Connect with us

News

Man Spared a Life Sentence in Serious Wounding Case

Published

on

Wilkie Arthur

Freelance Court Reporter

 

#TurksandCaicos, December 15, 2023 – He was busted in the head and sliced from back to front of his neck; the images of the injuries are blood curdling.

It was supposed to be a short and straightforward wounding with intent trial, instead it ended up running a near three weeks due to complications and objections in the matter.

The accused is Mr. TERINE HARVEY AKA TC and the Office of the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP) brought him before the court on allegations that he on Thursday June 16th, 2022 in Pine or Sam Wilson Yard did maliciously and unlawfully wound Valman “Val” Forbes.

The trial started on Monday October 30th and ended on Friday November 17th 2023.

Representing the defendant, TC, was Senior Human Rights Defense Attorney, Sheena Mair.  For the Office of the DPP was Senior Public Prosecutor, Nayasha Hatmin.

On October 30th there were issues in the jury process due to insufficient numbers to commence impaneling, and her Ladyship Ms. Tanya Lobban Jackson adjourned to the following day for more potential jurors to attend court.

The jury numbers slowly became sufficient throughout the day on October 31, but the case still could not proceed because the prosecutor with conduct of the matter Mrs. Hatmin was ill and Principal Public Prosecutor Clement Joseph was holding for her.

Mr. Joseph, Ms. Mair and Justice Lobban Jackson discussed and agreed to move forward with the jury selection and five women and two men were picked with the trial set to start the following day, November 1.

When the virtual complainant, Valman “Val” Forbes took the stand, he began his testimony by swearing on the Bible to tell the truth and nothing, but the truth.

Forbes said on the night of June 16th, 2022, TC cut him with something sharp that he didn’t see.  He said he only saw TC’s hand moved swiftly when he tried to turn around and held his neck after feeling the swipe.  Val told the jury he heard a bottle bust, and shortly after, he was cut by TC.  He didn’t see him bust the bottle.

Val gave testimony of how he had to do two or three different statements because his first statement got lost by police officers.  His supporting witness refused to cooperate with the police to give another statement, having learned that the first statement given went missing.

Val Forbes told the court that he and TC had a problem before, and the day of the incident was a continuation.  He said they were in Sam’s/Pine’s Yard in Kew Town, playing Dominos, gambling and drinking.  He admitted, and yes, “smoking weed too.”

He said he and TC argued on more than one occasion and what he think really got him when he told him, “Boy girls/women looking for money these days,” suggesting that TC has none.

Forbes said TC kicked him on his leg and he (Forbes) punched him; they got into a fight.

“I had to show him, he ain’t ready for me.”

Throughout Forbes’ testimony, in an upset and uncomfortable manner, he kept belittling and stating derogatory comments and statements about his alleged attacker as he sat in the defendant’s dock.

The complainant said “he thinks because I have one arm, he could have handled me, but he had to go get something and cut me.”

There were even seemingly irrelevant statements made including about a relationship, Forbes claims to have had with a police woman and how he “can’t stand her anymore.”

Val Forbes spent three days testifying in the witness stand and the cross examination could easily summed up as an unpleasant experience.

Having realized the VC, Val Forbes was not cooperating or unwilling to cooperate with her under cross-examination; Sheena Mair asked him if he smokes cocaine?  He replied, “Yes, we do that sometimes.”

She asked him if he’s high on ‘coke’ now while testifying, however Forbes denied being high at the time.  Still he showed signs of being agitated and irritable in the lengthy intense cross-examination by the defense.

What also appeared rather shocking and surprising was that the doctor testified and made no mention of the head injury.  Dr. Gregory Lawdell only spoke of the size, the depth, the seriousness, and in his professional opinion what he believes caused such a wound to Val’s neck.

Attorney Mair asked the doctor about Val’s behavior and mannerism toward the hospital staff that night when he came in for treatment and the doctor said he was very, very upset and angry but he doesn’t think it was towards the staff but because of what happened to him.

Forbes’ sister, Hynetta Karen Forbes testified regarding photos she took of her brother’s two injuries (head and neck) that night of the incident, as the Police nor the doctor took any photos and had none to give Mrs. Hatmin the prosecutor.

After the Crown closed their case, Sheena Mair made an application of “no case” submission to the judge Tanya Lobban-Jackson, but it was rejected.

The defense then called its only witness Jason Moore who said he refused to give the police another statement because he told them he “lied.”

