#TurksandCaicos, February 26, 2021 – There has already been speculation regarding my choice of appointed members. Tracking social media I know passions run high on this and some good decent people have reached out to me expressing worries and concerns.
The last 48 hours have, as a result, only reinforced in my mind a truth that whatever ones position is on who a ‘Turks and Caicos Islander’ is – and who therefore should have a voice in the Legislature – there is a need for a national conversation on this issue. It stars to go the heart of the Islands present and future identity and it would seem to me that for so long as there is confusion about this then a properly unified nation, at ease with itself, is rather difficult to achieve.
That belief is reinforced because in every conversation I have, I do not know of a senior politician or informed private citizen, who has given this thought, who does not recognise that the question around unity or disunity, inclusion or exclusion, is a pressing issue here in TCI.
People might not agree on how it should be settled, but they do believe it does need to start to be settled. It is though very hard for an elected politician to talk in these terms publicly because of the strength of feeling it generates from those who elect them. So I hope I can play some part in catalysing and sustaining that debate over the course of this Parliament through those I appoint.
Whatever the solution is, that comes out of that conversation, it will need to be designed and managed by the Turks and Caicos Islanders– whereby – TCI can build an inclusive society particularly for those who were born here, who have yet to properly integrate, but who clearly are part of these Islands future.
I stress from the outset I offer no preferred solution, or indeed any solution. I am quite clear the issue is one for Turks and Caicos Islanders alone to resolve but what I do hope to do is generate a conversation that moves beyond short bursts of anger or frustration on social media – or quiet resentment in many communities – into a set of reflections and interventions on the floor of the House of Assembly which is where mature serious debate, on matters of national importance, should occur.
The Constitution:
I have said in the past how important the Constitution is and that whatever I do I am bounded by the law. With regard to guiding me, as to who I should appoint to the House of Assembly, Section 48 (which brings in Section 46(c)) compels me to appoint only Turks and Caicos Islanders. I cannot appoint a foreigner. If the persons I am about to appoint are considered by you to be ‘foreigners’ then you are at odds with the foundational legal document that all others on the Islands are built from. That alone is worth a proper conversation.
Linked to that it is worth saying that there is nothing, anywhere, in the Constitution that differentiates between different types of Turks and Caicos Islanders. In law a Turks and Caicos Islander is a Turks and Caicos Islander. To me that seems to be a fundamental foundation of any democratic society going back as far as ancient Greece. So within the Constitution, and under the law, every Turks and Caicos Islander has equal status. Some may not like that, but that is the legal position.
The second section of the Constitution that guides me on my selection is Section 47. That directs that my selection should be: ‘so far as possible from among persons representing shades of opinion which would not otherwise be represented in the House
Should the Governor’s Members Be Part of the Opposition:
This takes me to my first point. A number of people have suggested – from both sides of the political divide (although none of them past or present elected politicians because they have a good understanding of this point) that there is an expectation on me to appoint members who can provide an active opposition to the Government and they justify this because the Opposition benches have been depleted down to two.
I can see the ‘in the moment’ argument for this, but I see nothing in the Constitution that suggests, in any sense, that the Governor’s appointees should provide an ‘opposition’ to the ‘will as expressed by the people’. This seems to me a dangerous assertion. It is the people who have decided the relative ratios of the two opposing Benches and I certainly do not want to set a precedent that the Governor today, or in the future, seeks to make appointments to oppose the Government.
Once appointed by me the two Members of the House will take no direction from me – they will vote with their conscience as Turks and Caicos Islanders – but in appointing them I make an assumption that if the Government are seeking to pass legislation that was in their manifesto, which the people voted for, there should be some presumption of support unless the legislation is poorly considered or badly drafted.
What I do expect the members who I appoint to do is to ‘constructively challenge’, to scrutinise legislation line-by-line, and spending, and have the skill to do that. I also expect them to be able to bring real diversity of view – to help the House think through first and second order consequences that they may not have considered. I do not expect the Governor’s appointed members to be deliberately contrary, or grand-stand, but instead to be sober, wise and considered.
Respecting all Turks and Caicos Islanders.
Now to my second point. It would, I’m told via some on social media, be hugely disrespectful for me to not appoint ‘indigenous Turks and Caicos Islanders’. Of course one of the past appointed members – who has retired – was just such an appointment, non-indigenous, and I think most agree, he added great value to the work of the House.
