Connect with us

TCI Court

New President for Court of Appeal, Justice Alice Yorke-Soo Hon



The public is advised of the appointment of the new President of the Court of Appeal which takes effect from April 27 2024.

Madame Justice Yorke-Soo Hon, Justice of Appeal of the Court of Appeal of Trinidad and Tobago, was admitted to the Bar in 1982 and was appointed to the Court of Appeal in October 2008.

Prior to her appointment to the High Court Bench in 1997, Justice Yorke-Soo Hon had over 15 years practice at the Bar, more notably in Criminal Law. She obtained her LL.B from the University of the West Indies in 1980 and her L.E.C at the Hugh Wooding Law School where she serves today as an Associate Tutor in Criminal Practice and Procedure. From 2013 – 2016 she also tutored in Ethics, Rights & Obligations of the Legal Profession.

Madame Justice Yorke-Soo Hon is a member of the Board of the Judicial Education Institute of Trinidad and Tobago and a fellow of the Commonwealth Judicial Education Institute. She also holds a diploma in ‘Training Judicial Trainers’ from the University College of London. Madame Justice Yorke-Soo Hon has chaired a number of Committees, including the Bench Book Committee responsible for the publication of the Criminal Bench Book in Trinidad and Tobago in 2015, the Sentencing Update Handbook (2016) and the implementation of the Criminal Procedure Rules (2017). She was also a member of the Criminal Justice Reform Committee (JURIST Project), and the Chairperson of the Magistrates’ Benchbook Committee, which was tasked with the publication of the Handbook for Magistrates in the English-speaking Caribbean (2021). Presently the Honourable Madame Justice Yorke-Soo Hon serves as a member of the Sentencing Guidelines Advisory Committee for the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court and co-chairs the Monitoring, Evaluating and Facilitating Committee of the Needham’s Point Declaration on Criminal Justice Reform in the Caribbean.

She has done extensive training in Criminal Practice and Procedure with both Attorneys and Judicial Officers in Trinidad and Tobago and in the region.

TCI Court

Sexual Assault matter gets RETRIAL order at Court of Appeal



Wilkie Arthur

Freelance Court Correspondent

It was before a three justices of the High Court of Appeal panel: The Hon. Mr Justice Adderley, JA, President (Ag.) (Presiding); The Hon. Madam Justice Cornelius Thorne, JA and the Hon. Mr. Justice Hylton, JA.

Appearances were: Mr Oliver Smith K.C for the appellant, LOPEZ KENO WILLIAMS and  Ms Nayasha Hatmin for the respondent or the Office of the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP).

The appeal was heard on January 15th, 2024 and a decision handed down on February 29th, 2024.

The issues raised in the appeal by King’s Counsel Smith and challenged by the Crown’s Senior Counsel, Mrs Hatmin were that of Sexual Assault by Penetration.  It was an appeal against Conviction and Sentence; Constitutional Rights of the appellant; the  Right of Review of Conviction or Sentence; the right to a fair hearing; incomplete trial transcript; the effect of an incomplete transcript and the final issue was whether an

incomplete transcript constitutes a deprivation of the Appellant’s Constitutional Rights.

Local and international previous high court cases were left for the Court’s consideration such as:

– Evon Jack v R [2021] JMCA Crim 31;

– Treverson Saunders v Regina; 

– Lincoln Smith v Regina (CR-AP 7 of 2015; CR-AP 28 of 2015) [2017] TCACA 4 (1 December 2017).

The court outlines that they are aware that sexual abuse of children plagues our societies. Cases involving sexual abuse are particularly sensitive because of the recognised vulnerability of the complainants and the potential loss of freedom and reputation of the accused.

The prosecution and adjudication of such matters are rife with legal difficulties which the courts must carefully negotiate. The most careful handling of the case must be taken by the State at every stage to protect the rights of both complainant and accused.

The facts of the case as were laid out.

On January 17th, 2023 Keno Williams, the appellant, was convicted of one count of Sexual Assault by penetration. He was sentenced to a four-year term of imprisonment.

He appealed his conviction and sentence.

The case for the Crown was that the appellant was well known to the

complainant, who was 14 years old at the time the (alleged) offence took place. A series of WhatsApp messages were exchanged between them, in which the

appellant importuned her with request for sexual activity in return for money, the alleged victim had requested.

