Connect with us

News

Press Release Chamber of Commerce

Published

on

#TurksandCaicos, September 15, 2017 – Providenciales

 

 

After the Disaster . . . What Should I Do Now?

Information to Help Small Business Owners Make Post-Disaster Business Decisions

By Daniel J. Alesch, James N. Holly, Elliott Mittler, and Robert Nagy

University of Wisconsin-Green Bay Center for Organizational Studies

Published by the Public Entity Risk Institute On the Web at: www.riskinstitute.org

Public Entity Risk Institute

The Public Entity Risk Institute’s mission is to serve public, private, and nonprofit organizations as a dynamic, forward thinking resource for the practical enhancement of risk management.  PERI pursues its mission by:

Facilitating the development and delivery of education and training on all aspects of risk management, particularly for public entities, small nonprofit organizations, and small businesses.

Serving as a resource center and clearinghouse for risk management, environmental liability management, and disaster management information.

Operating an innovative, forward-looking grant and research program in risk management, environmental liability management, and disaster management.

For complete information on PERI’s programs and information services, visit our Web site at www.riskinstitute.org.

To access a wealth of risk management intelligence, visit the Risk Management Resource Center, at www.eriskcenter.org, a collaborative Web site operated by PERI, the Public Risk Management Association (PRIMA), and the Nonprofit Risk Management Center (NRMC).

Public Entity Risk Institute

11350 Random Hills Road, Suite 210

Fairfax, VA 22030

Phone: (703) 352-1846

FAX: (703) 352-6339

Gerard J. Hoetmer

Executive Director

The Public Entity Risk Institute (PERI) provides these materials “as is,” for educational and informational purposes only, and without representation, guarantee or warranty of any kind, express or implied, including any warranty relating to the accuracy, reliability, completeness, currency or usefulness of the content of this material.   Publication and distribution of this material is not an endorsement by PERI, its officers, directors or employees of any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained herein.   PERI will not be liable for any claims for damages of any kind based upon errors, omissions or other inaccuracies in the information or material contained on these pages.   PERI is not engaged in rendering professional services of any kind, and the information in these materials should not be construed as professional advice. Users bear complete responsibility for any reliance on this material, and should contact a competent professional familiar with their particular factual situation if expert assistance is required.

Business Survival is not Assured by Reopening the Doors

During a PERI-funded research project, we worked with more than 120 small business owners and managers of not-for-profit organizations all across the country to understand what happens to them following various natural disasters.

We’ve talked with some a few months after the disaster, with some as many as seven years after the event, and, with still others, every year for five years after the disaster.

We’ve reached several important conclusions that should weigh heavily on any business owner’s decisions about what to do with his or her business in the aftermath of a major disaster:

First, we have concluded that disaster events cause problems for businesses unrelated to the amount of direct damage they sustain from the event and from related events, like fire following an earthquake.

Second, we found that, unless the business owner makes good decisions about recovery, the largest losses to the business come in the years after disaster and not from the direct damage of the disaster itself.

Third, we found that, following any large scale disaster in a community, things never get “back to normal.” The community almost always changes permanently, ______________________This article is a supplement to a research project report — Organizations at Risk: What Happens When Small Businesses and Not-for-Profits Encounter Natural Disasters — written by the same authors and published by the Public Entity Risk Institute (PERI).

The research project was supported with a grant from PERI.    The complete report is available at no charge on the PERI Web site, at www.riskinstitute.org. It is located in the Publications, Tools, Resources section of the site, in the list of Disaster Management materials.

Printed copies of Organizations at Risk, also available at no charge, can be requested through the Web site, or by contacting PERI at:

Public Entity Risk Institute

11350 Random Hills Rd., Suite 210

Fairfax, VA 22030

Phone: (703) 352-1846

Fax: (703) 352-6339

Creating a new business environment in which doing business the old way often results in operating at a loss for years and, then, when all equity in the business is used up, going out of business.

Finally, we found that it is possible, if an owner takes the right steps, to not only survive a major natural disaster, but to achieve real business viability in the postevent environment.

