Connect with us

News

Press Release Chamber of Commerce

Published

on

#TurksandCaicos, September 15, 2017 – Providenciales

 

 

After the Disaster . . . What Should I Do Now?

Information to Help Small Business Owners Make Post-Disaster Business Decisions

By Daniel J. Alesch, James N. Holly, Elliott Mittler, and Robert Nagy

University of Wisconsin-Green Bay Center for Organizational Studies

Published by the Public Entity Risk Institute On the Web at: www.riskinstitute.org

Public Entity Risk Institute

The Public Entity Risk Institute’s mission is to serve public, private, and nonprofit organizations as a dynamic, forward thinking resource for the practical enhancement of risk management.  PERI pursues its mission by:

Facilitating the development and delivery of education and training on all aspects of risk management, particularly for public entities, small nonprofit organizations, and small businesses.

Serving as a resource center and clearinghouse for risk management, environmental liability management, and disaster management information.

Operating an innovative, forward-looking grant and research program in risk management, environmental liability management, and disaster management.

For complete information on PERI’s programs and information services, visit our Web site at www.riskinstitute.org.

To access a wealth of risk management intelligence, visit the Risk Management Resource Center, at www.eriskcenter.org, a collaborative Web site operated by PERI, the Public Risk Management Association (PRIMA), and the Nonprofit Risk Management Center (NRMC).

Public Entity Risk Institute

11350 Random Hills Road, Suite 210

Fairfax, VA 22030

Phone: (703) 352-1846

FAX: (703) 352-6339

Gerard J. Hoetmer

Executive Director

The Public Entity Risk Institute (PERI) provides these materials “as is,” for educational and informational purposes only, and without representation, guarantee or warranty of any kind, express or implied, including any warranty relating to the accuracy, reliability, completeness, currency or usefulness of the content of this material.   Publication and distribution of this material is not an endorsement by PERI, its officers, directors or employees of any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained herein.   PERI will not be liable for any claims for damages of any kind based upon errors, omissions or other inaccuracies in the information or material contained on these pages.   PERI is not engaged in rendering professional services of any kind, and the information in these materials should not be construed as professional advice. Users bear complete responsibility for any reliance on this material, and should contact a competent professional familiar with their particular factual situation if expert assistance is required.

Business Survival is not Assured by Reopening the Doors

During a PERI-funded research project, we worked with more than 120 small business owners and managers of not-for-profit organizations all across the country to understand what happens to them following various natural disasters.

We’ve talked with some a few months after the disaster, with some as many as seven years after the event, and, with still others, every year for five years after the disaster.

We’ve reached several important conclusions that should weigh heavily on any business owner’s decisions about what to do with his or her business in the aftermath of a major disaster:

First, we have concluded that disaster events cause problems for businesses unrelated to the amount of direct damage they sustain from the event and from related events, like fire following an earthquake.

Second, we found that, unless the business owner makes good decisions about recovery, the largest losses to the business come in the years after disaster and not from the direct damage of the disaster itself.

Third, we found that, following any large scale disaster in a community, things never get “back to normal.” The community almost always changes permanently, ______________________This article is a supplement to a research project report — Organizations at Risk: What Happens When Small Businesses and Not-for-Profits Encounter Natural Disasters — written by the same authors and published by the Public Entity Risk Institute (PERI).

The research project was supported with a grant from PERI.    The complete report is available at no charge on the PERI Web site, at www.riskinstitute.org. It is located in the Publications, Tools, Resources section of the site, in the list of Disaster Management materials.

Printed copies of Organizations at Risk, also available at no charge, can be requested through the Web site, or by contacting PERI at:

Public Entity Risk Institute

11350 Random Hills Rd., Suite 210

Fairfax, VA 22030

Phone: (703) 352-1846

Fax: (703) 352-6339

Creating a new business environment in which doing business the old way often results in operating at a loss for years and, then, when all equity in the business is used up, going out of business.

Finally, we found that it is possible, if an owner takes the right steps, to not only survive a major natural disaster, but to achieve real business viability in the postevent environment.

Among the factors that significantly contributed to business failures are:

  1. The effect the disaster event has on the customer base.
  2. The kinds of products or services the business provides.
  3. The business’ inability or unwillingness to respond appropriately to the new, post-event environment.
  4. The overall financial strength and stability of the business before the event.
  5. The owner’s inability or unwillingness to recognize the options available.

