Connect with us

News

WILKIE ARTHUR now has a Driver’s License; Victory in LANDMARK Civil Case against DMV & AG

Published

on

#TurksandCaicos, August 11, 2023 – Tuesday August 8, 2023 The learned Resident Magistrate, Mrs. Oreika Selver-Gardiner heard by way of evidence in an appeal against a decision of the Director of Motor Vehicles, Wilbur Caley  and the Hon Attorney General Mrs. Rhondalee Braithwaite-Knowles, KC.

The landmark case set a precedent in the Turks and Caicos Islands.  It is also a beacon of hope for those facing similar challenges.  Having heard evidence from Wilke Arthur who took the witness stand first in the trial, as it was his case he brought against the Government agents.

Mr. Arthur on oath testified of being released from His Majesty’s Prison and was refused allowance to renew his license until he had paid back fees for the past 11 years; a period of time when he was serving out a sentence in prison.

Mr. Arthur told the learned Resident Magistrate that he told the Director this was wrong and that he has been through this before but the previous directors waved the fees given the fact that he was incarcerated.

Two civil attorneys, Clemar Hippolyte Principal Senior Crown Counsel and her junior well qualified assistant Tamika Simms-Williams traveled from the Grand Turk’s Attorney General’s Chambers and vigorously challenged Mr. Arthur’s claim in support of the director’s position and decision.

Mr. Arthur, after giving his evidence in chief was cross-examined by the Senior Principal Crown Counsel but he stood his ground well, maintained his position and was unshaken by the cross-examination.

Mr. Arthur called no witnesses on behalf of his case, it was then the Crown’s turn to convince the Hon. learned Resident Magistrate of its position.

They called Mr. Wilbur Caley to the witness stand/box, he testified he was charging back fees for years since  being director.  He further said he doing it because the law speak on renewal of driver’s license being back dated to it’s date of expiration, so that means the fees must be back dated as well.

Crown counsel, Tamika Simms Williams asked him about fees being waived, he said he has never done it.  The director maintained his position in evidence in chief.

He was then subjected to cross-examination  by unrepresented Mr. Arthur. He took him through sections of the ordinance.  The director still tried to maintain his position that he was right and supported by law to be charging people back fees.  Mr. Arthur put it to him forcefully that there’s absolutely no provision in law empowering you to be charging back fees.  Mr. Arthur asked him to show the court one section in the ordinance where it speaks on back fees?  After several attempts for a near hour of cross-examination and reluctance responses, Mr. Caley admitted that there is no section or no provision in the laws governing the Department of Motor Vehicles that speaks specifically of back fees.

One very serious concerning  and highly unethical disturbing observation Mr. Arthur brought to the Court’s attention was that Senior Principal Crown Counsel, Ms. Clemar Hippolyte when Mr. Caley was asked by Mr. Arthur “so you would agree that what you were doing over the years by charging back fees when was a matter of policy and not law?”

Before Mr. Caley could answer the suggestion by Mr. Arthur, Ms. Clemar Hippolyte told him under her breath to say “law.”

Mr. Arthur, in catching the exchange, raised serious issue with the court and complained about how the senior principal Crown Counsel boldly telling the witness how to testify.

Arthur’s account was that, “She began stammering in her response and said I was speaking to my assistant not the witness.”

The learned Resident Magistrate showed concerns and told Ms. Hippolyte that if she’s speaking to her junior counsel, to do it more quietly please.

Having won the case, Mr. Arthur told Magnetic Media that he couldn’t believe for a nation that always speaking on how much we wants to rehabilitate and assist ex-offenders in leading law abiding new lives, he was being forced to pay back fees for the renewal of his driver’s license having been incarcerated for a number of years.

It would have meant hundreds of dollars in cost.

Arthur said, government actions are far from their words and “their public speeches and press releases.”

While Arthur said he found it “very discouraging and troubling”  he would not permit the ordeal to sidetrack him from “going forward positively with the continued help of Almighty God.”

Wilkie Arthur also informs that he now has his driver’s license as immediately following the court decision, he went to the Department of Motor Vehicles, DMV to begin the process of obtaining his renewed driver’s license.