Among the factors that significantly contributed to business failures are:

  1. The effect the disaster event has on the customer base.
  2. The kinds of products or services the business provides.
  3. The business’ inability or unwillingness to respond appropriately to the new, post-event environment.
  4. The overall financial strength and stability of the business before the event.
  5. The owner’s inability or unwillingness to recognize the options available.

What to Expect in the Weeks and Months Following the Disaster

Your personal life will become stressful and uncertain following the event, even if you did not lose anyone close to you in the disaster.   You are likely to experience considerable ambiguity, particularly if both your home and your business were damaged.   For many business owners, stress will come simply from memories of the experience.   You, or members of your family, may experience difficultly sleeping soundly. Much of the stress will come because your primary source of income is gone, at least temporarily.   Some stress will be passed on to you from stressed employees.   There will be stress around insurance delays, questions about coverage, and settlements.   You may find yourself stressed about things you wish you had done, but there is little to gain in “I wish I woulda . . .” laments.   Finally, all the stress around the business and loss usually leads to increased stress at home.

In your business neighborhood, there will almost always be an underlying assumption on the part of business people, property owners, and public officials that “things will get back to normal soon,” but they will not.   We found that there is often social pressure from other business people in the damaged area to get back into business and to make things like they were before.

You will receive little information about rebuilding plans from the city or from owners and much of that information will be contradictory or wrong. State and local governments may be slow to respond with needed variances and recovery policies.

Many people who lived in the damaged area and either lost their homes or experienced other losses will move away, many of them permanently. Volunteers and others will be there to help clean up, but they, too, will disappear as the physical evidence of the disaster is trucked away.

Fundamental changes in the community will already have begun. Neighborhood trends that had started before the event are likely to speed up.   The neighborhood will change forever, even if the buildings are put back just the way they were before the event.   A new set of relationships, new neighbors, and new business patterns will develop.

The businesses that survive will be those whose owners and managers understand and adapt to the new business environment.

Options to Consider and Questions to Answer Before You Spend a Lot of Money to Reopen Your Business

Perhaps the most difficult factor for a business owner to deal with is recognizing the available options.   In our research, we found that many owners failed to see that they had alternatives available to them; in so doing, they severely limited themselves and their potential responses to the disaster. Too many business owners simply continued, after a disaster event, to do what they had done before the disaster event.   Their failure to consider the available options made it difficult to respond appropriately to the new, post-event environment.   Most of these businesses fell by the wayside.

However, a few entrepreneurs did consider the options available to them.   In doing so, they were able to devise or, in some cases, they just happened upon, recovery strategies that enabled them to avoid almost certain failure.   These strategies frequently led to profitable futures.

The suggestions included here for post-disaster business recovery are predicated on your willingness to consider the options available to you as a business owner and your desire to make informed business decisions.

We’ve put together, based on our research, a series of things to consider and questions to answer that will help you develop a sensible post-disaster strategy.   That strategy is intended to increase the probability that your firm can become financially viable in the post-event environment.

 

FIRST, REALLY UNDERSTAND YOUR BASIC OPTIONS

After a major disaster, almost every small business owner says, “Wow, that was quite a bump in the road.   Time to get back to business.”   And then he or she continues doing the same things in the same way, assuming things will get back to normal.

Following major disasters such as a strong earthquake, a major hurricane, widespread flooding, rioting and civil disruption, or a devastating terrorist attack, things change forever.   What that means is that your business environment is changed and that what worked well in the past may not work at all now, especially in your current location.

When a major disaster affects you, your financial survival depends on how well you make decisions in the new environment.   One of the very first things you should do is identify the basic options that are available to you.   It is not good enough to say, “Well, this business is what I do.   It is the only thing I know.”   You have to consider other things.

We think that, initially, you have at least three basic options available to you.

Option One – You can reopen your business.

Option Two – You can close your business.

Option three – You can (try to) sell or transfer the business to someone else.

Too often, in the stressful aftermath of disaster, a business owner chooses to reopen his or her business without considering or even knowing about the alternatives available, factors to consider, or the potential consequences of his or her actions.   Some additional information about how to pursue each option, which may influence your choice of options, is provided below.   This additional information should be studied before any decision is made.   (The advantages, disadvantages and other issues to consider when deciding whether or not to reopen your business after a disaster are discussed in the next section of this article.)