What to Expect in the Weeks and Months Following the Disaster

Your personal life will become stressful and uncertain following the event, even if you did not lose anyone close to you in the disaster.   You are likely to experience considerable ambiguity, particularly if both your home and your business were damaged.   For many business owners, stress will come simply from memories of the experience.   You, or members of your family, may experience difficultly sleeping soundly. Much of the stress will come because your primary source of income is gone, at least temporarily.   Some stress will be passed on to you from stressed employees.   There will be stress around insurance delays, questions about coverage, and settlements.   You may find yourself stressed about things you wish you had done, but there is little to gain in “I wish I woulda . . .” laments.   Finally, all the stress around the business and loss usually leads to increased stress at home.

In your business neighborhood, there will almost always be an underlying assumption on the part of business people, property owners, and public officials that “things will get back to normal soon,” but they will not.   We found that there is often social pressure from other business people in the damaged area to get back into business and to make things like they were before.

You will receive little information about rebuilding plans from the city or from owners and much of that information will be contradictory or wrong. State and local governments may be slow to respond with needed variances and recovery policies.

Many people who lived in the damaged area and either lost their homes or experienced other losses will move away, many of them permanently. Volunteers and others will be there to help clean up, but they, too, will disappear as the physical evidence of the disaster is trucked away.

Fundamental changes in the community will already have begun. Neighborhood trends that had started before the event are likely to speed up.   The neighborhood will change forever, even if the buildings are put back just the way they were before the event.   A new set of relationships, new neighbors, and new business patterns will develop.

The businesses that survive will be those whose owners and managers understand and adapt to the new business environment.

Options to Consider and Questions to Answer Before You Spend a Lot of Money to Reopen Your Business

Perhaps the most difficult factor for a business owner to deal with is recognizing the available options.   In our research, we found that many owners failed to see that they had alternatives available to them; in so doing, they severely limited themselves and their potential responses to the disaster. Too many business owners simply continued, after a disaster event, to do what they had done before the disaster event.   Their failure to consider the available options made it difficult to respond appropriately to the new, post-event environment.   Most of these businesses fell by the wayside.

However, a few entrepreneurs did consider the options available to them.   In doing so, they were able to devise or, in some cases, they just happened upon, recovery strategies that enabled them to avoid almost certain failure.   These strategies frequently led to profitable futures.

The suggestions included here for post-disaster business recovery are predicated on your willingness to consider the options available to you as a business owner and your desire to make informed business decisions.

We’ve put together, based on our research, a series of things to consider and questions to answer that will help you develop a sensible post-disaster strategy.   That strategy is intended to increase the probability that your firm can become financially viable in the post-event environment.

 

FIRST, REALLY UNDERSTAND YOUR BASIC OPTIONS

After a major disaster, almost every small business owner says, “Wow, that was quite a bump in the road.   Time to get back to business.”   And then he or she continues doing the same things in the same way, assuming things will get back to normal.

Following major disasters such as a strong earthquake, a major hurricane, widespread flooding, rioting and civil disruption, or a devastating terrorist attack, things change forever.   What that means is that your business environment is changed and that what worked well in the past may not work at all now, especially in your current location.

When a major disaster affects you, your financial survival depends on how well you make decisions in the new environment.   One of the very first things you should do is identify the basic options that are available to you.   It is not good enough to say, “Well, this business is what I do.   It is the only thing I know.”   You have to consider other things.

We think that, initially, you have at least three basic options available to you.

Option One – You can reopen your business.

Option Two – You can close your business.

Option three – You can (try to) sell or transfer the business to someone else.

Too often, in the stressful aftermath of disaster, a business owner chooses to reopen his or her business without considering or even knowing about the alternatives available, factors to consider, or the potential consequences of his or her actions.   Some additional information about how to pursue each option, which may influence your choice of options, is provided below.   This additional information should be studied before any decision is made.   (The advantages, disadvantages and other issues to consider when deciding whether or not to reopen your business after a disaster are discussed in the next section of this article.)

Option One – Reopen Your Business

  1. You can finance your business reopening with company assets, personal saving, low-interest loans, traditional loans, insurance proceeds, investment, family loans, credit cards, and so forth.
  2. You can reestablish your business at the same location or you can relocate your business. (Some loans and grants have conditions that prohibit relocation.)
  3. You can reopen your business offering the same products and services you provide before the disaster event or you can change, in part or entirely, the products and services you provide.

Option Two – Close Your Business

  1. You can walk away.
  2. You can liquidate the business
  3. You can start a new business with new product/services or the same product/service you previously provided.
  4. You can go to work for someone else.
  5. You can retire.

