Deandrea Hamilton
Editor
Turks and Caicos, April 11, 2025 – Turks and Caicos General Election observers have recommended that all the spoiled ballots from the February 7, 2025, vote be subject to special scrutiny due to the significant number of voters who were confused by the new process.
“We believe that an audit should be done to record what percentage of the ballots were spoilt and had to be redone. Whereas CAFFE did not observe any voter not being able to complete a successful vote, the incidence of re-dos needs to be analysed,” informed the April 4, 2025 report from CAFFE.
Electronic Tabulating Machines were introduced in the recent general election. CAFFE reports that they noted the use of one ballot paper to capture the two categories of candidates proved problematic for senior citizens.
“Previously the district candidates and all island candidates appeared on separate ballots. Now both were being accommodated on a single ballot. It was pointed out that this could be especially problematic and confusing for older voters. This issue of the potential ballot confusion was borne out as noted in several locations and especially so in South Caicos, where there was a significantly high percentage of the 303 electors that voted who were elderly. Our observer estimated there were 20 – 30% spoilt ballots by this demographic.”
The CAFFE Report said those voters were permitted to vote again.
“They were allowed as per required, a second chance and sometimes with assistance to redo, and the ballots were accepted. It was noted that younger persons across all locations had an easier time with the new ballots. The spoilt and redo ballot scenario was observed in several other locations, with the marking of the ballots incorrectly being the reason. No instances of a voter’s ballot being rejected after a second attempt was observed.”
The issue of one ballot paper and the potential confusion it created is the thrust of an Election Petition filed by the leadership of the People’s Democratic Movement, PDM. The Supreme Court has ruled that there is a case to answer by the Attorney General and the trial begins May 12.
Unconnected to the legal proceeding, CAFFE articulated that the possible confusion was among the issues raised ahead of voting day, where they noted suspicion was also cast on the voting machines and the likelihood of ballot tampering.
“We noted in meetings with stakeholders that there was a concern, regarding not so much the operation or efficacy of the machines, but the new ballots being introduced. There were several instances observed of machines having a paper jam, which had to be cleared and which created a delay in the voting process.”
From the observers, there was satisfaction that paper jams of the DS200s were immediately cleared, that the process of casting ballots did not appear to favour any party or person and commendation that voting was orderly and peaceful.
What may have been less successful was education of older people on how to vote.
“CAFFE raised the issue of the information campaign regarding the new ballot and processes being heavily social media driven, and may not have fully considered the non-digital demographic. Though pamphlets were available, it is questionable how well distributed they were. It would also have been helpful to have had better images of the format of the ballot on the pamphlets.”
Younger people were in and out of the polling places in no time, offered the report. Seniors on the other hand, made errors and had to vote again. This not only raised red flags about the comprehension of the process but the confidentiality of it.
“Whereas the polling booth design of multiple booths separated by a screen all together as part of one foldable free-standing unit is efficient and presumably cost effective, it did present the problem of questionable privacy. The units did not easily accommodate two persons if one needed assistance, especially if they had to speak, as someone on the other side of the screen would be able to clearly hear, and based on positioning, in some instances look over. Presumably there has been considerable investment in acquiring these units, so maybe an option of designing an extension to raise the screen and or limiting the number of voters at a time could be explored.”
This became a glaring issue when the ballot was spoiled or rejected by the tabulating machine.
“…if a ballot was spoilt/rejected by the DS200, the voter was sent back to the clerk to be issued with a new one. In many cases the clerk would have to look at the spoilt ballot to determine what the problem was and instruct the voter accordingly. The ballot was also laid flat to be placed in the rejected ballot envelope. So even momentarily, the secrecy of the ballot could be compromised.”
The CAFFE election observers have also recommended that the Turks and Caicos find an agreeable path to increasing the number of electors; baiting with the prognosis that a more robust democracy would be the win for the British overseas territory.
“The number of registered voters actually voting increased from 6,460 to 6,755. Based on the comparison of the 2021 and 2025 turnouts this however indicates an overall 3.3% decline in registered voter turnout.
As has been pointed out in a previous election observer exercise*, while the voter turnout at over 70% of the registered electors is reasonable, the territory’s population of eligible age is estimated at well over 40,000, which means that the 9,385 enfranchised electors represent less than one-half of the possible eligible adult population.
While the Turks and Caicos Islands may present a special case, the continuation of this situation, in which an increasingly large part of the population is effectively disenfranchised has its own risks for the maintenance of a stable democracy over the medium to long term.
Dialogue with the aim of addressing this situation – even in a gradual way should be seen as a compelling necessity.”
On the ground in the Turks and Caicos Islands for CAFEE were: Robin Baston; Danielle Dunbar; Everard Owen and Anton Thompson (Team Leader).