Connect with us

TCI News

MM Clean Campaign – What is Littering

Published

on

October 11, 2018 – Litter is nothing but a piece of waste or rubbish that has been disposed improperly, without consent and at wrong location. Littering simply means throwing away objects on the ground or leaving them lying on the ground instead of disposing them at garbage can, recycling bin or trash container. The waste that originates from houses, industries, factories should be placed either in recycling bin or waste to energy plant or at a site meant for disposing garbage.

Litter can originate from construction and demolition sites, households, uncovered trucks, pedestrians, and moving vehicles.  Apart from that, unavailability of garbage bins and being too lazy to walk to a  trash container are other reasons for littering.  Uncovered trucks, pedestrians and moving vehicles are some other

As far as littering effects are concerned, it has economic, legal and environmental impact in the form of spending millions of dollars in cleaning up litter, huge fine if caught littering from vehicle and damage to our surroundings that can have effect on plants and animals and can cause loss to the local tourism industry.

Plain and simply, littering is wrong.  We have trash and garbage cans for a reason, so why throw away your trash on the ground when you could throw it away in its intended place?  People still litter, largely for the following reasons:

–          Laziness

–          The area is already messy, why bother finding a trash can?

–          People don’t realize that with littering, there do come consequences

–          The garbage cans are already overflowing

–          My neighbor litters, so do I!

–          Really? It’s just one paper!

–          People are starving in Africa! What do you care about littering?

–          The garbage can is too far away

The list could really go on forever.  People come up with countless excuses to throw their piece of trash down on the ground instead of taking the short amount of time to find a garbage can and properly throw it away. But littering does have consequences, and here are some facts that may surprise you.  They include, but are not limited to, ecological, financial and lawful consequences:

Facts About Littering

  • Household waste, industrial waste, construction waste and other like packaging waste are most common types of sources of litter.

 

  • It doesn’t look to nice.  Places with high littering are also often riddled with crime, less values on homes and property, and are more likely to be the site of fires.  You could ultimately end up losing money on your house.

 

  • Litter on the ground degrades natural areas and kills plants and animals.  All that it takes is for a cat to get stuck in a bottle or a bird getting caught up in a soda can holder.

 

  • Billions of tons of litter are dumped into the ocean each year, and it is more than the 250 million trashes that is being generated each year too. When you toss your garbage on the sidewalk or on the highway, you may in reality be throwing it away into the Atlantic. This leads to the repeated killing of fish on a daily basis and the gradual depletion of marine life.  Believe it or not, the litter we produce are causing more underwater species to become endangered.

 

  • Cigarette butts make up over half of our littered objects, and they take a grand total of ten years to decompose because of a cellulose acetate, contrary to the popular perception that cigarette butts decompose very quickly in only a matter of days. In reality, cigarette butts are a serious threat to the environment.

 

  • The main causes of littering are laziness, ignorance, people don’t realize the effects of littering, the bins are dirty and not big enough, there are enough bins and moreover those bins aren’t emptied often enough, poor parenting and education, there is no fine for littering, one person can’t make a difference, no sense of pride, not bothered about effects of littering.

 

  • The most common littered objects include the following in descending order: fast food, paper, aluminium, glass, and plastic.  It turns out someone would rather toss their burger wrapper and empty soda on the street than find a garbage can, and not surprisingly, this is done on roadside and highways.

 

  • Litter can be controlled.  People need to be educated regarding ill effects of littering. Education plays an important role here. Children needs to be taught at elementary level as how littering can can cause environmental impact. They can also teach others they see littering and and teach them to dispose of garbage the right way.

 

  • Litter is smelly and dirty and can be dangerous and unhealthy for our environment. It affects communities and people who live there. It could be poisonous for plants and animals. It can have a severe impact on tourism.

 

  • Fast food wrappers and aluminium cans are two most common type of items that are found while cleaning litter.

 

  • Litter when not covered on a truck bed can cause it to blow out without the driver knowing.

 

  • Do not throw litter from a vehicle as it may cause damage to surroundings and can have a bad effect on local tourism industry.

 

  • Litter can hamper economic development of a community.  When new businesses look for a dynamic growing community where their businesses can grow, they would hardly be interested in setting up new ventures, if they see a lot of litter around.

 

  • Reducing litter is just a 3 step process: stop littering, pick up litter, report if you find someone littering illegally.

