By Rashaed Esson with Deandrea Hamilton
Editorial Staff
#USA, April 6, 2023 – It is known that many would love to see former President of the United States, Donald Trump charged for the 34 felony counts to which he pleaded not guilty. The charges are linked to alleged payments or ‘hush money’ to keep off the front pages any negative news reports which could hurt Trump’s chances of winning the 2016 Presidential election; he did win and now Alvin Leonard Bragg, New York County District Attorney says that win was doctored by suppression of information and the payouts are illegal.
The case seems damning, but it is a commonly held belief not just by Trump supporters but also liberals, that the case against the former US president lacks backbone.
Many of his ‘hardcore supporters’ gathered near the court and rallied against Trump’s indictment, some calling the case an injustice.
The case is also referred to as a political ‘witch hunt’.
But reported by some media to a lesser degree, is that pundits and others who contribute to political dialogue see the charges against Donald Trump as old news, with a strong likelihood of being tossed out due to its frivolity.
“It’s underwhelming. There is not more to it, there are not more violations, tax violations, there is not an incredible new set of facts that we didn’t know about publicly. It’s really, the facts of the case as they have existed, for basically almost 7 years,” offered a CNN political analyst.
She also describes the case as underwhelming given its nature and being brought against a former president.
Bill Barr, former Attorney General, also stated the facts of the case are not new information. It has been available for years now. He highlighted in an interview that he hasn’t heard anything that was not anticipated.
He said, “Prosecution should always involve a measure of discretionary judgment where you weigh the public interest as a whole.”
The attorney offered that the evidence on Trump should be concrete and resistant to debate before they bring a case against a President, sitting president or former president.
“There should be clear evidence of a real crime, there shouldn’t be a debatable crime. The evidence should be strong.”
Intimating that he does not believe the case is rock solid.
“And also, this is not just by virtue of his prior office but he’s a candidate in the current election, so this is a charge [in] that affects our current national politics and judgment there, it seems to me in prosecutorial discretion, should commend caution in this circumstance and as I said, this appears to be just a pathetically weak case,” he added.
John Bolton is yet another official labeling the case against the leading Republican candidate for the next general election, who is also enjoying a boost in popularity since the indictment on Tuesday, as weak.
Bolton described the case as “weaker than he feared it would be.” He believes that the case is easily dismissible and predicts a ‘quick acquittal for Trump.”