Bahamas News

Mother’s Pride Headlines Bahamian Takeover at Sixers-Heat Clash in Miami

Published

on

The Bahamas, March 30, 2026 – The voice of a proud mother captured the spirit of a nation Monday night, as Bendra Rolle shared heartfelt reflections on the overwhelming Bahamian support for her son, VJ Edgecombe, during the Philadelphia 76ers matchup against the Miami Heat in Miami.

“The patriotic support and scenery at my son, VJ Edgecombe’s NBA game… was overwhelming,” Rolle said in a statement issued following the game. “The arena in Miami was lit. Bimini and the Bahamas showed up and showed out.”

Her words come amid what has already been widely described as a remarkable showing of national pride, with Bahamians traveling in large numbers to South Florida to witness the young guard’s continued rise. For Rolle, however, the moment extended far beyond basketball.

“Beyond VJ’s basketball talents, I’m so moved by his magnetic personality and personal journey to inspire and excite an entire nation—our beloved Bahamas,” she said. “I thank God for VJ’s humility and for his hunger for greatness. He never forgets how far God has brought us.”

While the Sixers did not secure the win on the night, Edgecombe delivered a solid individual performance, finishing with 13 points and five assists. He made an early impact on the game, showing confidence and poise before foul trouble disrupted his rhythm, but still managed to leave his mark in meaningful minutes.

The game itself evolved into a cultural showcase, with Bahamian flags waving throughout the arena and chants ringing out in support of Edgecombe. Much of that presence was bolstered by a coordinated travel push from Bahamasair, which helped facilitate fan travel and added to the electric atmosphere in Miami.

Rolle said the emotional weight of the moment was deeply felt by her family, as they witnessed firsthand the unity and pride of the Bahamian people.

“Thanks and love for the tears and overwhelming joy on Monday, Bahamas,” she expressed. “The Bahamian flags were love, loud, and proud. On my own behalf, VJ, and the entire family, I am ever grateful for the indescribable experience.”

Her closing words underscored what many have described as the true victory of the night—not the final score, but the powerful display of national pride and support surrounding one of The Bahamas’ rising stars.

Continue Reading

News

50 Years of Ministerial Government: Cabinet Moves to Mark Milestone Rooted in 1976 Constitution

Published

on

Turks and Caicos, March 30, 2026 – The Turks and Caicos Islands is preparing to mark a major political milestone, with Cabinet approving the establishment of a National Commemorative Committee to celebrate 50 years of ministerial government, a system first introduced under the 1976 Constitution.

The decision, confirmed in the February 10 Post Cabinet statement, signals a year of reflection on a governance model that fundamentally reshaped how the country is run — shifting from direct colonial administration toward locally led political leadership.

That shift was formalized in the Turks and Caicos Islands Constitution Order 1976, which laid the legal foundation for ministerial government and introduced a structured Executive and Legislative system.

At its core, the 1976 Constitution established an Executive Council, bringing together:

  • a Governor,
  • a Chief Minister elected by members of the Legislative Council,
  • and Ministers appointed to assist in governing the Islands.

A Very Different Government Back Then

If today’s Cabinet feels crowded, the 1976 version would have seemed almost unbelievable. There were just three Ministers serving alongside the Chief Minister — a tight, compact leadership team responsible for the affairs of an entire country. No sprawling list of ministries, no long roster of portfolios — just a handful of individuals carrying the weight of governance.

Becoming a Minister wasn’t a direct vote of the people either. You first had to win a seat in the Legislative Council, and from there, the Chief Minister would recommend who should serve. The Governor then made the appointments. In other words, political trust and alignment mattered just as much as public support — and ultimate authority still rested above the local leadership.

And as for job security? There wasn’t much of it. Ministers served without fixed terms and could be removed if they lost their seat, resigned, or if the Governor revoked their appointment. Even the Chief Minister could be ousted through a vote of no confidence. Add to that the basic requirements — being at least 21, a British subject, and meeting residency rules — and it’s clear that ministerial government in 1976 was not only smaller, but far more tightly controlled.