But sticking with the broader point, for those who know me, you will I hope find it hard to find an example of where I have shown disrespect to anyone – in person or in social media – including my harshest critic – let alone an entire group of people, a group of people I have come not just to respect, but to genuinely admire. And in terms of appointing Turks and Caicos Islanders I quickly appointed a Deputy Commissioner, appointed for the first time a Judge (albeit temporarily because no long-term vacancy existed) and appointed the first Turks and Caicos Islands Resident Magistrate. The latter two are ground breaking appointments and show no disrespect. And in forming the Regiment I’ve ensured the Regular Officers of that Regiment, are all Turks and Caicos Islanders and invested in them.
There are unquestionably many ‘indigenous’ Islanders who I could appoint on merit, I’d go so far as to say there are some who are quite brilliant and some know exactly who they are because I’ve had conversations with them on this issue as I started to make my choices. But the key point for me is, because many are young, and many are brilliant, and many have big ideas for these Islands, I’d prefer they stood before the electorate than were brought into the House by me.
A Governor’s appointed member has limits placed on them that an individual with a big and expansive vision, and dream for the Islands, would be constrained from delivering. To effect this sort of change you need to be on the Government bench. I am confident that any indigenous Turks and Caicos Islander, of the quality I would want to appoint, the electorate of TCI would want to appoint, as well. So I encourage the very best of our Turks and Caicos Islanders to stand before the electorate.
Set against this I am much less confident that those of the same quality, who are not indigenous Islanders, particularly if they come from ethnic or national backgrounds that appear here to carry stigma, would presently be selected as candidates, let alone elected. I don’t criticise this in anyway, there are reasons for it that I understand. But I think the Constitution both calls on me, and enables me, to help such people still serve at the highest levels of government.
Selection Criteria:
In terms of selection criteria – I had four. First I wanted to choose those who could cover as many matters as possible that I hold Constitutional responsibility for (Policing, national security and financial services are examples). Second, an interest in issues I described in my inauguration speech (wealth creation, tourism, the vulnerable, child welfare); third, that they could contribute to good governance (so could scrutinise legislation line-by-line, or understood finances and budgets and had understanding of countering corruption, money laundering and human rights) and finally; d) had the gravitas and wisdom to hold and sustain an independent position in the House witout being overly influenced.
My Choice:
As a result, I have chosen to appoint Harold Charles and Willin Belliard as the Governor’s appointed members. I wish to also say that the one other name I have seen in social media – that apparently was my choice – was wrong, was fake news, never considered and never approached. Some of the venom directed at that individual requires, I’d have thought, an apology.
So to Harold and to Willin. Both are passionate Turks and Caicos Islanders. If you’ve met either you will know this. They have completely committed to TCI. Harold was of course born in Haiti, speaks Creole, and is well connected to the Haitian Community but he is also embedded in the Turks and Caicos Island community and there are few people I’ve heard speak as passionately and optimistically about TCI as Harold. He is the Islands adopted son – from the poorest of beginnings – and grateful for it.
Willin was born in the Dominican Republic, speaks Spanish, and is well connected to the Dominican community. But likewise, Willin’s home and his family’s future are embedded here in TCI and, as an ex-Police Officer, demonstrated he was prepared to put his life on the line, for the people of TCI, and committed to run towards danger rather than away from it for many years.
Harold Charles:
I said in my Inauguration speech that I would respect those who created wealth, and by implication created employment on the Islands. Harold has, though-out his career, certainly done that. For some time he was the second largest employer on the Islands, directly and indirectly.
I also said, in that speech that I had great respect for those who put themselves before the electorate and Harold did this in 2012, not successfully, but he provided an alternative Political Party offering something different. I hope Harold, through his actions, encourages others to stand knowing that there is a route into the House – if not immediately – by showing early courage and commitment to the democratic process. I’d certainly suggest my successor considers in the future some who stood in this year’s election – as Independents – who were unsuccessful but were of genuine quality.
Harold also clearly has an eye for finance, so in matters relating to budget I hope he can bring his financial rigour into the House. Tourism remains our overwhelming industry and aviation is its backbone. This is the main artery of the Territory’s financial life support – and as we recover our Tourist industry from the pandemic I hope Harold’s deep knowledge of this industry, particularly at a time when our international airport requires renewal, will be of help to his colleagues.
