Connect with us

News

Money transfer centers in TCI, are they supporting or inhibiting potential economic growth?

Published

on

#TurksandCaicos, July 20, 2022 – Shocked but not surprised. This is how I would describe the amount of outgoing remittances from TCI. I never grasped the gravity nor the dynamics of these independent financial outlets until recently. This sector continues to evolve, but not necessarily in the best interest of our country.

Financial remittances have long been recognized as an important developmental vehicle associated with migration.  It is commonly known as the money or goods that migrants send back to families and friends in countries of origin. 

Remittances is a very lucrative business and over the years has been an integral part of the Caribbean culture. It could also be considered a major contributor to the economies in the region.

I would imagine, for some countries, remittance flows for many migrant families can become an economic lifeline. 

New platforms such as online transfer services, digital wallets and mobile money applications are becoming more and more prevalent.  With these online platforms, it will be even more difficult to monitor the true outflow of remittances.

In the latter part of 2019, the Financial Services Commission(FSC) website provided information from three institutions and the numbers were staggering. The institutions are CAM, NCS eMoney Services (which operates as MoneyGram) and The Money Centre by Fidelity, which is also known as Western Union. Vigo®, a Western Union money transfer brand.

According to a report published in 2021 by TCIsun newspaper, despite the downturn in the economy, in 2020, a staggering $105 million USD was sent out of the Turks and Caicos Islands through money transfers.

The FSC figures revealed, the majority of the transactions, $36.3 million was sent to Haiti, followed by $26 million to the Dominican Republic, $11.4 million to Jamaica, $10.3 million to the Philippines, $1.3 million to the Bahamas, $1.2 million to the United Kingdom (UK), $9 million to the United States of America (USA) and $8.1 million to other countries.

Haiti and the Dominican Republic were again the largest receivers of outbound funds, together accounting for over 50 percent of the figures. 

Most remittances are primarily used for consumption, including, for instance the purchases of food, consumer goods, health care and housing.  However, based on the significance of the cash outflow in addition to the increase in illegal immigration, it calls into question the relationship between illegal entry and outgoing remittances.

Due to privacy laws and the way data is collected and reported, it may not provide as much information to identify the true receivers and end users.  With the level of outgoing financial activity, it makes our local banks look like check checking centers or staging area before transfer.

It would be intriguing to see what the remittance figures represented in terms of the impact on total gross domestic product (GDP) for TCI.

As a country, how do we slow down the outflow of funds precisely at a time when we want individuals and businesses to get out there and spend, so more of the money is circulating within our own economy?

As a way to heighten more awareness around this issue, why not set up a think tank committee to conduct a comprehensive study? This could help to determine the driving force behind immigrants not wanting to reinvest a larger portion of their earnings in TCI. 

Generally speaking, owning real estate is a sign of progress for many immigrant families.  Perhaps, the hesitation to invest in this area could be in part due to some local land owners allowing squatting for a nominal fee. 

Furthermore, the lack of adequate code enforcement and or allowing low accommodation standards in the country, this makes it easier for renters to live in substandard housing. 

As a result, there is no compelling need for any real individual investment, while allowing more money to be sent out of the country.

In my opinion, it goes right back to the fundamentals, failure to set strict industry standards, improving housing regulations and inspecting what is expected etc.

Would a more comprehensive immigration reform benefit in one form or another in terms of citizenship eligibility?

Offering Amnesty or any sort of immunity is a quagmire for any country. Although, I believe at some point it will become inevitable in TCI. This is one way to ensure the working class is paying their fair share into the system to offset medical expenses and the cost of other social services. 

With TCI recently introducing a new form of indirect taxation, it is evident that the money transfer sector would be a prime source from which the Ministry of Finance can consider increasing levy on.

The last report that was made available by TCI FSC, the vast discrepancy between total inflows and total outflows underscores the shortcomings of remittance data, and leaves one to believe the loyalty to our country for some is rather marginal.

What would be even more impactful is, if Government required more transparency on these institutions, like source of funds etc. 

Albeit, this will need to be accross the board, to include white-collar workers and capitalist who move money freely through bank wire transfers and drafts.

With TCI having a free enterprise market, pundits would argue there are a plethora of reasons why this would be socially unjust to foreigners. 

Consequently, at the end of the day, you can’t have your cake and eat it too.