 

Article: Conserve Energy Future

Continue Reading

News

Better Products, Safer Services Targeted Under National Quality Plan

Published

on

Government Advances Policy Aimed at Consumer Protection and Higher Business Standards

 

By Deandrea Hamilton

PROVIDENCIALES, Turks and Caicos Islands — Efforts to improve product quality, strengthen consumer protections and raise business standards across the Turks and Caicos Islands are moving into a new phase as government advances implementation of its National Quality Policy.

The Department of Trade, Industry and Fair Competition announced that a team of consultants spent a week in the Turks and Caicos Islands meeting with key public and private sector stakeholders as part of the policy’s implementation process.

Approved by Cabinet in October 2024, the National Quality Policy is designed to establish a national quality infrastructure that supports trade, protects consumers and improves the competitiveness of local businesses.

For consumers, the long-term goal is straightforward: greater confidence that products and services meet accepted standards for quality, safety and reliability.

For businesses, the initiative aims to encourage stronger quality management systems that can improve efficiency, build customer trust and create opportunities for expansion into regional and international markets.

During the May 25 to 29 mission, consultants met with representatives from the National Quality Council, Pelican Energy TCI, the Turks and Caicos Islands Airports Authority, the TCI Government Laboratory, the Turks and Caicos Hotel and Tourism Association and Turks Head Brewery.

According to the Department, the consultations were intended to assess existing quality-related systems, identify gaps and gather recommendations that will help shape the Territory’s national quality infrastructure.

“The policy serves as a strategic framework for establishing a national quality infrastructure in the Turks and Caicos Islands, aimed at improving quality standards, supporting trade, protecting consumers, and enhancing economic competitiveness,” the Department said in a statement.

Officials explained that stakeholder feedback will help determine what systems, standards and programmes are needed to strengthen quality assurance across various sectors of the economy.

The Department said the information gathered will guide the next stage of implementation and help ensure the policy delivers meaningful benefits throughout the Islands.

Among the initiatives expected to emerge from the process are a Quality Certification Programme and a series of educational workshops designed to help businesses understand and adopt quality standards.

A second round of stakeholder consultations is scheduled for June, allowing government and industry representatives to continue discussions and further assess priority areas identified during the initial mission.

Officials say the ultimate objective is to build a culture of quality that benefits consumers, businesses and the wider economy by encouraging higher standards, greater accountability and improved competitiveness.

Angle by Deandrea Hamilton. Built with ChatGPT (AI). Magnetic Media — CAPTURING LIFE.

 

Continue Reading

News

240 Migrants Interdicted in TCI Waters; Regiment says Mission Averted Potential Maritime Tragedy

Published

on

By Deandrea Hamilton

PROVIDENCIALES, Turks and Caicos Islands — Startling video released by U.S. Customs and Border Protection showing hundreds of suspected Haitian migrants crammed aboard an overloaded vessel has renewed concerns about the worsening migration crisis in the region and the increasing pressure being placed on the Turks and Caicos Islands.

The vessel, carrying 240 irregular migrants, was intercepted in Turks and Caicos waters on the night of May 31, in a joint operation involving the Turks and Caicos Islands Regiment, the Royal Turks and Caicos Islands Police Force, the TCI Border Force, the United States Coast Guard and U.S. Customs and Border Protection Air and Marine Operations.

Earlier reports from U.S. authorities revealed that the vessel was discovered in a dangerously overcrowded condition and was ultimately secured and escorted to shore by local marine officers.

Now, a newly released statement from the Turks and Caicos Islands Regiment sheds additional light on the operation and the risks involved.

According to the Regiment, Patrol Vessel James Fulford interdicted the vessel at approximately 9:33 p.m. within territorial waters before authorities determined the situation was far more serious than a routine migrant interception.

“Upon evaluating the migrant vessel, the Royal Turks and Caicos Islands Police Force immediately upgraded the operation to a critical incident, prioritizing Safety of Life at Sea protocols to avert a maritime disaster,” the statement explained.

The migrants were identified as 191 adult males, 44 adult females, one male minor and four female minors.

All 240 individuals were safely transferred to authorities for processing, health assessments and security screening.

Lieutenant Colonel Ennis Grant, Commanding Officer of the TCI Regiment, praised the coordinated response among local and international agencies.

“This mission underscores the efficacy of our multi-agency partnerships. The rapid transition of this operation from a standard interdiction task to a high-priority Safety of Life at Sea intervention demonstrates the professionalism and readiness of our joint forces. By working in seamless tandem with our U.S. partners, we successfully prevented a potential maritime tragedy.”