This marked the first time elected representatives were formally given defined roles in the administration of national affairs.

Under the Constitution, the Governor retained overarching authority, but was required in many instances to act on the advice of the Executive Council, particularly in shaping policy and overseeing government operations.

The Chief Minister, meanwhile, was positioned as the central political leader, responsible for directing government business and advising on the appointment of Ministers.

Importantly, the Constitution also allowed for the assignment of responsibilities to Ministers, giving them oversight of specific areas of government — a structure that remains at the heart of today’s Cabinet system.

Section 13 of the Order made clear that Ministers could be assigned responsibility for the administration of departments or government business, embedding accountability and functional governance into the system.

The Legislative Council, established alongside the Executive, provided the law-making body, with elected and appointed members participating in debates, passing legislation, and representing the interests of the Islands.

Together, these provisions created the framework for what is now recognized as ministerial government — a hybrid system balancing local political leadership with constitutional oversight by the Governor.

The explanatory note of the 1976 Order describes it as introducing “new provisions for the Government of the Turks and Caicos Islands,” including the creation of a Legislative Council with elected members and Ministers appointed on the advice of the Chief Minister.

Fifty years on, that structure has evolved through subsequent constitutional changes, but its foundation remains rooted in the 1976 framework.

Cabinet’s decision to establish a commemorative committee suggests that the anniversary will not only celebrate political progress, but also invite reflection on how effectively the system has delivered on its promise of representation, accountability, and governance.

As the Islands approach this Golden Jubilee, attention is likely to turn not only to the achievements of ministerial government, but also to the ongoing question of how the system continues to serve a modern and rapidly developing Turks and Caicos Islands.

Developed by Deandrea Hamilton • with ChatGPT (AI) • edited by Magnetic Media.

Continue Reading

News

Government Moves to Amend Destination Management Fee Law

Published

on

Turks and Caicos, March 30, 2026 – The Turks and Caicos Islands Government has signaled changes to its tourism funding framework, with Cabinet approving draft amendments to the Destination Management Fee Act 2023.

The decision was confirmed in the Post Cabinet statement following the February 5 meeting, chaired by Governor Dileeni Daniel-Selvaratnam, where members agreed to move forward with revisions to the law governing the collection and administration of the fee.

The Destination Management Fee, introduced in 2023, is applied to travelers entering the country and is embedded within the cost of travel. The charge was designed to support tourism-related development, including marketing, infrastructure, and sustainability initiatives.

At the time of its introduction, the fee was linked to the establishment of a Destination Management and Marketing Organisation (DMMO), which was expected to coordinate tourism strategy and enhance the visitor experience.

However, recent developments have shifted that landscape.

The DMMO has since been discontinued, raising new questions about how funds generated through the fee are being managed and what structure will now guide tourism development efforts.

The Cabinet note does not outline what specific changes are being proposed under the amended legislation.

It also does not indicate whether adjustments will be made to:

  • who pays the fee,
  • how it is collected, or
  • how the revenue is allocated and overseen.

The move to amend the law comes amid broader government efforts to strengthen revenue collection and compliance, including updates provided to Cabinet on the work of the Drag-Net Steering Committee — a multi-agency initiative focused on improving government revenue systems.

The lack of detail surrounding the amendments leaves several key questions unanswered, particularly given the fee’s direct impact on both visitors and residents and its role in supporting the country’s tourism economy.

Any changes to the Act would require further legislative steps, including presentation to the House of Assembly, before taking effect.

For now, the Cabinet’s approval signals that the government is moving to revise a policy that is already in force — but without yet disclosing how those revisions will alter the current system.

As tourism remains the backbone of the Turks and Caicos Islands economy, clarity on the future of the Destination Management Fee — and the framework it supports — is expected to be closely watched in the weeks ahead.

Developed by Deandrea Hamilton • with ChatGPT (AI) • edited by Magnetic Media.

Photo Credit: TCIAA

Continue Reading

FIND US ON FACEBOOK

TRENDING