I concur with a recent statement made by Premier Washington Misick, in which he said “The TCI has to develop a robust internal economy that allows money to pass through as many hands as possible”. To his point, this is not happening.

The government must create an enabling environment to encourage work permit holders and other foreign nationals to stem the outflow of remittances so more of the money is spent toward productive sectors of our economy.

The burning question is, do we have a bold enough politician with the political will to introduce such initiative in the house of assembly?

My final thought is, in order to leverage the true development benefits of financial and social remittances, a comprehensive and in-depth financial analysis must be done.

I’m afraid that without the ability to reign in this level of outflow activity, over time, it could become damaging to our country’s competitiveness in the world market place or the broader economy.

 

Ed Forbes,

Concerned citizen of Grand Turk 

Continue Reading

Bahamas News

Mother’s Pride Headlines Bahamian Takeover at Sixers-Heat Clash in Miami

Published

on

The Bahamas, March 30, 2026 – The voice of a proud mother captured the spirit of a nation Monday night, as Bendra Rolle shared heartfelt reflections on the overwhelming Bahamian support for her son, VJ Edgecombe, during the Philadelphia 76ers matchup against the Miami Heat in Miami.

“The patriotic support and scenery at my son, VJ Edgecombe’s NBA game… was overwhelming,” Rolle said in a statement issued following the game. “The arena in Miami was lit. Bimini and the Bahamas showed up and showed out.”

Her words come amid what has already been widely described as a remarkable showing of national pride, with Bahamians traveling in large numbers to South Florida to witness the young guard’s continued rise. For Rolle, however, the moment extended far beyond basketball.

“Beyond VJ’s basketball talents, I’m so moved by his magnetic personality and personal journey to inspire and excite an entire nation—our beloved Bahamas,” she said. “I thank God for VJ’s humility and for his hunger for greatness. He never forgets how far God has brought us.”

While the Sixers did not secure the win on the night, Edgecombe delivered a solid individual performance, finishing with 13 points and five assists. He made an early impact on the game, showing confidence and poise before foul trouble disrupted his rhythm, but still managed to leave his mark in meaningful minutes.

The game itself evolved into a cultural showcase, with Bahamian flags waving throughout the arena and chants ringing out in support of Edgecombe. Much of that presence was bolstered by a coordinated travel push from Bahamasair, which helped facilitate fan travel and added to the electric atmosphere in Miami.

Rolle said the emotional weight of the moment was deeply felt by her family, as they witnessed firsthand the unity and pride of the Bahamian people.

“Thanks and love for the tears and overwhelming joy on Monday, Bahamas,” she expressed. “The Bahamian flags were love, loud, and proud. On my own behalf, VJ, and the entire family, I am ever grateful for the indescribable experience.”

Her closing words underscored what many have described as the true victory of the night—not the final score, but the powerful display of national pride and support surrounding one of The Bahamas’ rising stars.

Continue Reading

News

50 Years of Ministerial Government: Cabinet Moves to Mark Milestone Rooted in 1976 Constitution

Published

on

Turks and Caicos, March 30, 2026 – The Turks and Caicos Islands is preparing to mark a major political milestone, with Cabinet approving the establishment of a National Commemorative Committee to celebrate 50 years of ministerial government, a system first introduced under the 1976 Constitution.

The decision, confirmed in the February 10 Post Cabinet statement, signals a year of reflection on a governance model that fundamentally reshaped how the country is run — shifting from direct colonial administration toward locally led political leadership.

That shift was formalized in the Turks and Caicos Islands Constitution Order 1976, which laid the legal foundation for ministerial government and introduced a structured Executive and Legislative system.

At its core, the 1976 Constitution established an Executive Council, bringing together:

  • a Governor,
  • a Chief Minister elected by members of the Legislative Council,
  • and Ministers appointed to assist in governing the Islands.

A Very Different Government Back Then

If today’s Cabinet feels crowded, the 1976 version would have seemed almost unbelievable. There were just three Ministers serving alongside the Chief Minister — a tight, compact leadership team responsible for the affairs of an entire country. No sprawling list of ministries, no long roster of portfolios — just a handful of individuals carrying the weight of governance.

Becoming a Minister wasn’t a direct vote of the people either. You first had to win a seat in the Legislative Council, and from there, the Chief Minister would recommend who should serve. The Governor then made the appointments. In other words, political trust and alignment mattered just as much as public support — and ultimate authority still rested above the local leadership.