Option One – Reopen Your Business

  1. You can finance your business reopening with company assets, personal saving, low-interest loans, traditional loans, insurance proceeds, investment, family loans, credit cards, and so forth.
  2. You can reestablish your business at the same location or you can relocate your business. (Some loans and grants have conditions that prohibit relocation.)
  3. You can reopen your business offering the same products and services you provide before the disaster event or you can change, in part or entirely, the products and services you provide.

Option Two – Close Your Business

  1. You can walk away.
  2. You can liquidate the business
  3. You can start a new business with new product/services or the same product/service you previously provided.
  4. You can go to work for someone else.
  5. You can retire.

Option Three – You Can (Try To) Sell or Transfer the Business to Someone Else

  1. You can sell or transfer the business to your children. (If they are interested in running a business.)
  2. You can sell or transfer the business to a competitor.
  3. You can turn over the business to a relative or former employee.

These options are not singular or mutually exclusive.   For example, you may walk away from one business and start a new business, in a new location, that provides products and services, which may be the same or different from your previous business.

Very likely, you will be able to think of other options. The three basic options we’ve outlined are just for starters – something to get you thinking.

SECOND, ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS BEFORE DECIDING WHETHER TO REOPEN YOUR BUSINESS

What Happened and What Is Happening?

Make an effort to understand what happened and what is happening as a consequence of the event.   This is a difficult assignment because everything will be in flux, surrounded in ambiguity, and changing rapidly.   Information will be unreliable.   That means that one quick look around will not be enough.   The problem is that you need accurate, reliable information on which to make sensible decisions about your business in the post-disaster environment.   You will have to be engaged in a continuous effort to know what is going on in your neighborhood, your business community, and your local jurisdiction.

What Happened to Your Customers?

If you are in manufacturing or wholesaling, it is likely that your customer base is geographically dispersed.   Only a few of them may have suffered losses from the event.   In that case, it is important for you to do what is necessary to ensure that you meet your customers’ continuing needs.

If you suffered significant losses and will have to be closed for some time, it is important to learn what your customers are doing during the time it takes you to reopen.   If your customers did not suffer major losses, they may change their buying habits and you may have to fight an uphill battle to win them back.   Do your customers still want or need your product or service? Can they afford it?

Whether it makes sense to reopen your business depends mainly on what happened to your customers as a result of the event.    If all or most of your customers suffered large losses as a consequence of the disaster, there is little reason for you to reopen quickly, unless you have something they need desperately.   For example, it usually makes sense for lumberyards and building supply, pharmacies, physicians, furnishings and appliances, construction, dry cleaning and laundry, and grocery stores to reopen quickly.

However, if you sell goods and services that come from discretionary money, your customers may not be able to afford what you have to offer as they attempt to pick up the pieces.   We found that people who had big losses put off spending money at the optometrist, at specialty restaurants, for things like recreational gear, and for jewelry and expensive gifts.   Sometimes, your customers may move away. In that case, reopening is like starting over.

How Much Did You Lose and Where Will the Money Come From to Reopen?

If you suffered losses and were not insured, where will the money come from to reopen? Most business owners we talked with used their life savings, borrowed from relatives, used their credit cards, got a little help from suppliers and/or customers, or got loans through the Small Business Administration or from conventional lenders.   A few got loans or grants from local government. Do not expect any money from FEMA, the Red Cross, or other disaster assistance organizations – small businesses and small business owners usually are not eligible for that kind of assistance.

Before you decide to use your life savings or borrow money from organizations that require you to use your home and other personal assets as collateral, it makes sense to take a very serious look at your business prospects in the post-disaster environment.   There is a very good chance that your old business plan is no longer viable, depending on what happened to you and your customers.

We talked with dozens of small business owners who used all their savings to reopen a business that went nowhere in the post-disaster environment.   They lost their savings and the business.   Often, reopening after a major disaster is like starting a new business. Banks and the SBA will probably be willing to loan you money to reopen based on your experience before the disaster, but, before you make that commitment, make sure you have a solid business plan for the post-disaster environment.

Before you reopen, understand fully that things will never be the way they were before.   Last year’s business plan is dead as a dodo.   It is time to conduct a new feasibility analysis and to rebuild your pro forma and cash flow analysis before committing any cash to the new venture.   If you can reopen without putting any significant amount of money into the venture and you have good reason to expect your customers to be there, then go ahead.   But, unless you have a service or product that people need desperately, expect that your business will not be what it was before the event for a long time.