Option Three – You Can (Try To) Sell or Transfer the Business to Someone Else

  1. You can sell or transfer the business to your children. (If they are interested in running a business.)
  2. You can sell or transfer the business to a competitor.
  3. You can turn over the business to a relative or former employee.

These options are not singular or mutually exclusive.   For example, you may walk away from one business and start a new business, in a new location, that provides products and services, which may be the same or different from your previous business.

Very likely, you will be able to think of other options. The three basic options we’ve outlined are just for starters – something to get you thinking.

SECOND, ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS BEFORE DECIDING WHETHER TO REOPEN YOUR BUSINESS

What Happened and What Is Happening?

Make an effort to understand what happened and what is happening as a consequence of the event.   This is a difficult assignment because everything will be in flux, surrounded in ambiguity, and changing rapidly.   Information will be unreliable.   That means that one quick look around will not be enough.   The problem is that you need accurate, reliable information on which to make sensible decisions about your business in the post-disaster environment.   You will have to be engaged in a continuous effort to know what is going on in your neighborhood, your business community, and your local jurisdiction.

What Happened to Your Customers?

If you are in manufacturing or wholesaling, it is likely that your customer base is geographically dispersed.   Only a few of them may have suffered losses from the event.   In that case, it is important for you to do what is necessary to ensure that you meet your customers’ continuing needs.

If you suffered significant losses and will have to be closed for some time, it is important to learn what your customers are doing during the time it takes you to reopen.   If your customers did not suffer major losses, they may change their buying habits and you may have to fight an uphill battle to win them back.   Do your customers still want or need your product or service? Can they afford it?

Whether it makes sense to reopen your business depends mainly on what happened to your customers as a result of the event.    If all or most of your customers suffered large losses as a consequence of the disaster, there is little reason for you to reopen quickly, unless you have something they need desperately.   For example, it usually makes sense for lumberyards and building supply, pharmacies, physicians, furnishings and appliances, construction, dry cleaning and laundry, and grocery stores to reopen quickly.

However, if you sell goods and services that come from discretionary money, your customers may not be able to afford what you have to offer as they attempt to pick up the pieces.   We found that people who had big losses put off spending money at the optometrist, at specialty restaurants, for things like recreational gear, and for jewelry and expensive gifts.   Sometimes, your customers may move away. In that case, reopening is like starting over.

How Much Did You Lose and Where Will the Money Come From to Reopen?

If you suffered losses and were not insured, where will the money come from to reopen? Most business owners we talked with used their life savings, borrowed from relatives, used their credit cards, got a little help from suppliers and/or customers, or got loans through the Small Business Administration or from conventional lenders.   A few got loans or grants from local government. Do not expect any money from FEMA, the Red Cross, or other disaster assistance organizations – small businesses and small business owners usually are not eligible for that kind of assistance.

Before you decide to use your life savings or borrow money from organizations that require you to use your home and other personal assets as collateral, it makes sense to take a very serious look at your business prospects in the post-disaster environment.   There is a very good chance that your old business plan is no longer viable, depending on what happened to you and your customers.

We talked with dozens of small business owners who used all their savings to reopen a business that went nowhere in the post-disaster environment.   They lost their savings and the business.   Often, reopening after a major disaster is like starting a new business. Banks and the SBA will probably be willing to loan you money to reopen based on your experience before the disaster, but, before you make that commitment, make sure you have a solid business plan for the post-disaster environment.

Before you reopen, understand fully that things will never be the way they were before.   Last year’s business plan is dead as a dodo.   It is time to conduct a new feasibility analysis and to rebuild your pro forma and cash flow analysis before committing any cash to the new venture.   If you can reopen without putting any significant amount of money into the venture and you have good reason to expect your customers to be there, then go ahead.   But, unless you have a service or product that people need desperately, expect that your business will not be what it was before the event for a long time.

In any event, it makes sense to be cautious.   Be cautious about how you use your insurance proceeds; don’t confuse cash flow with investment.   Be wary of taking loans that require you to use personal assets, like your home, as collateral.   Be wary of taking loans that will be forgiven if you stay in the same business in the same location.   You may be far better off moving to a new location.

If you are at or near retirement age, you will want to think particularly carefully about reopening the business.   Many people we interviewed put their savings back into a business that did not survive the next five years.   You may be better off liquidating your business assets and putting your money in safer investments.   Sometimes, even if your alternatives look bleak, it still makes sense to walk away.