And Harold brings into the House real knowledge of our neighbouring country – Haiti – who frustrates and undermines us with our greatest national security problems. I hope he can use his influence in his community, and whatever influence he has in Haiti, to help us defend our borders and drive home the message that while legal controlled migration here is welcomed, at the pace or not the elected government dictates, illegal immigration undermines and stigmatises the Haitian community here and generates tensions that should not be present. The message he can deliver is simple. Come here legally you are very welcome. Come here illegally, you are not.
Beyond that Harold’s life experience is frankly inspirational. It’s well known in the Islands as a genuine rags to riches story generated through hard work and entrepreneurial flair. He is, I hope, a role model to all young people here in TCI, whatever their background, that it’s possible to rise from the most humble of beginnings to a position where you receive international recognition and you can serve the Territory in its Legislature. In 2014 Harold was presented with TCI’s National Honour for twenty years of outstanding and exemplary public service.
Willin Belliard:
And so to Willin. He is a former Police Officer, with commendations from a past Chief Justice and the UK House for Commons for a successful investigation into a major $200 million fraud. A highlight of his policing career is the law enforcement work, as a founding member of the Financial Intelligence Unit of the RTCIPF, to bring to justice the ringleader of a major Ponzi scheme, resulting in the only such conviction in the islands’ history and protecting the islands reputation in the financial services sector. As a result he brings the interests of front line law enforcement into the House. I hope there will now be a Representative in the House who can talk intelligently about the challenge and future of Policing and I hope the Leadership of the Police Force can keep him well briefed in this regard so he is current.
He is also an Attorney. Policing on its own cannot solve the problem of crime in TCI. It also needs an excellent, modern, efficient Justice system. The Chief Justice is leading on this and I hope Willin will help support her agenda, along with other Attorney’s, in the Legislature.
Having trained at the London Bar – Willin should also bring an Attorney’s eye to the line-by-line scrutiny of legislation. I hope all in the House commit to careful scrutiny of legislation that a Government, with a very powerful majority, will bring to the House. As an Attorney he has also worked on issues here relating to Human Rights, holding the Government to account, and I see Human Rights as an invaluable safety catch in terms of good governance as well as the protection of the individual.
Willin has, until recently, been a member of the Board of the Financial Intelligence Agency, a position he will now need to relinquish as it is a body subject to oversight by the House of Assembly. I know both political parties wish to diversify the economy and I hope the knowledge Willin brings to the House is helpful.
Finally, Willin has spent the past months consulting on a significant anti-corruption investigation in another jurisdiction. The insight he gained from that will, I hope, help inform his thinking when it comes to issues relating to procurement and capital projects.
Children and Education:
There are certain things that both Harold and Willin have in common. Both had to work very hard to get to where they got to. Neither started with great privilege in life. As a result both have a fierce understanding of the gift of education and the curse if it is denied; both I believe will fight passionately for children’s rights and be very supportive of a Government who are focussed on our children – both their education and their welfare.
I hope both Harold and Willin will also be role models demonstrating how legal (and I do stress the word ‘legal’) immigrants to these Islands – or people born of immigrants to these Islands – can enrich the Islands future and aspire to serve.
Just Two Among Fifteen
Beyond their skill and character, beyond their status as a citizen of these Islands, any who worry that there are now members in the House of Assembly who can explicitly bring into the House the views of the legal, lawful, immigrant community, be they first or second generation, need only reflect that these are just two members amongst 15, and the Government has such a strong majority that their ‘will’ simply cannot be frustrated so long as they act within the law.
I do hope both benches welcome Harold and Willin not only as colleagues but as fellow Turks and Caicos Islanders; I do hope debate in the House can be enriched by their presence; I do hope the skills they bring are valued, and; I do hope it helps further build a society where division is increasingly replaced by a process of managed integration, and increasing inclusion.
Helping generate what I think is an important conversation that needs to be had throughout the term of this Parliament, is the end of my public contribution on this matter. If I am criticised for starting a debate, and putting forward Turks and Caicos Islanders who can contribute to that debate, seems a rather modest contribution to make. The really hard work is of course for Turks and Caicos Islanders to take the conversation wherever they wish, and work out the long term future of how a population that was just 7,000 in 1980, and which is on track to grow to 70,000 by 2040, can increasingly be at ease on matters relating to identity and inclusion.
Only One Term:
Finally I have made it clear to both my appointees that my recommendation to any successor will be that they should not be reappointed after one term. That is because I believe the maximum number of people should be cycled through these roles bringing the maximum amount of opportunity and diversity to the Chamber. But also because, as Governor, I do not wish to impose on the public purse by having members of the House of Assembly that I appoint profit from the generous pension provision, following two terms of office, without having had to stand before the electorate.