In any event, it makes sense to be cautious.   Be cautious about how you use your insurance proceeds; don’t confuse cash flow with investment.   Be wary of taking loans that require you to use personal assets, like your home, as collateral.   Be wary of taking loans that will be forgiven if you stay in the same business in the same location.   You may be far better off moving to a new location.

If you are at or near retirement age, you will want to think particularly carefully about reopening the business.   Many people we interviewed put their savings back into a business that did not survive the next five years.   You may be better off liquidating your business assets and putting your money in safer investments.   Sometimes, even if your alternatives look bleak, it still makes sense to walk away.

If you had insurance that covered most of your losses, you are in the minority of small business owners.   Many small firms will have experienced uninsured disaster related losses from damage to their plant or equipment, their inventory, and to the building they rent or own.   Many more lose money from uninsured business interruption in the chaotic period following the disaster.

How Strong Was Your Business Before the Event?

How Well Is Your Firm Positioned with Regard to the Dominant Trends in Your Industry?   Even if your organization was doing well before the disaster, it is important for you to take a hard look at where your firm is with regard to dominant trends in the area where you do business.   Retail patterns are, of course, changing.   Small town, downtown merchants are having a tough struggle against giant chain retailers located on the outskirts of town.   If your firm is positioned favorably with regard to industry trends, your chances of surviving a disaster are much better than if your firm is in an uphill fight against major trends.

Only you will know how strong your business was before the disaster.    If you were losing out to the competition before the disaster, there is no reason to believe you can do better after the disaster.   If your firm was doing well, growing and becoming more profitable each year, chances are you can do well after the disaster, provided you can retain your customers in the unsettled times after the event.

Are You Able to Give What It Is Going to Take?

It takes a lot of energy and commitment to start a new business.   You know that.   You’ve done it.   Remember that, following a real disaster, it usually takes that same level of commitment and energy to revitalize a business that has suffered a disastrous event.   Ask yourself whether you still have the drive needed to do it again.   If so, good luck with your venture.   If not, it makes a lot of sense to reconsider your options.

 

Continue Reading

Independent writer

Fifty Years of Ministerial Government: Honouring Our Past, Embracing Our Present and Preparing for Our Destiny

Published

on

An Editorial by Dr. Alicia Swann

In the days following our most recent national celebration, I have observed conversations filled with strong opinions and emotions. Some have expressed pride and gratitude, while others have questioned our flag, Constitution, identity, political system and future.

After listening, I feel compelled to share my thoughts—not to dismiss anyone’s feelings or deepen division, but to offer historical clarity and, most importantly, hope.

The concerns of Turks and Caicos Islanders are valid. Many are worried about the protection of our land and identity, opportunities for our children and whether our people will continue to have a meaningful place in the country our ancestors built. These concerns deserve honest discussion, factual information, prayerful reflection and responsible planning.

However, as the Turks and Caicos Islands commemorates fifty years of Ministerial Government and celebrates National Flag Day, we must remember that this occasion is not about the current administration, one political party or any individual leader.

Governments come and go, but the story of a people remains.

This celebration belongs to our ancestors—the true visionaries, pioneers and nation-builders who paved the way for us. It belongs to the salt rakers who laboured beneath the blazing sun, the fishermen who braved dangerous seas, the farmers, teachers, mothers, pastors and citizens who built communities and demanded a voice in their homeland.

Many never lived to enjoy the progress their sacrifices helped to create. Yet because they endured, we inherited a country filled with possibilities.

A Political Journey That Began Long Before 1976

Long before European colonisation, these islands were inhabited by the Lucayan-Taíno people. Following European arrival, Indigenous communities suffered enslavement, forced removal and disease.

From the seventeenth century, Bermudian salt rakers developed our natural salt ponds. Enslaved Africans provided much of the labour sustaining the salt and plantation economies, and their descendants became central to the formation of the Turks and Caicos Islander people.

Britain’s influence developed through colonial expansion and competition with Spain and France. At different stages, the islands were administered through The Bahamas and Jamaica.