If you had insurance that covered most of your losses, you are in the minority of small business owners.   Many small firms will have experienced uninsured disaster related losses from damage to their plant or equipment, their inventory, and to the building they rent or own.   Many more lose money from uninsured business interruption in the chaotic period following the disaster.

How Strong Was Your Business Before the Event?

How Well Is Your Firm Positioned with Regard to the Dominant Trends in Your Industry?   Even if your organization was doing well before the disaster, it is important for you to take a hard look at where your firm is with regard to dominant trends in the area where you do business.   Retail patterns are, of course, changing.   Small town, downtown merchants are having a tough struggle against giant chain retailers located on the outskirts of town.   If your firm is positioned favorably with regard to industry trends, your chances of surviving a disaster are much better than if your firm is in an uphill fight against major trends.

Only you will know how strong your business was before the disaster.    If you were losing out to the competition before the disaster, there is no reason to believe you can do better after the disaster.   If your firm was doing well, growing and becoming more profitable each year, chances are you can do well after the disaster, provided you can retain your customers in the unsettled times after the event.

Are You Able to Give What It Is Going to Take?

It takes a lot of energy and commitment to start a new business.   You know that.   You’ve done it.   Remember that, following a real disaster, it usually takes that same level of commitment and energy to revitalize a business that has suffered a disastrous event.   Ask yourself whether you still have the drive needed to do it again.   If so, good luck with your venture.   If not, it makes a lot of sense to reconsider your options.

 

Continue Reading

Finance

TCI Financial Services Opens Debate on Cryptocurrency Rules 

Published

on

Turks and Caicos, May 12, 2026 – A new era of digital finance regulation could be on the horizon for the Turks and Caicos Islands, as the Financial Services Commission moves to establish a legal framework for virtual assets and cryptocurrency-related businesses.

The TCI Financial Services Commission on Friday launched a public consultation on its proposed Virtual Assets Business Bill, 2026, legislation designed to regulate virtual asset service providers, stablecoin issuers and other digital asset activities operating in or from the territory.

Globally, governments and regulators have been racing to catch up with the rapid growth of digital currencies, blockchain technology and online financial platforms. Concerns over money laundering, cybercrime, fraud and the collapse of poorly regulated crypto exchanges have pushed jurisdictions to tighten oversight while still trying to attract financial innovation and investment.

The proposed TCI bill appears aimed at positioning the territory within that evolving international framework.

According to the FSC, the legislation is aligned with international standards and guidance from bodies including the Financial Action Task Force, International Organization of Securities Commissions and the Financial Stability Board.

The Commission said the bill would introduce a “comprehensive licensing, supervisory, prudential and enforcement framework” for the sector. The proposed law includes anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing obligations, cyber resilience requirements, enforcement measures and even a regulatory sandbox intended to support innovation.

Among the notable features are proposed reserve and governance rules for stablecoins, which are digital currencies typically tied to traditional assets like the US dollar. The draft legislation also outlines exemptions for certain technology providers and closed-loop token systems.

The FSC said the consultation period is intended to gather public and industry feedback before the bill is submitted to Cabinet next month. Written submissions must be received by June 8, 2026.

The consultation paper and draft bill have been published on the FSC website for public review.

Angle by Deandrea Hamilton. Built with ChatGPT (AI). Magnetic Media — CAPTURING LIFE.

Continue Reading

News

Conch Farm Site to become New Home for Watersports Operators

Published

on

$12 million acquisition signals marina plan, not return of commercial conch farming

 

Turks and Caicos, May 12, 2026 – The Turks and Caicos Islands Government’s acquisition of the former Conch Farm property is not shaping up as a revival of the once world-famous aquaculture operation in Long Bay.

Instead, the $12 million purchase appears headed in a very different direction — transforming the sprawling waterfront site into what could become the new operational home for scores of marine and watersports operators who have long struggled for space along the eastern shores of Providenciales.

And for many observers familiar with the growing tensions in those areas, the move may actually make more sense than first believed.

Over the years, the rapid expansion of jet ski operators, charter boats, parasailing businesses and excursion companies along eastern beach and marina areas has increasingly created disputes over access, launching rights, docking space and territorial use of waterfront locations.

At times, those disagreements have reportedly escalated into confrontations serious enough to require police intervention.

Now, according to comments delivered by Premier and Finance Minister Charles Washington Misick during debate on the 2026/27 Budget, government intends to use the former Conch Farm property to bring greater order and infrastructure to the rapidly expanding marine sector.

