Connect with us

TCI News

TCI: Hon. Vaden Williams – Contribution to Debate on Status of Children Bill

Published

on

#Grand Turk, January 29, 2019 – Turks and Caicos

Good morning Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, the Status of Children Bill 2018 is among one of several outstanding Family Law Bills that had required further stakeholders consultation.

Over the last several months the Ministry of Home Affairs, along with the Attorney General’s Chambers, the Social Development Department and other stakeholders including the judiciary conducted meetings to review this Bill.

We are here today to present the final product of their hard work, with respect to this particular bill, and Mr. Speaker I want to pause to thank them for their efforts on the collection of family law bills on a whole.

Mr. Speaker, some persons may be asking why are we introducing this bill and what is its purpose of this Status of children Bill

In a nutshell Mr. Speaker  we are introducing this bill because it is important for the Turks and Caicos Islands to ensure that all laws relating to children is up-to date and meets the standard of international best practices and conventions.

In addition to this Mr. Speaker, My Government is a Government that is working to protect all of the rights of all of our children.

Hence, the purpose of this bill Mr. Speaker, is to provide equal status to all of children in the Turks and Caicos Islands.

When we use the word status here Mr. Speaker, we are not speaking about immigration status of children. We are talking about how they are treated under the law regardless of whether they are born inside a marriage, or, whether they were born to two un-married parents.

As such, Mr. Speaker, the Bill proposes to repeal the `Legitimation Ordinance and the Illegitimacy Ordinance which overlap with what this bill is trying to achieve. It will also save certain sections as well as modify some parts of the provisions that are saved, to ensure that they match with the policy positions taken by our Government.

Mr. Speaker, I will highlight the issues this bill seeks to address, in five parts in accordance with the five parts of this bill.

PART 1 – Preliminary

Mr. Speaker, Part 1 of the bill simply

  • Sets out the meaning or definition of key terms
  • states who this bill applies to, and
  • protects any related right a child would have had before this bill.

 

 PART 2 – Status of Children

 Mr. Speaker, part 2 is seeking to do several things.

  • It is seeking to remove labels such as il-legitimate, legitimate, lawful or unlawful that have been pegged on to some children in our society for many generations. Our policy is that there will not be any distinction between children based on the marital status of their parent. Many children have been treated unkindly because of this, and Mr. Speaker I am happy that this caring Government is taking this important step to put the law on their side.

 

  • Another thing that this part provides for, Mr. Speaker, is a list of several types of relationships, which shall be used in law, to determine the natural father of a child unless there is some other proof to confirm that he is not a child’s father. I will not go through the full list now, Mr. Speaker, but I do look forward to the contributions from Members of this Honorable House during the debate, and more importantly, during the Committee of the Whole.

Before I move on to the next part Mr. Speaker,  it is important to highlight that this section also propose that we have provisions in our laws, for the very first time, presumptions of parentage based on artificial conception procedure.

Finally, it provides for certain conditions under which the Registrar shall file an instrument in the Registry of Births, when a father acknowledges paternity.

 

PART 3 – PARENTAGE

This part 3 Mr. Speaker, is making provisions for instances when a person can apply to the court to declare parentage.

It further provides for the court to require a parent test procedure it outlines matters that should be taken into account before a court order is made, and it lists the information that the results from the testing procedure should contain.

Last but not least, Mr. Speaker, it requires the Minister to approve a laboratory for carrying out parent testing procedure and enable the Minister to nominate a reporter for the approved laboratory or lab. This is important Mr. Speaker to ensure that standards are upheld and that personal information is kept strictly confidential.

 

PART 4 – DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY

Mr. Speaker, if there is one only area that cause strife within a family, is the manner in which property is given to other family members either through gifts or inheritance.

Clause 16 to 19 of this Part 4, Mr. Speaker, totally abolishes the distinction between children born within a marriage and outside a marriage and places them on equal footing for inheriting property, when a parent dies without a will.

We also know that there are cases where parents sometimes make paternity claim after the passing a presumed father. This bill now enables the administrator of a will to make reasonable inquiries regarding the existence of any other person who could claim an interest in the estate of the decease.

It also relieves the administrator of the responsibility to seek more information that he honestly and reasonably thinks is necessary and protects him from action being taken against him if had no knowledge or notice of a potential relationship between a person and the deceased.

It should be noted that Part 4 of this bill Mr. Speaker starts off by ensuring that the earlier provisions regarding wills and gifts that were completed or became effective before this bill, shall continue to be as is, and will not be affected by this bill.

 

PART 5 – MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Part 5 is the final part of this bill, Mr. Speaker, and it contains provisions relating to hearings, penalties for failure to adhere to parentage testing or seeking to tamper with tests, existing rights, regulations and repeal.