Dissatisfaction with decisions made under Bahamian administration contributed to our separation from The Bahamas in 1848 and the establishment of a local Legislative Board. In 1873, TCI became a dependency of the British colony of Jamaica. Local elections were abolished and were not restored until the 1959 Constitution—approximately eighty-six years later.

When Jamaica gained independence in 1962, TCI remained under Britain. From 1965 until Bahamian independence in 1973, the Governor of The Bahamas also served as Governor of TCI. We then received our own resident Governor and continued our constitutional journey.

Haiti never governed the Turks and Caicos Islands, but it holds an important place in our regional history. Following its independence in 1804, Haiti became a powerful symbol of freedom from slavery. Historical records indicate that enslaved people escaped from these islands to freedom in Haiti during the 1820s. In later generations, Haitians, Jamaicans, Bahamians and other Caribbean people contributed to our churches, public service, construction, education, hospitality and economy.

Our history is connected to the wider Caribbean, but our identity remains distinctly Turks and Caicos Islander.

The Significance of 1976

The 1976 Constitution provided for a Chief Minister and other Ministers with responsibility for important areas of government. The Honourable James Alexander George Smith “JAGS” McCartney became our first Chief Minister.

JAGS represented more than a political party. He represented a national awakening—the belief that Turks and Caicos Islanders deserved dignity, representation and a meaningful voice in the management of their homeland.

Ministerial Government was not the achievement of one person alone. It was made possible by generations of representatives, civil servants, community organisers, clergy, educators, workers and citizens who believed our people were capable of shaping their destiny.

The fifty years that followed were not without difficulty. We experienced controversy, constitutional change and interruptions to elected government. Yet representative government returned, our institutions developed and our people continued moving forward.

This anniversary does not suggest that everything has been perfect. It demonstrates that our democracy and our people have endured.

Never Forget Our Resilience

Our ancestors survived slavery, colonial administration, poverty, migration, isolation, political interruption and devastating hurricanes. From an economy once dependent upon salt, sisal and fishing, we built one of the world’s most recognised tourism destinations.

Generations of Turks and Caicos Islanders travelled to neighbouring countries seeking opportunities unavailable at home. Some were not always welcomed or treated as equals. Today, people from many of those same countries come to our shores hoping to work, live and create better futures.

This should not inspire hatred or prejudice. Those who come lawfully and contribute positively deserve dignity and respect. However, it should remind us how far we have come and why we must never surrender our identity or rightful place within our country.

Hospitality and patriotism are not opposites. We can welcome others without losing ourselves.

Scripture reminds us:

“But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith.”
—1 Timothy 5:8

Caring for our own does not mean mistreating others. It means ensuring that Turks and Caicos Islanders are educated, protected and empowered to participate meaningfully in the development of their homeland.

Government has an important responsibility, but nation-building requires more than government. Parents must teach our values, businesses must create opportunities, citizens must respect the law and young people must prepare themselves to lead.

Pride in Where We Are

Until such time as we become an independent and sovereign nation, we must thank God for where we are today.

There is nothing wrong with celebrating our constitutional progress, embracing our present flag or respecting our existing institutions. Doing so does not prevent us from desiring further advancement.

We cannot know where we are going unless we understand where we are now and how we arrived here. Our present flag represents our identity, history and constitutional relationship with Britain. It should be treated with dignity and respect.

Embracing the present is not abandoning the future; it is the pathway towards building it. We celebrate not because the journey is complete, but because God has brought us a mighty long way.

Passports, Citizenship and Our Future

Today, we remain a British Overseas Territory. Although the passport associated with our territory may identify the Turks and Caicos Islands, it is not a sovereign TCI passport issued under the authority of an independent Turks and Caicos nation. It exists within the British nationality system and derives its legal authority from the United Kingdom.

British Overseas Territories citizenship, British citizenship and Turks and Caicos Islander status are connected but legally distinct. None presently represents citizenship issued by a sovereign TCI nation.

This should not cause us to disrespect the passport or constitutional position we hold. Instead, it should encourage us to think responsibly about our future.

If we envision sovereignty, we must eventually determine who would become a citizen of an independent TCI, whether dual citizenship would be permitted and what rights and responsibilities citizenship would carry. We must also consider how to protect our limited land, create pathways to ownership and help Islanders build generational wealth.