Conclusion:
To conclude, I have been very consistent that this issue has to be decided and concluded by Turks and Caicos’ Islanders. But my responsibilities as the Governor of all these Islands brings with is a responsibility to every person who lives here, under the law. It is therefore incumbent on me – if I see a chronic problem – that is not being tackled – to highlight it. The stalling of the long awaited ‘Islander Commission’ last year – the one route to gain Islander status in TCI, so long delayed, worried me.
I restate I have no view as to who should get status in these Islands that decision is only to be made by Turks and Caicos Islanders – but I have an obligation, placed on me by the Constitution, that such a route must exist. With the election concluded I will look for it to restart its work imminently.
I wish all the appointed members well, including those from the political parties, and I hope the debate, that I believe my appointments will generate will help take forward an over-due national conversation that results in a more inclusive TCI where the status of being a TCI Islander, however that status was achieved, and however that process in the future is managed, is a badge of solid national unity and shared national pride.
So may God Bless the Turks and Caicos and may God bless the Turks and Caicos Islanders.
His Excellency Dr Mohamed Irfaan Ali has declared three days of national mourning following the tragic loss of lives in the M.V. Barima incident, as the nation continues to grieve alongside the families and communities affected.
The period of national mourning will be observed from Wednesday, July 22, through Friday, July 24, 2026, in honour of the victims of the tragedy. During this time, the National Flag will be flown at half-mast on all Government buildings and other appropriate locations across the country.
As part of the observances, Wednesday, July 22, has been designated a National Day of Prayer. A National Day of Prayer and Remembrance will be held at the Kingston Seawall in Georgetown, bringing together citizens in solidarity to honour the lives lost and offer support to grieving families.
The programme of remembrance will continue with a Night of Reflection and Prayer in Port Kaituma on Thursday, July 23, followed by another observance in Mabaruma on Friday, July 24.
The government is also encouraging religious organisations, civic groups and citizens throughout Guyana to organise candlelight vigils and moments of prayer during the three days as the nation collectively reflects on the tragedy and pays tribute to the victims. The declaration of national mourning underscores the government’s commitment to standing with the bereaved families and affected communities as Guyana mourns one of the country’s most heartbreaking maritime tragedies.
Cheaper shipping. Lower energy costs. Better access to healthcare. Stronger consumer protections.
Those are among the measures CARICOM Heads of Government believe could finally begin reducing the stubbornly high cost of living for millions of people across the Caribbean.
Meeting in Saint Lucia, regional leaders agreed that making life more affordable must become one of the Community’s highest priorities. Their emerging strategy includes reducing freight costs through a regional ferry service, accelerating renewable energy projects to lessen dependence on imported fuel, expanding regional healthcare partnerships, strengthening consumer protection, and encouraging governments to adopt successful cost-of-living measures already being implemented across the Caribbean.
“Our discussions over the past four days were guided by one central objective – ensuring that CARICOM delivers results that people can see and feel in their everyday lives,” CARICOM Chairman and Saint Lucia Prime Minister Philip J. Pierre said.
Few places may welcome that relief more than The Bahamas and the Turks and Caicos Islands.
Although inflation has moderated in both countries from the sharp increases experienced following the pandemic, the cost of living remains stubbornly high. Families continue to complain about grocery bills that stretch household budgets, rising housing costs, expensive electricity, healthcare expenses and fuel prices that remain among the highest in the region.
Governments have responded.
In The Bahamas, successive reductions in Value Added Tax on selected goods and other targeted tax measures have sought to ease pressure on consumers. In the Turks and Caicos Islands, the Government this weekend opens applications for its $500 Cost of Living Relief Programme, acknowledging that many households continue to struggle despite the country’s economic success.
Yet affordability remains elusive.
The contradiction is difficult to ignore.
The Turks and Caicos Islands continues to post one of the region’s strongest tourism-driven economies, with robust investment, record visitor spending and sustained construction activity. The Bahamas has also strengthened its economic position, earning improved sovereign credit ratings as tourism, government revenues and fiscal performance continue to recover.
Yet those encouraging economic indicators have not translated into noticeably lower household expenses.
The reason is largely structural.
