Connect with us

News

A Heartless Government

Published

on

Turks and Caicos, August 15, 2024 – The recent demolition of a Senior Citizen’s home in Five Cays by Washy’s 14-1 PNP Government is a shocking and heartless act that cannot be overlooked. The demolished house belonged to Ms. Myrtle Gardiner, an elderly woman whose original home had already been destroyed by fire. This action by the PNP Government is not only cruel but also demonstrates a blatant disregard for the welfare of our vulnerable citizens.

Ms. Myrtle, already suffering from the trauma of losing her home to a fire, has now faced further distress as the 14-1 PNP Government has torn down her new place of refuge that was undergoing redevelopment.

It is deeply concerning that those tasked with protecting and serving our community have instead chosen to subject one of our most vulnerable members to such harsh treatment. Ms. Myrtle has been an upstanding member of the Five Cays community for decades.

As a community, we must stand together and voice our outrage at this inhumane act. The authorities must be held accountable for their actions, and immediate steps must be taken to provide the necessary support and compensation to Ms. Myrtle.

At the end of the day, if this government is not willing to help someone like her, then who are they willing to help?

I demand the following from the 14-1 PNP Government:

  1. An immediate investigation into the circumstances leading to the demolition of Ms. Myrtle’s home, with transparency and accountability at every step. Particularly, why was Ms. Myrtle’s home the target of the demolition exercise instead of the thousands of shacks occupied by illegal immigrants? Is it because Ms. Myrtle lives near the Five Cays beach and some investor wants her land? Was Ms. Myrtle’s house demolished as a part of a political gimmick as failed election promises of addressing illegal squatting were ignored for almost four years? Was Ms. Myrtle targeted because the 14-1 PNP Government felt that at 79 years old, no one would represent her rights? I want answers because this deplorable act will not get lost in the news cycle.
  2. Immediate provision of alternative housing for Ms. Myrtle must be made available, ensuring she has a safe and secure place to live until this PNP Government rebuilds her home on the same land she has lived on for decades. The role of a government should not be to make our most vulnerable citizens homeless.
  3. Comprehensive support and compensation for the emotional and physical trauma inflicted upon Ms. Myrtle by this callous act. Ms. Myrtle, still dealing with the trauma of losing family photos and heirlooms from her house fire, is now left wondering why this PNP Government decided to destroy all she has acquired since. This is just shameful.
  4. The Government must immediately implement policies to protect the homes and rights of vulnerable citizens, ensuring such incidents do not occur in the future. This is one of the reasons I created the Housing Department when I was a Minister. Almost four years after the PDM was not returned to office, there has been very little progress, if any, by this department. Either this is poor leadership by this PNP Government or just a lack of will to address the housing crisis. Imagine not one new house has been built by this government in almost four years.

The well-being of our senior citizens must be a priority. As a society, we are judged by how we treat our most vulnerable members.

This demolition is a stark reminder that we have much work to do to ensure fairness, justice, and compassion for all. I call on all residents of the Turks and Caicos Islands to join me in condemning this reprehensible act and advocate for the rights and dignity of our senior citizens. Together, we can create a community where everyone, regardless of age or circumstance, is treated with the respect and care they deserve.

The Informal Settlement Unit falls under the direct responsibility of the Deputy Premier Hon. Jamel Robinson. Therefore, he along with Premier Hon. Washington Misick and the outgoing MP for Five Cays Hon. Rachel Taylor must be held to account for this heinous act.

Time ain’t long now, and the people cannot wait to show y’all.

It’s time for TCIs!

 

Sean Astwood

PDM All Island Candidate

Continue Reading

Bahamas News

Mother’s Pride Headlines Bahamian Takeover at Sixers-Heat Clash in Miami

Published

on

The Bahamas, March 30, 2026 – The voice of a proud mother captured the spirit of a nation Monday night, as Bendra Rolle shared heartfelt reflections on the overwhelming Bahamian support for her son, VJ Edgecombe, during the Philadelphia 76ers matchup against the Miami Heat in Miami.

“The patriotic support and scenery at my son, VJ Edgecombe’s NBA game… was overwhelming,” Rolle said in a statement issued following the game. “The arena in Miami was lit. Bimini and the Bahamas showed up and showed out.”

Her words come amid what has already been widely described as a remarkable showing of national pride, with Bahamians traveling in large numbers to South Florida to witness the young guard’s continued rise. For Rolle, however, the moment extended far beyond basketball.

“Beyond VJ’s basketball talents, I’m so moved by his magnetic personality and personal journey to inspire and excite an entire nation—our beloved Bahamas,” she said. “I thank God for VJ’s humility and for his hunger for greatness. He never forgets how far God has brought us.”

While the Sixers did not secure the win on the night, Edgecombe delivered a solid individual performance, finishing with 13 points and five assists. He made an early impact on the game, showing confidence and poise before foul trouble disrupted his rhythm, but still managed to leave his mark in meaningful minutes.

The game itself evolved into a cultural showcase, with Bahamian flags waving throughout the arena and chants ringing out in support of Edgecombe. Much of that presence was bolstered by a coordinated travel push from Bahamasair, which helped facilitate fan travel and added to the electric atmosphere in Miami.

Rolle said the emotional weight of the moment was deeply felt by her family, as they witnessed firsthand the unity and pride of the Bahamian people.

“Thanks and love for the tears and overwhelming joy on Monday, Bahamas,” she expressed. “The Bahamian flags were love, loud, and proud. On my own behalf, VJ, and the entire family, I am ever grateful for the indescribable experience.”

Her closing words underscored what many have described as the true victory of the night—not the final score, but the powerful display of national pride and support surrounding one of The Bahamas’ rising stars.