Our immigration system must welcome lawful contribution and respect human dignity while protecting the country’s long-term interests and enforcing its laws fairly.

These complex questions must not be decided through hostility, secrecy, political favour or temporary emotion. They require public education, research and consultation involving every inhabited island, our diaspora, elders, young people, churches, businesses, experts, Parliament, relevant institutions and the United Kingdom Government.

After proper preparation and national consultation, the people—not merely a government—should ultimately determine our political future through a clear and credible referendum.

Preparing for Our Destiny

I envision a future in which the Turks and Caicos Islands advances beyond its present constitutional position, governs its own destiny and may one day raise the sovereign flag of an independent nation.

Is it possible? Yes.

Would it require sacrifice, disciplined planning and strong institutions? Absolutely.

Would it require God-fearing leaders with integrity who place the country above personal and political interests? Without question.

“When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn.”
—Proverbs 29:2

Independence without integrity would merely replace one form of dependency with another. Sovereignty must be supported by ethical leadership, economic stability, an independent judiciary, effective border protection, disaster preparedness and an educated population.

Preparation does not mean declaring independence tomorrow. It means beginning the research, civic education, institution-building and national consultation today.

“Write the vision, and make it plain upon tables, that he may run that readeth it.”
—Habakkuk 2:2

Preparing the Next Generation

We must ensure that our children know the history of the Turks and Caicos Islands and understand the sacrifices that paved the way for them.

A generation that does not know its history may inherit a country without understanding its value.

Our history must be taught in our homes, schools, churches and communities. Our children should never have to depend entirely upon outsiders to explain who they are or where they came from.

We must also stop gatekeeping knowledge. Whatever wisdom, education, experience or influence God has given us was not given for our benefit alone. It was entrusted to us so that we may mentor and guide those coming behind us.

True leadership does not conceal knowledge to protect a position. It shares knowledge to prepare a successor.

Let us give our children more than possessions. Let us give them identity, history, wisdom, confidence and a country they are prepared to protect and lead.

We Have What It Takes

We are a small country, but smallness does not mean incapability. Our ancestors created communities with almost nothing and survived circumstances far more difficult than those we face today.

We can honour our present flag without surrendering our future. We can welcome others without losing ourselves. We can celebrate how far we have come while preparing responsibly for where we wish to go.

This is the true meaning of the anniversary: a celebration of our ancestors, constitutional progress, national resilience and continuing right to determine our destiny.

Our ancestors paved the way. We must now possess the courage, discipline, unity and faith to continue the journey.

Dr. Alicia Swann
Proud Turks and Caicos Islander, Civic Leader and Advocate

Continue Reading

Education

Department of Education Concludes Four-Day TCI National Standards Secondary School Curriculum Implementation Training

Published

on

Providenciales, Turks and Caicos Islands: The Department of Education, through its Curriculum Development Unit, successfully concluded a four-day TCI National Standards Secondary School Curriculum Implementation Training, bringing together secondary school teachers, curriculum officers, education officials, facilitators and key stakeholders in preparation for the piloting of the Turks and Caicos Islands’ draft national secondary curricula.

The training focused on Social Studies, Mathematics, English Language and General Science. Teachers explored the draft curricula, learning objectives, content, instructional approaches and assessment expectations, while considering how the standards can be translated into meaningful classroom practice. The curricula are grounded in research, educational data, national priorities, comparative curriculum analysis and the distinctive context of the Turks and Caicos Islands.

The Honourable Rachel Taylor, Minister of Education, Youth, Sports and Culture, commended Mrs Cleon Astwood, Head of the Curriculum Development Unit, and her team for their dedication and the significant progress made in developing the National Standards Curricula for secondary education. She also recognised the invaluable contribution of educators across the Turks and Caicos Islands, whose professional expertise, classroom experience, and feedback are essential to ensuring that the curricula are relevant, responsive, and aligned with the evolving needs of TCI learners.