The Complainant saved some of the messages on her phone and

took screenshots of others. The Crown’s case continued that she later sent these screenshots to another close friend. On the date of the offence while the complainant was babysitting the child of the appellant’s girlfriend, the appellant pushed her up against a wall and sexually assaulted her. Apart from her friend to whom she sent the WhatsApp messages and confided the incident, she told no one until she had an argument with her mother, to whom she then revealed the assault.

The appellant’s defence was a total denial, asserting that the WhatsApp messages were a fabrication made to a proxy account set up by the complainant, and that the sexual assault never happened. 

As in most sexual offence cases, the primary witness was the complainant, the 14-year old girl.

The hon court of appeal JUSTICES then mentioned the appellant’s grounds of appeal filed. The original grounds of appeal were filed on March 22nd 2023 and amended by new Counsel on 27th December 2023. The amended grounds of appeal are:

Ground 1-

Incomplete and inadequate trial transcript; there were missing sections of the evidence of witnesses as to material facts, as well as the absence of sections of the trial judges (sic) summation to the jury.  Such lacuna or gaps in information constitutes a breach of the right of the appellant to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence (appeal) as guaranteed under section 6(1) (c) of the Turks and Caicos Islands Constitution Order 2011.

Further the incompleteness and inadequacy of the trial transcript, as an example, the absence of the evidence in chief of the virtual complainant, further constitutes a breach of the right of the appellant to have a copy of the record of the proceedings made by

or on behalf of the court, as guaranteed under the said section 6(3) of the Turks and Caicos Islands Constitution order 2011.

The cumulative effect of the several cited instances of missing transcripts and the multiplier inadequacy, results in the denial of the constitutional rights set out above and as such the appellant has been, is being an is likely to be denied due process contrary to the Constitution.

Ground 2-

Admissibility of Computer-Generated Evidence

The learned trial judge erred in allowing the photographs of screenshots evidence. 

Resolution involves determining whether the screenshot evidence was authenticated so as to meet the test of admissibility. 

Resolution also requires addressing the issue of the integrity of the electronic system on which the evidence was stored. The erroneous admission of the photographs had prejudice (sic) the appellants case rendering the trial unfair.

Ground 3-

The Learned Trial Judge failed to Direct Jury as to Crown’s Exhibit 19

The Learned trial judge (sic) failed to direct the jury as to how to approach the WhatsApp messages and or failed to offer any meaningful assistance to the jury on how to deal with the screenshots of WhatsApp messages.

Having admitted such evidence and allowing the case to go to the

jury, the learned trial judges (sic) summation was vague and inadequate. 

It did not assist the jury sufficiently with how to treat the factual and legal issues concerning the photographs contained in the Crown’s Exhibit 1.

Ground 4-

Inadequate summation

The learned Trial Judge’s summing up was inadequate as the Trial Judge failed effectively Marshall (sic) the evidence to the jury during her charge.

The learned Honourable court of appeal JUSTICES said that, “significant lacuna” in the evidence of the witnesses and in the judge’s summation. In this case before us there is a substantial transcript of the evidence of the witnesses and at least two-thirds of the Judge’s summation has been recorded, but the unavailability of missing portions, particularly the examination-in-chief of the Complainant and the general directions makes the issue no less grave. 

As the Judge herself the Honourable Ms. Tanya Lobban-Jackson noted in her review of the evidence of the complainant, the case boils down to the word of the complainant.

The appellant, his attorney and the Court are entitled to have more than the Judge’s interpretation of the evidence before them to determine this Appeal.

The Prosecution has argued that the lack of a trial transcript is not always fatal to a case. In Evon Jack v R [2021] JMCA Crim 31 the Court of Appeal of Jamaica, noted that it was more likely to be fatal if it was combined with other factors, such as delay, I find that in the context of this case, the importance of the evidence of the Complainant and the other missing portions is sufficiently serious to establish that there is Constitutional deprivation of his, the Appellant’s rights.

The Court spoke on another local sexual case in which this happened before here in the TCI and said it is useful to repeat the injunction of Court in Saunders at paragraph [17} that “in future it is the responsibility of the Registrar and staff of the Registry to secure the record of proceeding from which the Record of Appeal is to be prepared’.

The court said, ‘clearly, that future is now.’

While technological failures cannot be predicted or always avoided, the circumstances in which a woefully inadequate transcript is presented to this Court with no explanation should henceforth be rare.

There has been no significant delay in this matter to the level of the eight-year delay in Evon. The Appellant was convicted on the 17″ January 2023 and sentenced on the 17″ March that year. There are few witnesses, and the evidence of the Complainant is the mainstay of the Prosecution’s case. It is therefore a suitable candidate for a retrial.