Continue Reading

News

50 Years of Ministerial Government: Cabinet Moves to Mark Milestone Rooted in 1976 Constitution

Published

on

Turks and Caicos, March 30, 2026 – The Turks and Caicos Islands is preparing to mark a major political milestone, with Cabinet approving the establishment of a National Commemorative Committee to celebrate 50 years of ministerial government, a system first introduced under the 1976 Constitution.

The decision, confirmed in the February 10 Post Cabinet statement, signals a year of reflection on a governance model that fundamentally reshaped how the country is run — shifting from direct colonial administration toward locally led political leadership.

That shift was formalized in the Turks and Caicos Islands Constitution Order 1976, which laid the legal foundation for ministerial government and introduced a structured Executive and Legislative system.

At its core, the 1976 Constitution established an Executive Council, bringing together:

  • a Governor,
  • a Chief Minister elected by members of the Legislative Council,
  • and Ministers appointed to assist in governing the Islands.

A Very Different Government Back Then

If today’s Cabinet feels crowded, the 1976 version would have seemed almost unbelievable. There were just three Ministers serving alongside the Chief Minister — a tight, compact leadership team responsible for the affairs of an entire country. No sprawling list of ministries, no long roster of portfolios — just a handful of individuals carrying the weight of governance.

Becoming a Minister wasn’t a direct vote of the people either. You first had to win a seat in the Legislative Council, and from there, the Chief Minister would recommend who should serve. The Governor then made the appointments. In other words, political trust and alignment mattered just as much as public support — and ultimate authority still rested above the local leadership.

And as for job security? There wasn’t much of it. Ministers served without fixed terms and could be removed if they lost their seat, resigned, or if the Governor revoked their appointment. Even the Chief Minister could be ousted through a vote of no confidence. Add to that the basic requirements — being at least 21, a British subject, and meeting residency rules — and it’s clear that ministerial government in 1976 was not only smaller, but far more tightly controlled.

This marked the first time elected representatives were formally given defined roles in the administration of national affairs.

Under the Constitution, the Governor retained overarching authority, but was required in many instances to act on the advice of the Executive Council, particularly in shaping policy and overseeing government operations.

The Chief Minister, meanwhile, was positioned as the central political leader, responsible for directing government business and advising on the appointment of Ministers.

Importantly, the Constitution also allowed for the assignment of responsibilities to Ministers, giving them oversight of specific areas of government — a structure that remains at the heart of today’s Cabinet system.

Section 13 of the Order made clear that Ministers could be assigned responsibility for the administration of departments or government business, embedding accountability and functional governance into the system.

The Legislative Council, established alongside the Executive, provided the law-making body, with elected and appointed members participating in debates, passing legislation, and representing the interests of the Islands.

Together, these provisions created the framework for what is now recognized as ministerial government — a hybrid system balancing local political leadership with constitutional oversight by the Governor.

The explanatory note of the 1976 Order describes it as introducing “new provisions for the Government of the Turks and Caicos Islands,” including the creation of a Legislative Council with elected members and Ministers appointed on the advice of the Chief Minister.

Fifty years on, that structure has evolved through subsequent constitutional changes, but its foundation remains rooted in the 1976 framework.

Cabinet’s decision to establish a commemorative committee suggests that the anniversary will not only celebrate political progress, but also invite reflection on how effectively the system has delivered on its promise of representation, accountability, and governance.

As the Islands approach this Golden Jubilee, attention is likely to turn not only to the achievements of ministerial government, but also to the ongoing question of how the system continues to serve a modern and rapidly developing Turks and Caicos Islands.

Developed by Deandrea Hamilton • with ChatGPT (AI) • edited by Magnetic Media.

Continue Reading

News

Government Moves to Amend Destination Management Fee Law

Published

on

Turks and Caicos, March 30, 2026 – The Turks and Caicos Islands Government has signaled changes to its tourism funding framework, with Cabinet approving draft amendments to the Destination Management Fee Act 2023.

The decision was confirmed in the Post Cabinet statement following the February 5 meeting, chaired by Governor Dileeni Daniel-Selvaratnam, where members agreed to move forward with revisions to the law governing the collection and administration of the fee.

The Destination Management Fee, introduced in 2023, is applied to travelers entering the country and is embedded within the cost of travel. The charge was designed to support tourism-related development, including marketing, infrastructure, and sustainability initiatives.

At the time of its introduction, the fee was linked to the establishment of a Destination Management and Marketing Organisation (DMMO), which was expected to coordinate tourism strategy and enhance the visitor experience.

However, recent developments have shifted that landscape.

The DMMO has since been discontinued, raising new questions about how funds generated through the fee are being managed and what structure will now guide tourism development efforts.

The Cabinet note does not outline what specific changes are being proposed under the amended legislation.

It also does not indicate whether adjustments will be made to:

  • who pays the fee,
  • how it is collected, or
  • how the revenue is allocated and overseen.

The move to amend the law comes amid broader government efforts to strengthen revenue collection and compliance, including updates provided to Cabinet on the work of the Drag-Net Steering Committee — a multi-agency initiative focused on improving government revenue systems.

The lack of detail surrounding the amendments leaves several key questions unanswered, particularly given the fee’s direct impact on both visitors and residents and its role in supporting the country’s tourism economy.

Any changes to the Act would require further legislative steps, including presentation to the House of Assembly, before taking effect.

For now, the Cabinet’s approval signals that the government is moving to revise a policy that is already in force — but without yet disclosing how those revisions will alter the current system.

As tourism remains the backbone of the Turks and Caicos Islands economy, clarity on the future of the Destination Management Fee — and the framework it supports — is expected to be closely watched in the weeks ahead.

Developed by Deandrea Hamilton • with ChatGPT (AI) • edited by Magnetic Media.

Photo Credit: TCIAA

Continue Reading

FIND US ON FACEBOOK

TRENDING