“The development of our National Standards Curricula is an important investment in the future of our children and, ultimately, in the future of the Turks and Caicos Islands. Education must continue to evolve to meet the changing needs of our learners, our society, and our economy. Our teachers are at the heart of this process. Their knowledge, professional experience, and insight from the classroom are critical to ensuring that the curricula we develop are academically sound, relevant to our local context, and practical to implement. I commend our Curriculum Development Unit and our educators for the tremendous work being undertaken and for their continued commitment to strengthening the quality of education we provide to every child in the Turks and Caicos Islands.”

Educators were also addressed by Mr James Astwood, Permanent Secretary; Mr Mark Garland, Director of Education; and Ms Elisann Delancy, Deputy Director of Education, who emphasised embracing change, professional collaboration and continuous improvement.

A central focus of the training was the role teachers will play during the pilot phase. Teachers were encouraged to critically engage with the draft documents, paying attention to the clarity and appropriateness of objectives, sequencing and progression, instructional time, resources, gaps, omissions and areas requiring clarification or revision. Their classroom experiences and documented feedback will help strengthen the curricula before finalisation and national implementation.

The Social Studies session also emphasised Local Studies. A panel featuring Mrs Lisa Talbot of the Turks and Caicos National Museum, Dr Carlton Mills, Mrs Joan Astwood-Sutton and Ms Cynclair Musgrove provided historical and cultural perspectives to support accurate, culturally relevant classroom instruction.

Mrs Cleon Astwood noted: “Curriculum development cannot take place in isolation from the teachers who will ultimately bring these documents to life. As they pilot these documents, we expect them to question, test, reflect and provide meaningful feedback. Constructive professional dialogue is necessary if we are to produce strong, relevant curricula that genuinely meet the needs of our students and our education system.”

With the training concluded, participating teachers will now implement and evaluate the draft curricula in authentic classroom settings, document strengths and challenges, and submit recommendations to the Curriculum Development Unit. The Department of Education extends its appreciation to all teachers, school leaders, facilitators, historians, stakeholders and Ministry and Department officials who contributed to the successful four-day exercise.

Continue Reading

News

UNDER 40 DAYS: COMMITTEE FORMED—BUT WHO IS ON IT?

Published

on

Turks and Caicos, September 11, 2026 – Fewer than 40 days may remain before InterHealth Canada’s reported 90-day handover period expires, yet the Turks and Caicos Islands Government has not publicly identified those steering the hospitals through the transition—or disclosed their mandate, deadlines and work programme.

The September 8 Speech from the Throne offered confirmation that a body exists: “A Joint Transition Committee of Government and Inter-Health has been formed to manage the handover.”

Government acknowledged the gravity of what comes next, declaring: “The immediate duty is clear. Clinical care and facilities services must continue without interruption while successor arrangements are put in place.”

It went further, promising: “Staffing, essential works, critical supplies and interim funding will be handled so that patients are protected during the transition from one contract to the next.”

Opposition Leader Douglas Parnell said the committee was expected to include six representatives from TCIG and six from InterHealth Canada. He claimed the names had been identified, but that the committee had not held its first meeting and no transition agreement had been executed. Parnell demanded publication of its membership, appointments, first meeting date and work programme.

Those claims have not been independently confirmed, but the Throne Speech did not answer them. It declared the committee formed without naming its chair or members, explaining its authority, confirming whether it has met, or setting measurable deadlines.

The distinction is critical. The hospitals are national assets; what is in question is who will deliver and manage the clinical and facilities services now contracted through InterHealth Canada when the arrangement ends.

Health Minister Kyle Knowles has insisted patient care will continue, saying: “We are working diligently to bring closure to this matter,” and maintaining that government can manage the process.

The Throne Speech itself framed the stakes plainly: “The people must be able to reach a hospital they can trust, at a price the country can sustain.”

Government also announced that “A Health Services Authority will be established to oversee primary, secondary and some tertiary level care,” but that authority is still to be established. The longer-term vision, according to the Speech, is “improved local capacity, prevention, transparent provider arrangements, responsible financial control and a workforce equal to the task.”

With the reported October 18 deadline approaching, assurances are no longer enough. The public needs to know who is managing the transition, what they must deliver, when each safeguard must be completed and what contingency exists if a successor arrangement is not ready.

A committee cannot inspire confidence while its composition and work remain invisible.

Continue Reading

FIND US ON FACEBOOK

TRENDING