ownership of a deal it didn’t design.
Angle by Deandrea Hamilton. Built with ChatGPT (AI). Magnetic Media — CAPTURING LIFE.