Connect with us

News

Quash the DMMO, PDM Supreme Court Motion heard; Judge to bring Decision on December 8

Published

on

Wilkie Arthur

Freelance Court Reporter

 

#TurksandCaicos, November 24, 2023 – It was a very bold approach by the Opposition PDM party; an attempt to have the Supreme Court of the Turks and Caicos Islands quash two already passed bills which established the Destination Management and Marketing Organization, DMMO as a replacement to the TCI Tourist Board.

Interesting arguments were laid before his Lordship Hon Mr Justice Chris Selochan on Friday 17th November, 2023 that lasted almost the entire day. Both sides of the argument fought hard in the precedent setting matter which is an application for leave to apply for Judicial Review.

Mr. Garland is also named as one of the two applicants in this matter along with leader of the opposition, Mr. Edwin Astwood, who was not present at the hearing. However, the PDM side and their legal team were noticeably supported by former Tourist Board director and former Tourism Minister, Ralph Higgs and Robert Been, deputy leader of the People’s Democratic Movement, PDM.

At the beginning of the proceeding,  his Lordship immediately reminded both parties, meaning the (applicants and the respondents) attorneys that this is just the “leave” stage of the application, to see if there’s sufficient merit to grant leave for a full judicial review proceedings or a substantive hearing or trial by the calling of witnesses and so on.

He gave the complainants and defendants full liberty to present their arguments, ably and concisely.

The judge said, I’m not rushing you because I said that. His Lordship explained that he was simply reminding them the PDM team and the Attorney General’s Chambers, of the need to tailor their arguments according to the rules relating to “applications for leave” and not a substantive trial. This is just the “leave” stages, he reminded.

Immediately, as attorney George Missick rose to his feet to commence his arguments/submissions on the application for leave, he wasn’t able to get properly started when the Senior Principal Civil Crown Counsel, Ms. Clemar Hippolye rose to her feet in an attempt to stop or halt the entire proceedings on a point of law or clause that outlined certain decisions or ruling or orders made by the Speaker of the House in support of the respondents case or defense, could not be challenged in court unless constitutional grounds or arguments have been laid out in the application before the court.

Hon Gordon Burton, current Speaker of the House of Assembly, who was named in the case for ‘leave’ was present at the proceedings as well.

However, the Judge did not allow Ms. Hippolyte to continue as he said he will hear her in detail on the point after hearing the applicant’s case in full. She will have her opportunity to address the court on its jurisdiction to hear the matter.

Mr. Missick, attorney for the PDM was then called to continue and he without delay dived directly on the point of the judge having no jurisdiction by countering it, in with his first and most forceful point argument of “no public consultation” with respect to the DMMO before passing it into law.

Misick told the judge if we take this in its proper sequence, before the bills can reach the House of Assembly to be voted on and the Hon. Speaker can make an order that may not be challengable by the Court, we must first pass the ground of our argument regarding “no public consultation”.

He said if the court accepts that the applicants have sufficiently provided enough that there should have been public consultant and proved that there was none, to meet the guidelines outlined in the case authorities he provided from The Bahamas and elsewhere, then the issue or the clause or law of the court’s not having jurisdiction to challenge the Speaker of the House orders or decision is irrelevant.

Representing the PNP Government was the Hon. Attorney General Mrs. Rhondalee Braithwaite-Knowles KC (who at no time addressed the court  during the proceedings but was present throughout) and another civil attorney, who had recently joined the Attorney General (AG) Chambers, Ms. Khadija Macfarlane.

They were along with the previously mentioned lead civil attorney Ms. Hippolyte. The Government and the DMMO support team was Hon. Mr. Speaker Gordon Burton; Ministry of Tourism permanent secretary, Mr. Wesley Clerveaux (who also provided lengthy documentary evidence through affidavit), members of the newly established DMMO staff such as attorney, Miss. Sasha Arthur and others.

The AG’s defense on behalf of the Government was there was consultation, they outlined various different meetings with key stakeholders, boards that were established and consultative forums that were set up. They attempted to fortify their arguments regarding public consultation by stating that, at a press conference the media asked questions or a single question regarding the DMMO on one or more occasions. These questions reflected public concern and were answered by officials, satisfactorily according to the AG’s Chambers.

The GOVERNMENT legal team submitted to the Judge that the complainant’s application was wrongful framed and the wordings as to what relief the PDM is seeking is fundamentally flawed. They argued that the application should not have been brought by Hon. Edwin Astwood nor Hon. Alvin Garland but by People who were really affected such as the dismissed Tourist Board staff as they fall within the more appropriate criteria of the law for “sufficient interest” in judicial review proceedings.

