Turks and Caicos, May 29, 2026 – Nearly two months after 46 officers were promoted within the Royal Turks and Caicos Islands Police Force, the opposition People’s Democratic Movement says it is standing with officers and members of the public who continue to question the fairness and transparency of the process.
In a statement issued on May 19, the PDM called for an independent review of the promotions, arguing that allegations circulating publicly are serious enough to warrant closer scrutiny and greater transparency.
The promotions, announced by Commissioner of Police Fitz Bailey on April 2, represented the largest advancement exercise undertaken by the Force in recent years. Six officers were elevated to Assistant Superintendent, 15 to Inspector and 25 to Sergeant following what the Force described as a rigorous process involving examinations, interviews and leadership assessments.
According to the Police Force, examinations were assessed by the University of the West Indies campuses in Barbados and Jamaica. Candidates also participated in interviews before a stakeholder panel, with final recommendations reviewed by the Force Executive and ultimately approved by Governor Dileeni Daniel-Selvaratnam.
However, the PDM says questions continue to persist.
Among the concerns referenced by the party are allegations that promotion examination materials may have been leaked, claims of unfair treatment and reports that some officers believe promotion decisions did not reflect performance or outcomes achieved during the assessment process.
The party stressed that its position is not an attack on Commissioner Bailey, the Police Force or any officer who received a promotion.
Instead, the PDM argues that because police officers are restricted in their ability to publicly discuss grievances, there is a greater responsibility on authorities to ensure concerns about fairness and transparency are independently examined.
The opposition further argues that promotions within a police service are not merely internal employment matters but decisions that affect morale, leadership, discipline and public confidence in the Force.
Commissioner Bailey has publicly defended the promotions, stating that the process was transparent, fair and based on performance, merit and good conduct. The Force has also emphasized that promotion decisions were not based solely on examination scores.
The PDM contends that an independent review would either validate the process or identify areas requiring improvement, ultimately strengthening confidence in the institution.
Despite the call for a review, there has been no public indication that an independent examination will be commissioned. Nor has the Force publicly detailed how examinations, interviews, service records and leadership assessments were weighted in arriving at final promotion decisions.
For now, the promotions stand approved by the Governor, but the debate surrounding how they were reached appears far from settled.
Angle by Deandrea Hamilton. Built with ChatGPT (AI). Magnetic Media — CAPTURING LIFE.