Connect with us

News

Drivers Want Money Back and demand Probe after DMV Court Ruling 

Published

on

Dana Malcolm 

Staff Writer 

 

 

#TurksandCaicos, August 14, 2023 – A mass of reactions continue to pour in after the verdict in a landmark case that will likely affect how driver’s licenses are distributed in the Turks and Caicos Islands.  Ranging from anger to incredulity to gratitude, residents had a lot to say after Wilkie Arthur, TCI Resident took the DMV and the Attorney General’s Chambers to court following an attempt to force him to pay for 11 years of fees on his unrenewed license.  Those fees were incurred while he was incarcerated and thus had no reason to renew his license.   Arthur won the case.

“This department needs to be investigated.  This department needs to be investigated thoroughly, somebody needs to go in there and see how far back this was done and somebody needs to be held accountable.  I don’t care if it was ten years back.  I don’t care who was in power.  I don’t care who was the director.  This is injustice.”

After publishing the ruling, the Magnetic Media team was inundated with public reaction, which largely expressed outrage at the ‘nonsense’ rule which has been enforced, as being the law, for years.

Some residents pointed out the illogical nature of the rule: “That man didn’t have a car so he was not driving, it’s as simple as that. Why would I renew my driver’s license if I don’t have a car?”, one resident asked.

Another resident agreed that the practice was an undue burden to residents: “Stop trying to kill the poor man.  We don’t have money to back pay for licenses.  If I didn’t have a license for 10 years that means I wasn’t driving.  Now I have a car.  I need my license, what sense is somebody going to renew their license if they don’t have a car? Stupid!”

Others said many had been victims of similar practices: “These are the kinds of things that are happening to us here but we are not as bold – These things are wrong!  It’s treason that’s all I can say– If you’re going to lead a country, don’t bleed it,”  chided one resident.

Another resident celebrated: “These things have been going on for a long time and I am so happy that he (Wilkie) came out and pointed that out for us. Now everybody needs to go get their licenses and they can’t charge you a thing.”

DMV Director Wilbur explained during the hearing that currently TCI laws speak to the renewal of a driver’s license being back-dated to its date of expiration which was interpreted as including the annual fee.  The interpretation of that law has affected Turks and Caicos Islanders for years as residents have found themselves facing large sums for renewal after extended periods, despite having legitimate reasons not to have paid the fees including illness, emigration, lack of a car, etc.

Some residents contended that the interpretation was just that, an interpretation made policy, but not truly law.  Caley eventually admitted that there is no law governing the Department of Motor Vehicles that speaks specifically of back fees.

Residents expressed anger at this and called for criminal charges to be brought, citing all the residents who would have had to pay large amounts of cash over the years.

“How many people have you done this to?” one questioned.  “That’s operating above the law.”

Another chimed in: “All those who have paid money before should request their money back from government.”

“I wish everybody could find their receipts— any department that made them do any back-paying, go and report it and get your money back.”  It was a sentiment repeated by the majority of respondents over and over.

Others cautioned the government not to make the practice into a law and chided them for allowing policies like this to flourish.

“This is all common sense.  You don’t know what’s good for your people or how to help your people or ease up some burdens.  That’s what the people put you there for.”

“I want somebody to send this to the Attorney General’s office, from the top straight down you should be ashamed of yourselves!”, one resident said.

The government has not commented yet on how exactly this will alter how licenses are given out, but the court has made its position known, awarding the case to Arthur who is now going through the process of getting his license.

Bahamas News

Mother’s Pride Headlines Bahamian Takeover at Sixers-Heat Clash in Miami

Published

on

The Bahamas, March 30, 2026 – The voice of a proud mother captured the spirit of a nation Monday night, as Bendra Rolle shared heartfelt reflections on the overwhelming Bahamian support for her son, VJ Edgecombe, during the Philadelphia 76ers matchup against the Miami Heat in Miami.

“The patriotic support and scenery at my son, VJ Edgecombe’s NBA game… was overwhelming,” Rolle said in a statement issued following the game. “The arena in Miami was lit. Bimini and the Bahamas showed up and showed out.”