The defence said the two members of the House lack sufficient or any interest as would meet the law’s requirement for “persons of sufficient interest” who are entitled to apply for leave to judicial review of any issues concerning the Government.

The AG team further invited the Court to dismiss or strike-out the application because it was filed outside of the statute of limitations; that the three months had already passed when the application made it to the court.

It appears to Magnetic Media that the attorneys for on behalf of the PNP government could not adequately defend against the opposition PDM case, so, they have mounted a serious legal attempt of procedures, timing and legal technicalities to get the case thrown out.

The learned judge did ask, the PDM attorney Mr. Missick to explain to him exactly what you’re seeking if leave is granted.

Missick and Garland addressed the court on this point separately but supportive of each other by stating to “QUASH” the entire DMMO ordinance and DMMO Fee bill 2023, regarding the $10.00 that all traveller’s would have to pay to maintain this new DMMO operation.

He said this must be done because, this government failed to consult the majority or any of the people of the Turks and Caicos Islands regarding the DMMO and the $10.00 DMMO fee,  Missick said.

He spoke of all the persons who lost their jobs by the dissolution of the Tourist Board which has been in existence some 30 plus years. He said tourism is all we have, tourism is everybody’s business.

Ms. Hippolyte did advice the judge that some of the Tourist Board staff have been placed in other government departments, some were handsomely compensated and some are employed by the DMMO.

There was a lot more which could be said from this hotly watched matter and from the day’s hearing from both sides, however the spirit of the arguments put forth are well captured in this piece which gives the public an overview of the full nature of the proceedings.

The judge now has the matter and returns with his decision at 1pm on Wednesday, December 8, 2023.

News

Threats against Public Officials amidst Airport Bomb Hoax

Published

on

Dana Malcolm

Staff Writer 

 

#TurksandCaicos, May 2, 2024 – It’s confirmed, threats were made against Turks and Caicos public officials as emails announced that there were bombs placed at both the JAGS McCartney International Airport and the Providenciales International Airport; four different threats between April 26 and 29; now the lead police official is decrying the actions.

“I unequivocally condemn the actions of those who delight in creating chaos through cyberspace,” said Edvin Martin, Commissioner of Police, on Wednesday as he described the acts as reprehensible.

Flights were delayed hours and passengers were stranded as airlines moved aircraft out of harm’s way and paused flights due to the threats.  Each time, the airports were evacuated of passengers and personnel.  While many believed the calls were a silly “prank”, standard precautions were taken to ensure public safety; it meant a significant inconvenience for travellers.

The police commissioner, in his Wednesday statement, revealed that the country’s public officials had also been targeted in bogus, but serious claims.  Martin stopped short however of informing how those public figures and who specifically was targeted.

“A dedicated team of officers searched the premises and surroundings, but nothing was ever found.  Threats have also been issued to public officials.  The Royal Turks and Caicos Police Force, view bomb hoaxes and threats as wholly reprehensible and aimed at disrupting our community.”

These words did offer some comfort and context for an anxious public, though it took days for this branch of law enforcement to officially speak on the issue.  The threats were yet another smear on the country’s safety record which captured international media attention, as well.

Also coming on Wednesday, about an hour before the public heard from the police chief, a statement from Edwin Astwood, Opposition Leader, who expressed his disappointment with what he described as the air of quiet from the government.

“The individual/ individuals/ organization behind these current threats appear to know well that the Airports are critical hubs of transportation and commerce, hence making them attractive targets to cause harm, sow chaos, or disrupt societal order. This is especially amplified in an archipelago nation and one that the economy is based on Tourism. As such, action is needed by the government, not silence,” he continued, “But the Premier and his team are saying nothing and doing nothing.”

Astwood’s suggestions for a more secure TCI against these threats include, increased cybersecurity measures; Email Threat Intelligence; Enhance Emergency Response Training; Explosive Detection Systems; and Email Authentication Protocols.

Despite this it was  Arlington Musgrove, Minister of Immigration and Border Services, who was the first and only legislative official to comment. His words, shared in an update from the Turks and Caicos Islands Airports Authority (TCIAA) on Monday after the third and fourth emails included:

“We take each of these threats received to our airports very seriously. They are indeed criminal activity carried out through malicious emails, and the Airports Authority is doing everything within its power to ensure that there is increased security surveillance at its airports. They are also working with the police to crack down on these threats.”

