Connect with us

News

Deliberations Begin in SIPT, but no date given for VERDICTS of Four Accused

Published

on

By Wilkie Arthur

Freelance Court Reporter

 

 

#TurksandCaicos, June 22, 2023 – Magnetic Media watching for nearly seven hours via YouTube, the final day of closing remarks or speeches to her Ladyship The Hon Chief Justice Ms. Mable Agyemang, on Friday 16th June, 2023.

The Prosecution had the final word or the right to the last reply before the Judge retired to begin her deliberations.

In rendering that ‘last reply’, the Prosecution maintained  that despite some of the defense counsels attempts to stop his final words in the judge-only trial, it will be delivered.  Additionally, Andrew Mitchell, the defense counsel complained that the court was in breach of her Ladyship previous order/ judgement and in breach of section 42 of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance which gives the Crown the “right of reply” which is the final say to the judge or jury before considering a verdict.

The Hon Chief Justice (CJ) having heard the SIPT lead King’s Counsel prosecutor, questioned, one of the defense King’s Counsel Mr.Earl Witter via link as he was not present in court in person, regarding his correctional response submission and that he did it without leave of the court.

Her Ladyship said to Witter, KC that ‘you were given my orders previously along these lines and this is very disrespectful to me and this court to totally disobey my orders which is in line with the statutory provision.’

Senior KC Witter, when invited to speak by the learned CJ, told her ladyship that he was profoundly sorry and apologizes strongly for his actions against her ladyships’ order. He explained, it was nothing deliberately done.

Her Ladyship then proceeded to ask all the other defense King’s Counsels if they had followed her order; but save for except one, made it clear that he so did. All others were uncertain as to if they did or did not. The CJ then directed that she will disregard and not read any of the defenses’ correctional submissions for now unless she changes her mind later on.

Following this, lead prosecutor Mr. Andrew Mitchell KC, begun to outline his closing remarks in some areas individually regarding each defendant and in some areas collectively.

FLOYD HALL, JEFFREY HALL, MELBOURNE WILSON and CLAYTON GREEN heard the Prosecutor relived this very long case with his presentation to the court. He told the CJ that in her deliberations, she must remind herself of:-

  • The defendants’ good character and he provided authoritative guidelines on how she should approach it.

  • He reminded her about the burden of proof.

  • He reminded her about “lies” and how she should treat lies, also  providing her Ladyship with case authorities and support.

  • He reminded her Ladyship about delays and how although this trial is many years old, the delays should not affect her judgment or her decision, and he provided case authorities in support of his point.

  • He reminded the court that only Mr Jeffrey Hall did not give evidence/testify and that should not be used against him adversely because it was his right to refuse to testify.

  • He reminded her Ladyship that each accused must be considered separately on each charge according to the evidence.

We heard about a number of different figures pertaining to the allegations and charges of suspicious and questionable money transactions against the four such as:-

= $77,000.00 (suspicious money transaction)

= $267,000.00 (Loan to Alden Smith aka Smokey)

= $200,000.00 (Deposited into TCI bank)

= $100,000.00 (questionable monies)

And some mentioned in the millions.

In Mr. Mitchell KC closing he asked her Ladyship if she can give a date when she will return with her verdict and she replied you would appreciate the magnitude of the task I have, so I’ll say nothing but when I see my way clear I’ll send word. She then thanked all counsel and their teams from:-

Mr. Andrew Mitchell KC for the crown.

Mr. Earl Witter KC for Floyd Hall.

Mr. Ian Wilkinson KC for Jeffrey Hall.

Mr. Richard Bendall for Clayton Greene.

And

Mr. Alair Shepherd KC for Melbourne Wilson

 

Corrected: June 26, 2023

Bahamas News

Mother’s Pride Headlines Bahamian Takeover at Sixers-Heat Clash in Miami

Published

on

The Bahamas, March 30, 2026 – The voice of a proud mother captured the spirit of a nation Monday night, as Bendra Rolle shared heartfelt reflections on the overwhelming Bahamian support for her son, VJ Edgecombe, during the Philadelphia 76ers matchup against the Miami Heat in Miami.