Moore said he needed the money, and Val Forbes had “paid” him to lie.  He told the judge and jury he went back and told the authorities what he did.

Her Ladyship Ms. Tanya Lobban Jackson, at the close of the defense and prosecution speech or closing remarks, summed up the case to the jury by outlining the evidence and the law clearly to them.

They jury was then released for deliberation and came back with a verdict of not guilty against TERINE HARVEY.

Magnetic Media was present for days throughout this trial and captured the Val Forbes on video while the jury was out deliberating.

He appeared so happy and confident in hope of a guilty verdict.

We also captured the defendant outside the court while he awaited his verdict and after the verdict of “not guilty” was delivered.

Clearly pleased with the outcome, Harvey said about his attorney, “She’s the bomb, she’s the bomb.”

Bahamas News

Mother’s Pride Headlines Bahamian Takeover at Sixers-Heat Clash in Miami

Published

on

The Bahamas, March 30, 2026 – The voice of a proud mother captured the spirit of a nation Monday night, as Bendra Rolle shared heartfelt reflections on the overwhelming Bahamian support for her son, VJ Edgecombe, during the Philadelphia 76ers matchup against the Miami Heat in Miami.

“The patriotic support and scenery at my son, VJ Edgecombe’s NBA game… was overwhelming,” Rolle said in a statement issued following the game. “The arena in Miami was lit. Bimini and the Bahamas showed up and showed out.”

Her words come amid what has already been widely described as a remarkable showing of national pride, with Bahamians traveling in large numbers to South Florida to witness the young guard’s continued rise. For Rolle, however, the moment extended far beyond basketball.

“Beyond VJ’s basketball talents, I’m so moved by his magnetic personality and personal journey to inspire and excite an entire nation—our beloved Bahamas,” she said. “I thank God for VJ’s humility and for his hunger for greatness. He never forgets how far God has brought us.”

While the Sixers did not secure the win on the night, Edgecombe delivered a solid individual performance, finishing with 13 points and five assists. He made an early impact on the game, showing confidence and poise before foul trouble disrupted his rhythm, but still managed to leave his mark in meaningful minutes.

The game itself evolved into a cultural showcase, with Bahamian flags waving throughout the arena and chants ringing out in support of Edgecombe. Much of that presence was bolstered by a coordinated travel push from Bahamasair, which helped facilitate fan travel and added to the electric atmosphere in Miami.

Rolle said the emotional weight of the moment was deeply felt by her family, as they witnessed firsthand the unity and pride of the Bahamian people.

“Thanks and love for the tears and overwhelming joy on Monday, Bahamas,” she expressed. “The Bahamian flags were love, loud, and proud. On my own behalf, VJ, and the entire family, I am ever grateful for the indescribable experience.”

Her closing words underscored what many have described as the true victory of the night—not the final score, but the powerful display of national pride and support surrounding one of The Bahamas’ rising stars.

Continue Reading

News

50 Years of Ministerial Government: Cabinet Moves to Mark Milestone Rooted in 1976 Constitution

Published

on

Turks and Caicos, March 30, 2026 – The Turks and Caicos Islands is preparing to mark a major political milestone, with Cabinet approving the establishment of a National Commemorative Committee to celebrate 50 years of ministerial government, a system first introduced under the 1976 Constitution.

The decision, confirmed in the February 10 Post Cabinet statement, signals a year of reflection on a governance model that fundamentally reshaped how the country is run — shifting from direct colonial administration toward locally led political leadership.

That shift was formalized in the Turks and Caicos Islands Constitution Order 1976, which laid the legal foundation for ministerial government and introduced a structured Executive and Legislative system.

At its core, the 1976 Constitution established an Executive Council, bringing together:

  • a Governor,
  • a Chief Minister elected by members of the Legislative Council,
  • and Ministers appointed to assist in governing the Islands.

A Very Different Government Back Then

If today’s Cabinet feels crowded, the 1976 version would have seemed almost unbelievable. There were just three Ministers serving alongside the Chief Minister — a tight, compact leadership team responsible for the affairs of an entire country. No sprawling list of ministries, no long roster of portfolios — just a handful of individuals carrying the weight of governance.

Becoming a Minister wasn’t a direct vote of the people either. You first had to win a seat in the Legislative Council, and from there, the Chief Minister would recommend who should serve. The Governor then made the appointments. In other words, political trust and alignment mattered just as much as public support — and ultimate authority still rested above the local leadership.