The police are credited with taking action right away after threats were issued, clearing airports and doing safety sweeps. Royal TCI Police also provided the all clear notices in each case.

“If you have any information about the identities of those behind these hoaxes, I urge you to come forward and report it,” appealed the Commissioner, he continued, “We are collaborating with our regional and external partners to tackle this issue, our agency will also do everything possible to protect TCI.”

Continue Reading

Education

Sandals Corporate University signs MOU with TCI Community College

Published

on

Dana Malcolm 

Staff Writer 

 

Rachel Taylor, Minister of Education, Youth, and Sport

#TurksandCaicos, May 2, 2024 – Sandals Corporate University is now an official partner of the Turks and Caicos Islands Community College (TCICC) and the two will be working together to create hospitality specific courses to equip students.

During the MOU signing on April 29, Rachel Taylor, Minister of Education, Youth, and Sport, explained the process, describing it as a visionary initiative,

“Through this collaboration TCICC and SCU will jointly develop and implement training content tailored specifically to the needs of the hospitality industry covering crucial areas such as rooms, food and beverage service, field management, watersports and technical and mechanical training.”

The Minister explained that the custom-made curriculum would also be enriched further by experts from Sandals and Beaches Resorts via guest lectures.

In addition to that up to 100 TCICC interns will be placed at Sandals Resorts for experience annually; lecturers at the TCICC will also be given resort experience periodically to make sure that they’re using the most modern teaching methods.

“This is not just a formal agreement but a shared commitment to the future of our people both young and seasoned; and the robust growth of our hospitality and tourism industry,” Taylor said.

She was backed up by Adam Stewart, Chairman of Sandals Group International

“You will have 100% support from my office,” he promised

Adam Stewart, Chairman of Sandals Group International 

Stewart who flew in for the event explained that the idea for a joint teaching space had come about over a lunch of conch chowder with TCI officials, including the Governor, only months earlier.

”The best thing you can do for the people of the Caribbean has got to be education. We have seen time and time again, division by division and island by island across the Caribbean, where we invest in people, we see [returns],” Stewart said.

He highlighted that SCU is the first hotel-led Corporate University in the Western Hemisphere and now connected to the Turks and Caicos Islands Community College (TCICC). Beaches Turks and Caicos is the largest hospitality employer in the country and is currently understaffed and in need of hundreds more workers.

“I’ve never seen an MOU come together faster, I’ve never seen the private in public it to work together in [such] a way which to me signals how serious this is,” Stewart said.

The MOU was signed by Dr Luz Longsworth (on behalf of Sandals) witnessed by Stewart and Washington Misick, TCI Premier.

Attending the event was a host of dignitaries including Dileeni Daniel Selvaratnam, TCI Governor, Jamell Robinson, Deputy Premier and Minister of Physical Planning and Infrastructure Development, Josephine Connollly, Minister of Tourism, other ministers, TCICC  executives and Sandals officials.

Continue Reading

News

Attorney General wins major victory for the Government in case of unlawful occupation of Crown Land

Published

on

#TurksandCaicos, May 2, 2024 – In a unanimous decision, the Court of Appeal of the Turks and Caicos Islands upheld an appeal brought by the Attorney General on behalf of the Turks and Caicos Island Government, overturning the lower court’s ruling and affirming the Government’s position on critical issues involving crown land procedures and the implications of the Crown Land Ordinance. This ruling represents a decisive moment in the legal saga and reaffirms the Government’s commitment to upholding the rule of law and protecting public resources.

On the 29th April, 2022, former Supreme Court Judge, Hon. Carlos Simons OBE KC, ruled in favour of a local businessman Mr. Gilbert Selver who the Crown argued had been in unlawful occupation of three parcels of crown land, namely 60602/429; 60602/430; 60602/431 respectively; ruling that the freehold title to Crown Land parcels 60602/429, and 60602/430 be transferred to Mr. Selver at the 2008 offer prices of $30,800 and $73,5000 respectively. In respect of 60602/431 the Court ruled that Mr Selver was indeed a trespasser. The Crown’s position in the Supreme Court was that Mr. Selver was a trespasser after failing to accept the offers for the sale of said Crown land presented to him prior to the coming into force of the 2012 Crown land Ordinance And after receiving Notices to discontinue the use and occupation of the said Crown Land which said notices had been ignored.