Mr. Speaker, in keeping with the rights of the child, this Government, my Government, is committed to protecting the rights of every child from all forms of physical or mental violence, injury or abuse, neglect or negligent treatment and maltreatment or exploitation.

Mr. Speaker, I look forward to the support of all members of this Honorable House on the Status of Children Bill that is being proposed here today and I now invite them, through you Mr. Speaker, to make their contributions to this very important pieces of legislation

 

Thank you Mr. Speaker

 

Continue Reading

News

Better Products, Safer Services Targeted Under National Quality Plan

Published

on

Government Advances Policy Aimed at Consumer Protection and Higher Business Standards

 

By Deandrea Hamilton

PROVIDENCIALES, Turks and Caicos Islands — Efforts to improve product quality, strengthen consumer protections and raise business standards across the Turks and Caicos Islands are moving into a new phase as government advances implementation of its National Quality Policy.

The Department of Trade, Industry and Fair Competition announced that a team of consultants spent a week in the Turks and Caicos Islands meeting with key public and private sector stakeholders as part of the policy’s implementation process.

Approved by Cabinet in October 2024, the National Quality Policy is designed to establish a national quality infrastructure that supports trade, protects consumers and improves the competitiveness of local businesses.

For consumers, the long-term goal is straightforward: greater confidence that products and services meet accepted standards for quality, safety and reliability.

For businesses, the initiative aims to encourage stronger quality management systems that can improve efficiency, build customer trust and create opportunities for expansion into regional and international markets.

During the May 25 to 29 mission, consultants met with representatives from the National Quality Council, Pelican Energy TCI, the Turks and Caicos Islands Airports Authority, the TCI Government Laboratory, the Turks and Caicos Hotel and Tourism Association and Turks Head Brewery.

According to the Department, the consultations were intended to assess existing quality-related systems, identify gaps and gather recommendations that will help shape the Territory’s national quality infrastructure.

“The policy serves as a strategic framework for establishing a national quality infrastructure in the Turks and Caicos Islands, aimed at improving quality standards, supporting trade, protecting consumers, and enhancing economic competitiveness,” the Department said in a statement.

Officials explained that stakeholder feedback will help determine what systems, standards and programmes are needed to strengthen quality assurance across various sectors of the economy.

The Department said the information gathered will guide the next stage of implementation and help ensure the policy delivers meaningful benefits throughout the Islands.

Among the initiatives expected to emerge from the process are a Quality Certification Programme and a series of educational workshops designed to help businesses understand and adopt quality standards.

A second round of stakeholder consultations is scheduled for June, allowing government and industry representatives to continue discussions and further assess priority areas identified during the initial mission.

Officials say the ultimate objective is to build a culture of quality that benefits consumers, businesses and the wider economy by encouraging higher standards, greater accountability and improved competitiveness.

Angle by Deandrea Hamilton. Built with ChatGPT (AI). Magnetic Media — CAPTURING LIFE.

 

Continue Reading

News

240 Migrants Interdicted in TCI Waters; Regiment says Mission Averted Potential Maritime Tragedy

Published

on

By Deandrea Hamilton

PROVIDENCIALES, Turks and Caicos Islands — Startling video released by U.S. Customs and Border Protection showing hundreds of suspected Haitian migrants crammed aboard an overloaded vessel has renewed concerns about the worsening migration crisis in the region and the increasing pressure being placed on the Turks and Caicos Islands.

The vessel, carrying 240 irregular migrants, was intercepted in Turks and Caicos waters on the night of May 31, in a joint operation involving the Turks and Caicos Islands Regiment, the Royal Turks and Caicos Islands Police Force, the TCI Border Force, the United States Coast Guard and U.S. Customs and Border Protection Air and Marine Operations.

Earlier reports from U.S. authorities revealed that the vessel was discovered in a dangerously overcrowded condition and was ultimately secured and escorted to shore by local marine officers.

Now, a newly released statement from the Turks and Caicos Islands Regiment sheds additional light on the operation and the risks involved.

According to the Regiment, Patrol Vessel James Fulford interdicted the vessel at approximately 9:33 p.m. within territorial waters before authorities determined the situation was far more serious than a routine migrant interception.

“Upon evaluating the migrant vessel, the Royal Turks and Caicos Islands Police Force immediately upgraded the operation to a critical incident, prioritizing Safety of Life at Sea protocols to avert a maritime disaster,” the statement explained.

The migrants were identified as 191 adult males, 44 adult females, one male minor and four female minors.

All 240 individuals were safely transferred to authorities for processing, health assessments and security screening.