And as for job security? There wasn’t much of it. Ministers served without fixed terms and could be removed if they lost their seat, resigned, or if the Governor revoked their appointment. Even the Chief Minister could be ousted through a vote of no confidence. Add to that the basic requirements — being at least 21, a British subject, and meeting residency rules — and it’s clear that ministerial government in 1976 was not only smaller, but far more tightly controlled.

This marked the first time elected representatives were formally given defined roles in the administration of national affairs.

Under the Constitution, the Governor retained overarching authority, but was required in many instances to act on the advice of the Executive Council, particularly in shaping policy and overseeing government operations.

The Chief Minister, meanwhile, was positioned as the central political leader, responsible for directing government business and advising on the appointment of Ministers.

Importantly, the Constitution also allowed for the assignment of responsibilities to Ministers, giving them oversight of specific areas of government — a structure that remains at the heart of today’s Cabinet system.

Section 13 of the Order made clear that Ministers could be assigned responsibility for the administration of departments or government business, embedding accountability and functional governance into the system.

The Legislative Council, established alongside the Executive, provided the law-making body, with elected and appointed members participating in debates, passing legislation, and representing the interests of the Islands.

Together, these provisions created the framework for what is now recognized as ministerial government — a hybrid system balancing local political leadership with constitutional oversight by the Governor.

The explanatory note of the 1976 Order describes it as introducing “new provisions for the Government of the Turks and Caicos Islands,” including the creation of a Legislative Council with elected members and Ministers appointed on the advice of the Chief Minister.

Fifty years on, that structure has evolved through subsequent constitutional changes, but its foundation remains rooted in the 1976 framework.

Cabinet’s decision to establish a commemorative committee suggests that the anniversary will not only celebrate political progress, but also invite reflection on how effectively the system has delivered on its promise of representation, accountability, and governance.

As the Islands approach this Golden Jubilee, attention is likely to turn not only to the achievements of ministerial government, but also to the ongoing question of how the system continues to serve a modern and rapidly developing Turks and Caicos Islands.

Developed by Deandrea Hamilton • with ChatGPT (AI) • edited by Magnetic Media.

Continue Reading

News

Government Moves to Amend Destination Management Fee Law

Published

on

Turks and Caicos, March 30, 2026 – The Turks and Caicos Islands Government has signaled changes to its tourism funding framework, with Cabinet approving draft amendments to the Destination Management Fee Act 2023.

The decision was confirmed in the Post Cabinet statement following the February 5 meeting, chaired by Governor Dileeni Daniel-Selvaratnam, where members agreed to move forward with revisions to the law governing the collection and administration of the fee.

The Destination Management Fee, introduced in 2023, is applied to travelers entering the country and is embedded within the cost of travel. The charge was designed to support tourism-related development, including marketing, infrastructure, and sustainability initiatives.

At the time of its introduction, the fee was linked to the establishment of a Destination Management and Marketing Organisation (DMMO), which was expected to coordinate tourism strategy and enhance the visitor experience.

However, recent developments have shifted that landscape.

The DMMO has since been discontinued, raising new questions about how funds generated through the fee are being managed and what structure will now guide tourism development efforts.

The Cabinet note does not outline what specific changes are being proposed under the amended legislation.

It also does not indicate whether adjustments will be made to:

  • who pays the fee,
  • how it is collected, or
  • how the revenue is allocated and overseen.

The move to amend the law comes amid broader government efforts to strengthen revenue collection and compliance, including updates provided to Cabinet on the work of the Drag-Net Steering Committee — a multi-agency initiative focused on improving government revenue systems.

The lack of detail surrounding the amendments leaves several key questions unanswered, particularly given the fee’s direct impact on both visitors and residents and its role in supporting the country’s tourism economy.

Any changes to the Act would require further legislative steps, including presentation to the House of Assembly, before taking effect.

For now, the Cabinet’s approval signals that the government is moving to revise a policy that is already in force — but without yet disclosing how those revisions will alter the current system.

As tourism remains the backbone of the Turks and Caicos Islands economy, clarity on the future of the Destination Management Fee — and the framework it supports — is expected to be closely watched in the weeks ahead.

Developed by Deandrea Hamilton • with ChatGPT (AI) • edited by Magnetic Media.

Photo Credit: TCIAA

Continue Reading

FIND US ON FACEBOOK

TRENDING