“The patriotic support and scenery at my son, VJ Edgecombe’s NBA game… was overwhelming,” Rolle said in a statement issued following the game. “The arena in Miami was lit. Bimini and the Bahamas showed up and showed out.”

Her words come amid what has already been widely described as a remarkable showing of national pride, with Bahamians traveling in large numbers to South Florida to witness the young guard’s continued rise. For Rolle, however, the moment extended far beyond basketball.

“Beyond VJ’s basketball talents, I’m so moved by his magnetic personality and personal journey to inspire and excite an entire nation—our beloved Bahamas,” she said. “I thank God for VJ’s humility and for his hunger for greatness. He never forgets how far God has brought us.”

While the Sixers did not secure the win on the night, Edgecombe delivered a solid individual performance, finishing with 13 points and five assists. He made an early impact on the game, showing confidence and poise before foul trouble disrupted his rhythm, but still managed to leave his mark in meaningful minutes.

The game itself evolved into a cultural showcase, with Bahamian flags waving throughout the arena and chants ringing out in support of Edgecombe. Much of that presence was bolstered by a coordinated travel push from Bahamasair, which helped facilitate fan travel and added to the electric atmosphere in Miami.

Rolle said the emotional weight of the moment was deeply felt by her family, as they witnessed firsthand the unity and pride of the Bahamian people.

“Thanks and love for the tears and overwhelming joy on Monday, Bahamas,” she expressed. “The Bahamian flags were love, loud, and proud. On my own behalf, VJ, and the entire family, I am ever grateful for the indescribable experience.”

Her closing words underscored what many have described as the true victory of the night—not the final score, but the powerful display of national pride and support surrounding one of The Bahamas’ rising stars.

Continue Reading

News

50 Years of Ministerial Government: Cabinet Moves to Mark Milestone Rooted in 1976 Constitution

Published

on

Turks and Caicos, March 30, 2026 – The Turks and Caicos Islands is preparing to mark a major political milestone, with Cabinet approving the establishment of a National Commemorative Committee to celebrate 50 years of ministerial government, a system first introduced under the 1976 Constitution.

The decision, confirmed in the February 10 Post Cabinet statement, signals a year of reflection on a governance model that fundamentally reshaped how the country is run — shifting from direct colonial administration toward locally led political leadership.

That shift was formalized in the Turks and Caicos Islands Constitution Order 1976, which laid the legal foundation for ministerial government and introduced a structured Executive and Legislative system.

At its core, the 1976 Constitution established an Executive Council, bringing together:

  • a Governor,
  • a Chief Minister elected by members of the Legislative Council,
  • and Ministers appointed to assist in governing the Islands.

A Very Different Government Back Then

If today’s Cabinet feels crowded, the 1976 version would have seemed almost unbelievable. There were just three Ministers serving alongside the Chief Minister — a tight, compact leadership team responsible for the affairs of an entire country. No sprawling list of ministries, no long roster of portfolios — just a handful of individuals carrying the weight of governance.

Becoming a Minister wasn’t a direct vote of the people either. You first had to win a seat in the Legislative Council, and from there, the Chief Minister would recommend who should serve. The Governor then made the appointments. In other words, political trust and alignment mattered just as much as public support — and ultimate authority still rested above the local leadership.

And as for job security? There wasn’t much of it. Ministers served without fixed terms and could be removed if they lost their seat, resigned, or if the Governor revoked their appointment. Even the Chief Minister could be ousted through a vote of no confidence. Add to that the basic requirements — being at least 21, a British subject, and meeting residency rules — and it’s clear that ministerial government in 1976 was not only smaller, but far more tightly controlled.

This marked the first time elected representatives were formally given defined roles in the administration of national affairs.