The incident highlights the continuing humanitarian and security challenges facing the Turks and Caicos Islands as instability, gang violence and economic hardship continue to drive migration from Haiti.

While much larger nations often dominate regional migration discussions, the latest interdiction demonstrates the outsized role the Turks and Caicos Islands continues to play on the front line of Caribbean migration enforcement.

The Regiment said it remains committed to securing the country’s maritime borders through persistent surveillance and strong inter-agency cooperation.

The interception is among the largest migrant landings recorded in the Turks and Caicos Islands this year and serves as another reminder of the dangerous journeys many Haitians continue to undertake in search of safety and opportunity.

Angle by Deandrea Hamilton. Built with ChatGPT (AI). Magnetic Media — CAPTURING LIFE.

Continue Reading

News

How Misick Fell Short of The UN’s Worst Corruption Standard

Published

on

Judge Cites Kofi Annan, But Finds No Evidence Defendants Caused the Wider Harm Described by the Former UN Chief

 

By Deandrea Hamilton

Turks and Caicos, June 9, 2026 – One week after former Premier Michael Misick, former Cabinet minister McAllister Hanchell and attorney Thomas “Chal” Misick began serving prison sentences in the Turks and Caicos Islands’ landmark corruption case, attention is turning to a significant distinction made by Justice Rajendra Narine during sentencing.

In imposing prison terms on May 29, the judge agreed that corruption is a serious offence capable of causing profound societal harm. Yet he also found that there was no evidence the three convicted men caused the sweeping consequences described in one of the world’s most famous condemnations of corruption.

The quotation came from former United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan, who famously wrote:

“Corruption is an insidious plague that has a wide range of corrosive effects on societies. It undermines democracy and the rule of law, leads to violations of human rights, distorts markets, erodes the quality of life and allows organized crime, terrorism and other threats to human security to flourish.”

Annan further observed:

“This evil phenomenon is found in all countries — big and small, rich and poor — but it is in the developing world that its effects are most destructive.”

Justice Narine acknowledged the quotation but drew an important distinction between the broad consequences of corruption described by Annan and the evidence presented during the trial.

“The court agrees that there is no evidence in this case that the offending parties actually caused or contributed to any of the harmful consequences described in the quotation,” Narine said.

The finding did not spare the defendants from prison.

The judge made clear that the offences remained serious enough to warrant immediate custodial sentences.

“This case was about an abuse of public trust for the sake of personal gain,” Narine stated.

“The conduct of the defendants caused a constitutional crisis and reputational harm to the territory.”

He added that the public interest demanded punishment and deterrence.

“The public interest requires that the sentence must reflect society’s abhorrence of the criminal conduct and the sentence should be such that like-minded potential offenders would be deterred from similar conduct.”

Narine also rejected suggestions that the absence of direct victims diminished the seriousness of the offences, noting that corruption often harms institutions and public confidence rather than identifiable individuals.

At the same time, the court accepted several mitigating factors advanced by the defence.

“The court is aware of the age, middle age of the offenders, that the immediate custodial sentences would have a traumatic effect on the families, understanding the emotional distress involved,” Narine said.

He also agreed that rehabilitation was not a major concern.

“The court agrees with the defence counsel that there is a low risk of reoffending and that the objective of rehabilitation is not a significant factor in this case.”

Those considerations, combined with the extraordinary delay in bringing the matter to conclusion and the defendants’ previous good character, contributed to substantial reductions from the starting points the judge initially considered.

Michael Misick ultimately received an effective sentence of four years and 26 days on three bribery convictions. Hanchell was sentenced to three years on two bribery counts, while Chal Misick received four years on four money laundering convictions.

The legal saga, however, is far from over.

All three men remain in custody while awaiting a June 17 hearing on applications for bail pending appeal. In addition, confiscation proceedings — which could determine what assets or funds may be recoverable by the Crown — are still to come.

For now, the court’s message appears clear: while the conduct warranted prison and public condemnation, Justice Narine was not prepared to conclude that the defendants’ actions produced the full range of societal devastation described in Annan’s warning about corruption.

Angle by Deandrea Hamilton. Built with ChatGPT (AI). Magnetic Media — CAPTURING LIFE.

Continue Reading

FIND US ON FACEBOOK

TRENDING