Both The Bahamas and the Turks and Caicos Islands produce relatively little of what they consume. Food, fuel, medicines, vehicles, building materials and countless household essentials are imported. Both countries also record significant trade deficits, illustrating their dependence on overseas suppliers. Every increase in global shipping costs, fuel prices or supply chain disruptions is eventually reflected in supermarket prices, utility bills and the cost of everyday living.
That is why CARICOM’s agenda matters.
If regional leaders succeed in lowering freight costs through an inter-island ferry network, expanding renewable energy, improving regional cargo movement, strengthening consumer protections and making healthcare more accessible through cooperation, the benefits could extend far beyond government balance sheets.
For Bahamians and Turks and Caicos Islanders, success will not be measured by another tourism record or another credit rating upgrade. It will be measured at the supermarket checkout, on the monthly electricity bill, at the gas pump and in the simple ability to afford a better quality of life.
The Caribbean’s food systems challenge is fast evolving into a broader development challenge.
Despite decades of policy attention and investment, the region remains one of the most food import-dependent in the world, spending over US$6 billion annually. At the same time, countries continue to grapple with food insecurity, high rates of diet-related non-communicable diseases, climate vulnerability, and exposure to external shocks that can disrupt supply chains and drive up food prices almost overnight.
For Small Island Developing States (SIDS), food security has shifted from an agriculture focus alone, it’s about economic resilience, health, climate resilience and sustainable growth.
Recognizing this reality, Caribbean governments have elevated food systems transformation as a regional priority through the CARICOM 25 x 25 Plus Five Agenda, which seeks to reduce food import dependence while strengthening domestic production, regional trade, and resilience. Across Barbados and the Eastern Caribbean, governments have also developed National Food Systems Pathways that identify the investments, partnerships, and policy reforms needed to transform food systems and accelerate progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Yet one challenge has remained persistent: financing.
In the face of high levels of public debt and limited fiscal space, while public investment remains critical, Caribbean governments simply cannot shoulder the financing burden alone. Transforming food systems at scale requires mobilizing far greater private capital, alongside development finance and public resources.
This was the rationale behind the recent convened in Barbados.
The Forum brought together governments, investors, international financial institutions, private sector leaders, regional organizations, and the United Nations around a simple proposition: food systems should be viewed not only as a development priority, but also as an investable asset class.
A distinguishing feature of the innovative gathering was its focus on attracting private investment—particularly private equity, impact investment, and blended finance solutions capable of supporting businesses and infrastructure across food value chains. By helping enterprises access growth capital and connecting investors with scalable opportunities, the initiative sought to unlock financing that complements public investment rather than adding to already constrained public balance sheets.
A key outcome was the launch of a regional Deal Book comprising approximately US$320 million in investment opportunities across seven countries, spanning agriculture, fisheries, agro-processing, logistics, and strategic food systems infrastructure. The Deal Book created a practical bridge between capital seeking opportunities and opportunities seeking capital, while enabling direct engagement between governments, enterprises, and investors.
The results were encouraging.
Across four sector-focused deal rooms, participants explored investment-ready and near-investment-ready opportunities and discussed blended finance private equity, risk-sharing, and partnerships to advance projects toward implementation.
The Forum highlighted a shift in perspective: food systems are now seen as strategic drivers of economic diversification, resilience, competitiveness, and growth. Investments across production, processing, logistics, and distribution can strengthen regional supply chains, create new businesses, generate jobs, and reduce vulnerability to external shocks.
For the United Nations, this experience reinforced an important lesson.
Transforming food systems requires more than the technical expertise of individual agencies. It requires integrated solutions that connect agriculture, nutrition, health, climate resilience, trade, private sector development, and financing.
This is where the Resident Coordinator System plays a critical role.
Across Barbados and the Eastern Caribbean, the Resident Coordinator Office has united UN system capabilities around a common food systems agenda. Working with FAO, WFP, the UN Food Systems Coordination Hub, and other partners, the RCO has helped align policy support, technical expertise, partnerships, and financing with nationally identified priorities.
The Forum demonstrated this integrated approach by convening governments, investors, development finance institutions, private sector actors, and UN agencies around a common objective. It showcased the UN’s comparative advantage as a trusted broker capable of connecting development priorities with investment opportunities.
The Forum’s success will be measured not by dialogue generated, but by investments mobilized, businesses expanded, and progress made toward resilient, competitive Caribbean food systems across the Caribbean.
Its most important outcome may therefore be what comes next.
The work starts now.
Kenroy Roach is Head of the UN Resident Coordinator Office for Barbados and the Eastern Caribbean