Lieutenant Colonel Ennis Grant, Commanding Officer of the TCI Regiment, praised the coordinated response among local and international agencies.

“This mission underscores the efficacy of our multi-agency partnerships. The rapid transition of this operation from a standard interdiction task to a high-priority Safety of Life at Sea intervention demonstrates the professionalism and readiness of our joint forces. By working in seamless tandem with our U.S. partners, we successfully prevented a potential maritime tragedy.”

The incident highlights the continuing humanitarian and security challenges facing the Turks and Caicos Islands as instability, gang violence and economic hardship continue to drive migration from Haiti.

While much larger nations often dominate regional migration discussions, the latest interdiction demonstrates the outsized role the Turks and Caicos Islands continues to play on the front line of Caribbean migration enforcement.

The Regiment said it remains committed to securing the country’s maritime borders through persistent surveillance and strong inter-agency cooperation.

The interception is among the largest migrant landings recorded in the Turks and Caicos Islands this year and serves as another reminder of the dangerous journeys many Haitians continue to undertake in search of safety and opportunity.

Angle by Deandrea Hamilton. Built with ChatGPT (AI). Magnetic Media — CAPTURING LIFE.

Continue Reading

News

How Misick Fell Short of The UN’s Worst Corruption Standard

Published

on

Judge Cites Kofi Annan, But Finds No Evidence Defendants Caused the Wider Harm Described by the Former UN Chief

 

By Deandrea Hamilton

Turks and Caicos, June 9, 2026 – One week after former Premier Michael Misick, former Cabinet minister McAllister Hanchell and attorney Thomas “Chal” Misick began serving prison sentences in the Turks and Caicos Islands’ landmark corruption case, attention is turning to a significant distinction made by Justice Rajendra Narine during sentencing.

In imposing prison terms on May 29, the judge agreed that corruption is a serious offence capable of causing profound societal harm. Yet he also found that there was no evidence the three convicted men caused the sweeping consequences described in one of the world’s most famous condemnations of corruption.

The quotation came from former United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan, who famously wrote:

“Corruption is an insidious plague that has a wide range of corrosive effects on societies. It undermines democracy and the rule of law, leads to violations of human rights, distorts markets, erodes the quality of life and allows organized crime, terrorism and other threats to human security to flourish.”

Annan further observed:

“This evil phenomenon is found in all countries — big and small, rich and poor — but it is in the developing world that its effects are most destructive.”

Justice Narine acknowledged the quotation but drew an important distinction between the broad consequences of corruption described by Annan and the evidence presented during the trial.

“The court agrees that there is no evidence in this case that the offending parties actually caused or contributed to any of the harmful consequences described in the quotation,” Narine said.

The finding did not spare the defendants from prison.

The judge made clear that the offences remained serious enough to warrant immediate custodial sentences.

“This case was about an abuse of public trust for the sake of personal gain,” Narine stated.

“The conduct of the defendants caused a constitutional crisis and reputational harm to the territory.”

He added that the public interest demanded punishment and deterrence.

“The public interest requires that the sentence must reflect society’s abhorrence of the criminal conduct and the sentence should be such that like-minded potential offenders would be deterred from similar conduct.”

Narine also rejected suggestions that the absence of direct victims diminished the seriousness of the offences, noting that corruption often harms institutions and public confidence rather than identifiable individuals.

At the same time, the court accepted several mitigating factors advanced by the defence.

“The court is aware of the age, middle age of the offenders, that the immediate custodial sentences would have a traumatic effect on the families, understanding the emotional distress involved,” Narine said.

He also agreed that rehabilitation was not a major concern.

“The court agrees with the defence counsel that there is a low risk of reoffending and that the objective of rehabilitation is not a significant factor in this case.”

Those considerations, combined with the extraordinary delay in bringing the matter to conclusion and the defendants’ previous good character, contributed to substantial reductions from the starting points the judge initially considered.

Michael Misick ultimately received an effective sentence of four years and 26 days on three bribery convictions. Hanchell was sentenced to three years on two bribery counts, while Chal Misick received four years on four money laundering convictions.

The legal saga, however, is far from over.

All three men remain in custody while awaiting a June 17 hearing on applications for bail pending appeal. In addition, confiscation proceedings — which could determine what assets or funds may be recoverable by the Crown — are still to come.

For now, the court’s message appears clear: while the conduct warranted prison and public condemnation, Justice Narine was not prepared to conclude that the defendants’ actions produced the full range of societal devastation described in Annan’s warning about corruption.

Angle by Deandrea Hamilton. Built with ChatGPT (AI). Magnetic Media — CAPTURING LIFE.

Continue Reading

FIND US ON FACEBOOK

TRENDING