Deandrea Hamilton
Editor
Turks and Caicos, March 22, 2025 – The Supreme Court Justice weighed in and the decision gives a consequential round one victory to the People’s Democratic Movement (PDM) party which believes corruption and a failure to follow the letter of the law led to a questionable election outcome; their claim has validity now as Hon Chris Selochan, Supreme Court Justice has ruled that the matter must proceed to trial.
The PDM filed the petition through their attorney George Missick of Geordins Law Firm. The lion’s share of their petition centered around their claim that the Elections Office failed to follow the precise specifications for ballots as described in the Elections Ordinance. The other outcry accused the Progressive National Party (PNP) of buying votes to win the House.
On the latter point, the PDM found its case was too weak.
His Lordship Selochan determined there was insufficient evidence in the allegation that the PNP bought or bribed voters to return them to office. On their more substantial point, however, the Judge agreed that there was a case to answer by the government following the February 7, 2025 general election.
Edwin Astwood and Robert Been, the PDM’s Leader and Deputy leader, filed the petition which has now gained traction and renewed attention due to this validating supreme court decision to progress to trial.
Now, minds are racing, and tongues are wagging as residents wonder if it could really be proven that the entire electorate voted incorrectly and if so, will his lordship rule that the General Election be carried out again.
What is clearly outlined in the amended ordinance is there should be two ballots. Each ballot should be of a different colour. Each ballot should hold distinguishing information – including occupation – about each candidates offering to hold a parliamentary seat and each ballot must be published ahead of the national poll.
In the 2025 General Election, which was the first to be held using electronic tabulating machines, there was one ballot paper.
Eagle Legal News Media, which heavily focuses on court reporting in the Turks and Caicos Islands, provided some insight.
“His Lordship, the Hon Mr. Justice Chris Selochan refused the Attorney General’s application to strike out the election petition by Hon Edwin Astwood and Mr. Robert Been, the matter will go to trial,” as shared on social media platforms.
Turks and Caicos Attorney General, Rhondalee Braithwaite Knowles, KC and Akierra Missick, who is the Senior Civil attorney representing the PNP both submitted arguments to strike out certain portions of the PDM election petitions.
“…in the areas where they alleged corruption and bribery against the PNP for failing to meet the procedural requirements of the Elections Ordinance.”
It is understood by Magnetic Media, the PDM was unable to provide material witnesses to corroborate or prove their allegation of individuals being bribed or “treated” for votes.
On Friday, we learned that the Attorney General’s Chambers has withdrawn an application to have the PDM case related to alleged discrepancies in the Blue Hills district vote, dropped.
“This follows the failure of a similar strike out application, CL 15/25, the Election Petition brought by Edwin Astwood and Robert Been, which was dismissed yesterday in relation to issues with the ballots and voting process.”
The Attorney General was ordered to pay two thirds of the PDM’s legal costs attached to her, now withdrawn application.
As for what happens now, a popular social media pundit – Eugene Arthur – reflects much of the public discourse well.
“If the election was conducted in full compliance with the law, why would the government be so eager to avoid judicial review?
The judge’s ruling sends a powerful message: no political party, and certainly no Attorney General is above electoral scrutiny. The case will now proceed to trial, where the people of the TCI will finally get the transparency, they deserve.”