The Crown being dissatisfied with the said ruling, lodged an appeal against the decision of former Justice Simons OBE KC on the grounds that he failed to properly apply the contract principles of offer and acceptance; he failed to consider that the offers made by TCIG was subject to contract, and that he failed to consider the intervening impact of the Crown Land Ordinance which came into force in 2012.

On 26th October 2023, the Court of Appeal heard the detailed arguments on behalf of the Crown and Mr. Selver. Principal Crown Counsel, Civil Ms. Clemar Hippolyte and Principal Crown Counsel, Commercial, Ms. Yaa McCartney appeared on behalf of the Crown as representatives for the Appellant, and Mr. George Missick appeared for the Respondent Mr. Selver before the three- person Appeal panel comprising Hon. Mr. Justice K Neville Adderley (President), Hon. Mr. Justice Stanley John, and Hon. Mr. Bernard Turner.

On 17th April, 2024 the Court of Appealed handed down its decision on the appeal, overturning the judgement in the Supreme Court, and ruling in favour of the Crown. In arriving at its decision, the Court found that, by letter dated 29th October, 2008, the Crown offered Mr. Selver the freehold title to parcels 60602/429 and 60602/430 for the purchase prices of $30,800 and $73,5000 respectively. The Court found that in order to accept the offers, Mr. Selver was required to pay the survey fees and a registration fee. The letter also informed Mr. Selver that he was required to

contact the Crown Land Unit in order to execute the necessary documents. The Court found that Mr. Selver had not immediately acted on the offer and had not accepted the offer of the Crown for the freehold.

The Court of Appeal also held that although the offer remained open by the Crown, time not being stated to be of the essence, Mr. Selver’s unequivocal acceptance was only communicated in 2013 which came after the coming into force of the 2012 Crown Land Ordinance (CLO). The Court of Appeal considered whether the coming into force of the CLO presented a significant change in circumstances which would have impacted Mr. Selver’s ability to accept the offer to constitute a legally enforceable contract. Following the decision of the Privy Council in CMK BWI Ltd. v Attorney General [2022] UKPC 40, the Court held that the date of the acceptance was highly relevant to determining the legality of the contract because the 2012 CLO now dictates the conditions and circumstances of all crown land dispositions. The Court considered section 7(2) of the Ordinance which provides that “Crown land must not be disposed of unless the disposal is authorized by this Ordinance or any other Ordinance dealing with Crown land”, and held that the Crown “could not dispose of the parcels under the previous offers as the Ordinance cerate[d] the legislative framework for the disposition of Crown lands, including restrictions (section 9) and imposition of conditions (sectio10)”. Applying the law to the facts, the Court found that “no validly enforceable contract was entered into between Selver and the TCIG for the purchase of 429 and 430 as the offer to purchase the crown lands were rescinded by the passage of the CLO”.

In allowing the appeal, the Court ordered that:

  1. The TCIG is entitled to possession of parcels 60602/429 ; 60602/430 and 60602/431.
  2. Selver must vacate parcels 60602/429; 60602/430 and 60602/431 within 90 days from the date of the Order.
  3. The TCIG is entitled to all attached buildings and/or infrastructural works on the parcels 60602/429; 60602/430 and 60602/431 attached to the land and no compensation is payable to Mr. Selver.
  4. Selver must pay the TCIG’s legal costs in the Supreme Court and in the Court of Appeal .

“We welcome the Court of Appeal’s ruling in this pivotal land case,” stated the Honorable Attorney General Rhondalee Braithwaite Knowles OBE KC, “This decision vindicates our steadfast efforts to clarifying the impact of the Crown Land Ordinance on some of the legacy matters that we are seeking to bring to a close. This judgement, is another helpful decision of our courts that clarifies the Crown Land Ordinance’s governance over the disposition of Crown Land since its enactment. The judgment reaffirms the Government’s authority to act in the best interests of the people of the Turks and Caicos Islands and ensures responsible stewardship of our finite land resources.”

The successful appeal outcome is a testament to the diligence and expertise of the Government’s legal team, whose tireless advocacy and meticulous preparation were instrumental in securing this favorable verdict for the Government. Their dedication to advancing the Government’s case and upholding the principles of justice and fairness have been commendable.

“The Government is very grateful to the Court of Appeal for their thorough consideration of the legal issues at hand and their commitment to delivering just and equitable outcomes” added the Honourable Attorney General. “This ruling provides clarity and certainty for all stakeholders involved and underscores the importance of transparent and accountable Crown Land practices.”

Continue Reading

FIND US ON FACEBOOK

TRENDING