And as for job security? There wasn’t much of it. Ministers served without fixed terms and could be removed if they lost their seat, resigned, or if the Governor revoked their appointment. Even the Chief Minister could be ousted through a vote of no confidence. Add to that the basic requirements — being at least 21, a British subject, and meeting residency rules — and it’s clear that ministerial government in 1976 was not only smaller, but far more tightly controlled.

This marked the first time elected representatives were formally given defined roles in the administration of national affairs.

Under the Constitution, the Governor retained overarching authority, but was required in many instances to act on the advice of the Executive Council, particularly in shaping policy and overseeing government operations.

The Chief Minister, meanwhile, was positioned as the central political leader, responsible for directing government business and advising on the appointment of Ministers.

Importantly, the Constitution also allowed for the assignment of responsibilities to Ministers, giving them oversight of specific areas of government — a structure that remains at the heart of today’s Cabinet system.

Section 13 of the Order made clear that Ministers could be assigned responsibility for the administration of departments or government business, embedding accountability and functional governance into the system.

The Legislative Council, established alongside the Executive, provided the law-making body, with elected and appointed members participating in debates, passing legislation, and representing the interests of the Islands.

Together, these provisions created the framework for what is now recognized as ministerial government — a hybrid system balancing local political leadership with constitutional oversight by the Governor.

The explanatory note of the 1976 Order describes it as introducing “new provisions for the Government of the Turks and Caicos Islands,” including the creation of a Legislative Council with elected members and Ministers appointed on the advice of the Chief Minister.

Fifty years on, that structure has evolved through subsequent constitutional changes, but its foundation remains rooted in the 1976 framework.

Cabinet’s decision to establish a commemorative committee suggests that the anniversary will not only celebrate political progress, but also invite reflection on how effectively the system has delivered on its promise of representation, accountability, and governance.

As the Islands approach this Golden Jubilee, attention is likely to turn not only to the achievements of ministerial government, but also to the ongoing question of how the system continues to serve a modern and rapidly developing Turks and Caicos Islands.

Developed by Deandrea Hamilton • with ChatGPT (AI) • edited by Magnetic Media.

Continue Reading

News

Government Moves to Amend Destination Management Fee Law

Published

on

Turks and Caicos, March 30, 2026 – The Turks and Caicos Islands Government has signaled changes to its tourism funding framework, with Cabinet approving draft amendments to the Destination Management Fee Act 2023.

The decision was confirmed in the Post Cabinet statement following the February 5 meeting, chaired by Governor Dileeni Daniel-Selvaratnam, where members agreed to move forward with revisions to the law governing the collection and administration of the fee.

The Destination Management Fee, introduced in 2023, is applied to travelers entering the country and is embedded within the cost of travel. The charge was designed to support tourism-related development, including marketing, infrastructure, and sustainability initiatives.

At the time of its introduction, the fee was linked to the establishment of a Destination Management and Marketing Organisation (DMMO), which was expected to coordinate tourism strategy and enhance the visitor experience.

However, recent developments have shifted that landscape.

The DMMO has since been discontinued, raising new questions about how funds generated through the fee are being managed and what structure will now guide tourism development efforts.

The Cabinet note does not outline what specific changes are being proposed under the amended legislation.

It also does not indicate whether adjustments will be made to:

  • who pays the fee,
  • how it is collected, or
  • how the revenue is allocated and overseen.

The move to amend the law comes amid broader government efforts to strengthen revenue collection and compliance, including updates provided to Cabinet on the work of the Drag-Net Steering Committee — a multi-agency initiative focused on improving government revenue systems.

The lack of detail surrounding the amendments leaves several key questions unanswered, particularly given the fee’s direct impact on both visitors and residents and its role in supporting the country’s tourism economy.

Any changes to the Act would require further legislative steps, including presentation to the House of Assembly, before taking effect.

For now, the Cabinet’s approval signals that the government is moving to revise a policy that is already in force — but without yet disclosing how those revisions will alter the current system.

As tourism remains the backbone of the Turks and Caicos Islands economy, clarity on the future of the Destination Management Fee — and the framework it supports — is expected to be closely watched in the weeks ahead.

Developed by Deandrea Hamilton • with ChatGPT (AI) • edited by Magnetic Media.

Photo Credit: TCIAA

Continue Reading

FIND US ON FACEBOOK

TRENDING