The Order of the Court is to allow the appeal, quash the conviction and sentence and order a retrial.

The court final words in this appeal decision were that, in the circumstances, it is prudent to not deal with the other grounds of appeal so as not in any way to tie the hands of the judge rehearing the matter.

KENO WILLIAMS has since been released on bail pending the decision of the office of the DPP if they will retry the case or just dismiss the matter against the accused.

Continue Reading

TCI Court

Four Plead guilty to Illegal Entry including one Bahamian and alleged Haitian Gangster



Wilkie Arthur

Freelance Court Correspondent

Four individuals were on Monday March 25, 2024 charged with unlawful/illegal entry; they were part of a group of 31 people who were intercepted at sea around Muddy Point, North Caicos were on Friday March 8.

They all admitted to the offense that read that they unlawfully entered the Turks and Caicos Islands without leave of Immigration authorities on the date in question.

On Monday, March 25th 2024 Immigration and Police officers brought the four before acting Resident Magistrate Ms Patricia Arana, who was sitting from the Grand Turk court house via video link to the Providenciales Magistrate’s Court as she arraigned.

Bahamian DEON ROLLE, 56; Haitian alleged gang member LAUMOMD LAYLER 28, and two other Haitian citizens, namely FRANCOIS MICHEL 41, and JEAN MARIO LECONTE 62 were arraigned.

Chris Eyre, Acting Commissioner of Police did report the arrest made involving Haitian gang member(s), but it appears to date, no Haitian alleged gang member was charged in accordance with TCI gang laws.  All charges were linked to the offense of illegal entry only. 

The men were all remanded to His Majesty’s Prison pending sentencing in the Grand Turk Magistrate’s court which was scheduled for Tuesday April 2, 2024.

Continue Reading

TCI Court

Career Tourist Burglar escapes 14 Years; High on drugs, will enter Re-hab and gave back stolen stuff



Wilkie Arthur
Freelance Court Correspondent

Police initially charged JULIANO FULFORD with aggravated burglary of a tourist home in Long Bay, Providenciales.

Through his defense counsel Mrs Leanna Brooks-Campbell, he entered a plea of guilty to the offence of burglary and not that of aggravated burglary. He was later sentenced to THREE years and four months on March 26th, 2024.

Defense counsel made an application to the Crown to get the charge reduced from Aggravated Burglary to Burglary. In the law books of the Turks and Caicos Islands books and most other countries, aggravated burglary or home invasion carries up to life in prison with simple burglary carrying up to 14 years if there is a guilty plea or a conviction of guilt in the Supreme Court.

The sentencing court learned that FULFORD assisted with the recovery of all of the items, with the exception of a set of headphones. The headphones may have gotten lost when he left the residence; there was no evidence to suggest that he did not want to return the only missing item out of many other items stolen.

Counsel for the accused put forth a case in plea and mitigation that following dismissal from his job given that things were slow he resorted to drug use and that during the commission of the offence he was under the influence of drugs which was committed on impulse and not a planned attacked.

The lawyer, Brooks-Campbell told the court that they accept that the offence was serious as it was committed during the early hours of the morning on a villa which housed tourists.

However, no violence was used; no one was harmed; he cooperated with the police, and has shown remorse for his actions.

The defense asked for a Conditional sentence order which would encompass a part of the sentence being served in custody (time spent) as he was remanded for several months and a portion in rehabilitated outside of prison, under the supervision of the Drug and Substance abuse authority, where he would be subject to regular drug testing.

The prosecution argued that the prison has a drug programme that he can undergo.

The prosecution asked for seven years upward adjustment, the defense asked for a one year downward adjustment and argued that Fulford has to be rehabilitated to assist with his integration back into society.

The Court ruled that the offence was aggravated by the fact that it was serious, there was an invasion of a valuable resource – tourism – the bread and basket of the TCI.

Additionally, the offence was committed in the early hours of the morning while persons were at home; attacks on tourist are prevalent in the TCI and there must be a deterrence.

The judge balanced this with the mitigating factors and he was sentenced to three years and four months. His sentence was reduced by one third due his guilty plea and the Judge recommended that he take advantage of the programmes in prison aimed at rehabilitation.

FULFORD has other previous convictions for burglary and had been recently released from prison when this latest incident transpired, on Friday August 11th 2023.

These facts were considered in the sentencing; the three years and four months given the serious nature and implications of the crime, was deemed “unduly lenient” according to some remarking on the outcome of the case.

Continue Reading