“The acquisition and redevelopment of the Conch Farm property at Long Bay, Providenciales, is a strategic Government investment to strengthen the rapidly growing marine and water sports sector,” the Premier said.

He explained that the project is envisioned as:

“a safe, clean, and well-managed public marina dedicated to local operators.”

The Premier also pointed directly to the growing number of young Turks and Caicos Islanders entering the marine tourism industry since the COVID-19 pandemic.

“So many of these operators are young Turks and Caicos Islanders who have turned to self-employment since COVID-19,” he stated during the Budget presentation.

Government says the marina would provide affordable and regulated launching facilities while creating space for docking, boat services, small vendors, maintenance operations and other marine-related businesses.

The proposal also aims to formalize portions of an industry which has expanded rapidly alongside the country’s booming tourism economy.

“Best of all it ensures that the benefits of our booming tourism industry are retained right here in Turks and Caicos communities,” the Premier added.

The clarification significantly changes early public assumptions that government was preparing to revive the commercial conch farming operation once associated with the property.

The original Caicos Conch Farm was widely regarded as the world’s first and only commercial conch farm before hurricane damage, operational struggles, policy disputes and legal battles eventually led to its closure.

Now, while the historic name and marine legacy remain attached to the site, the government’s immediate vision appears centered far more on marine infrastructure and economic activity than on aquaculture.

And in a tourism economy increasingly dependent on marine excursions and water-based experiences, the move could ultimately reshape one of the most contentious and overcrowded corners of Providenciales’ tourism landscape.

Angle by Deandrea Hamilton. Built with ChatGPT (AI). Magnetic Media — CAPTURING LIFE.

Continue Reading

News

Anantara Targets North Caicos for Latest Luxury Development

Published

on

International resort brand launches sales for residences and resort project on Sandy Point

 

Turks and Caicos, May 12, 2026 – Sales have started on what could become another multi-million-dollar luxury residential resort development for the Turks and Caicos Islands — but this time, North Caicos is poised to become home to the investment by international luxury brand Anantara.

The project, now being marketed globally through developer platforms and international promotional campaigns, is planned for the Sandy Point coastline and is being pitched as a collection of luxury residences paired with high-end resort amenities on one of the country’s least developed major islands.

What may distinguish this proposal from several ambitious North Caicos projects that never fully materialized, however, is the reputation and global footprint behind the Anantara brand itself.

Anantara Hotels & Resorts operates luxury properties across Asia, the Middle East, Africa and Europe under parent company Minor Hotels, an international hospitality group with more than 500 hotels in operation worldwide. The North Caicos project is being promoted as Anantara’s first-ever Caribbean development — a detail likely to draw heightened international attention and investor confidence.

Developers are positioning the investment as an opportunity to experience a quieter, less discovered side of the Turks and Caicos Islands, one they argue rivals the beauty and exclusivity long associated with Providenciales.

And North Caicos, one of the largest islands in the archipelago and widely regarded as its most lush and green, offers a dramatically different landscape from the tourism-heavy pace of Providenciales — with expansive wetlands, undeveloped beaches, dense vegetation and a slower, nature-focused atmosphere increasingly attractive to luxury travelers seeking privacy and wellness-oriented experiences.

According to promotional material, the development is located approximately 25 minutes from Providenciales by combined ferry and air connections and will include 78 branded residences, beachfront villas and resort-style amenities focused on low-density luxury living.

The project team includes several recognized figures in luxury hospitality and development, among them Rob Ayer, associated with Wymara Resort developments, and Caroline Domange, co-founder of Cheval Blanc, the ultra-luxury hospitality brand linked to LVMH.

Premier Charles Washington Misick is also featured prominently in the global announcement, describing the project as:

“the beginning of a new chapter for luxury lifestyles in the Turks and Caicos Islands.”

The investment aligns closely with government’s increasing emphasis on shifting development beyond Providenciales and driving greater economic activity into the Family Islands.

Still, the proposal is also expected to reignite wider national discussions about infrastructure readiness, housing pressures and the long-term pace of development throughout the territory — particularly as government recently approved the formation of a Public Private Partnership Working Group on Hotel Employee Accommodations.

Promotional material circulating internationally suggests residences at the North Caicos development could start at just under US$1 million — underscoring the ultra-luxury market the project intends to attract.

The project is currently targeting a 2029 opening.

Angle by Deandrea Hamilton. Built with ChatGPT (AI). Magnetic Media — CAPTURING LIFE.

Continue Reading

FIND US ON FACEBOOK

TRENDING