Under the Constitution, the Governor retained overarching authority, but was required in many instances to act on the advice of the Executive Council, particularly in shaping policy and overseeing government operations.

The Chief Minister, meanwhile, was positioned as the central political leader, responsible for directing government business and advising on the appointment of Ministers.

Importantly, the Constitution also allowed for the assignment of responsibilities to Ministers, giving them oversight of specific areas of government — a structure that remains at the heart of today’s Cabinet system.

Section 13 of the Order made clear that Ministers could be assigned responsibility for the administration of departments or government business, embedding accountability and functional governance into the system.

The Legislative Council, established alongside the Executive, provided the law-making body, with elected and appointed members participating in debates, passing legislation, and representing the interests of the Islands.

Together, these provisions created the framework for what is now recognized as ministerial government — a hybrid system balancing local political leadership with constitutional oversight by the Governor.

The explanatory note of the 1976 Order describes it as introducing “new provisions for the Government of the Turks and Caicos Islands,” including the creation of a Legislative Council with elected members and Ministers appointed on the advice of the Chief Minister.

Fifty years on, that structure has evolved through subsequent constitutional changes, but its foundation remains rooted in the 1976 framework.

Cabinet’s decision to establish a commemorative committee suggests that the anniversary will not only celebrate political progress, but also invite reflection on how effectively the system has delivered on its promise of representation, accountability, and governance.

As the Islands approach this Golden Jubilee, attention is likely to turn not only to the achievements of ministerial government, but also to the ongoing question of how the system continues to serve a modern and rapidly developing Turks and Caicos Islands.

Developed by Deandrea Hamilton • with ChatGPT (AI) • edited by Magnetic Media.

Continue Reading

News

Government Moves to Amend Destination Management Fee Law

Published

on

Turks and Caicos, March 30, 2026 – The Turks and Caicos Islands Government has signaled changes to its tourism funding framework, with Cabinet approving draft amendments to the Destination Management Fee Act 2023.

The decision was confirmed in the Post Cabinet statement following the February 5 meeting, chaired by Governor Dileeni Daniel-Selvaratnam, where members agreed to move forward with revisions to the law governing the collection and administration of the fee.

The Destination Management Fee, introduced in 2023, is applied to travelers entering the country and is embedded within the cost of travel. The charge was designed to support tourism-related development, including marketing, infrastructure, and sustainability initiatives.

At the time of its introduction, the fee was linked to the establishment of a Destination Management and Marketing Organisation (DMMO), which was expected to coordinate tourism strategy and enhance the visitor experience.

However, recent developments have shifted that landscape.

The DMMO has since been discontinued, raising new questions about how funds generated through the fee are being managed and what structure will now guide tourism development efforts.

The Cabinet note does not outline what specific changes are being proposed under the amended legislation.

It also does not indicate whether adjustments will be made to:

  • who pays the fee,
  • how it is collected, or
  • how the revenue is allocated and overseen.

The move to amend the law comes amid broader government efforts to strengthen revenue collection and compliance, including updates provided to Cabinet on the work of the Drag-Net Steering Committee — a multi-agency initiative focused on improving government revenue systems.

The lack of detail surrounding the amendments leaves several key questions unanswered, particularly given the fee’s direct impact on both visitors and residents and its role in supporting the country’s tourism economy.

Any changes to the Act would require further legislative steps, including presentation to the House of Assembly, before taking effect.

For now, the Cabinet’s approval signals that the government is moving to revise a policy that is already in force — but without yet disclosing how those revisions will alter the current system.

As tourism remains the backbone of the Turks and Caicos Islands economy, clarity on the future of the Destination Management Fee — and the framework it supports — is expected to be closely watched in the weeks ahead.

Developed by Deandrea Hamilton • with ChatGPT (AI) • edited by Magnetic Media.

Photo Credit: TCIAA

Continue Reading

FIND US ON FACEBOOK

TRENDING