Her words come amid what has already been widely described as a remarkable showing of national pride, with Bahamians traveling in large numbers to South Florida to witness the young guard’s continued rise. For Rolle, however, the moment extended far beyond basketball.

“Beyond VJ’s basketball talents, I’m so moved by his magnetic personality and personal journey to inspire and excite an entire nation—our beloved Bahamas,” she said. “I thank God for VJ’s humility and for his hunger for greatness. He never forgets how far God has brought us.”

While the Sixers did not secure the win on the night, Edgecombe delivered a solid individual performance, finishing with 13 points and five assists. He made an early impact on the game, showing confidence and poise before foul trouble disrupted his rhythm, but still managed to leave his mark in meaningful minutes.

The game itself evolved into a cultural showcase, with Bahamian flags waving throughout the arena and chants ringing out in support of Edgecombe. Much of that presence was bolstered by a coordinated travel push from Bahamasair, which helped facilitate fan travel and added to the electric atmosphere in Miami.

Rolle said the emotional weight of the moment was deeply felt by her family, as they witnessed firsthand the unity and pride of the Bahamian people.

“Thanks and love for the tears and overwhelming joy on Monday, Bahamas,” she expressed. “The Bahamian flags were love, loud, and proud. On my own behalf, VJ, and the entire family, I am ever grateful for the indescribable experience.”

Her closing words underscored what many have described as the true victory of the night—not the final score, but the powerful display of national pride and support surrounding one of The Bahamas’ rising stars.

Continue Reading

News

50 Years of Ministerial Government: Cabinet Moves to Mark Milestone Rooted in 1976 Constitution

Published

on

Turks and Caicos, March 30, 2026 – The Turks and Caicos Islands is preparing to mark a major political milestone, with Cabinet approving the establishment of a National Commemorative Committee to celebrate 50 years of ministerial government, a system first introduced under the 1976 Constitution.

The decision, confirmed in the February 10 Post Cabinet statement, signals a year of reflection on a governance model that fundamentally reshaped how the country is run — shifting from direct colonial administration toward locally led political leadership.

That shift was formalized in the Turks and Caicos Islands Constitution Order 1976, which laid the legal foundation for ministerial government and introduced a structured Executive and Legislative system.

At its core, the 1976 Constitution established an Executive Council, bringing together:

  • a Governor,
  • a Chief Minister elected by members of the Legislative Council,
  • and Ministers appointed to assist in governing the Islands.

A Very Different Government Back Then

If today’s Cabinet feels crowded, the 1976 version would have seemed almost unbelievable. There were just three Ministers serving alongside the Chief Minister — a tight, compact leadership team responsible for the affairs of an entire country. No sprawling list of ministries, no long roster of portfolios — just a handful of individuals carrying the weight of governance.

Becoming a Minister wasn’t a direct vote of the people either. You first had to win a seat in the Legislative Council, and from there, the Chief Minister would recommend who should serve. The Governor then made the appointments. In other words, political trust and alignment mattered just as much as public support — and ultimate authority still rested above the local leadership.

And as for job security? There wasn’t much of it. Ministers served without fixed terms and could be removed if they lost their seat, resigned, or if the Governor revoked their appointment. Even the Chief Minister could be ousted through a vote of no confidence. Add to that the basic requirements — being at least 21, a British subject, and meeting residency rules — and it’s clear that ministerial government in 1976 was not only smaller, but far more tightly controlled.

This marked the first time elected representatives were formally given defined roles in the administration of national affairs.

Under the Constitution, the Governor retained overarching authority, but was required in many instances to act on the advice of the Executive Council, particularly in shaping policy and overseeing government operations.

The Chief Minister, meanwhile, was positioned as the central political leader, responsible for directing government business and advising on the appointment of Ministers.

Importantly, the Constitution also allowed for the assignment of responsibilities to Ministers, giving them oversight of specific areas of government — a structure that remains at the heart of today’s Cabinet system.

Section 13 of the Order made clear that Ministers could be assigned responsibility for the administration of departments or government business, embedding accountability and functional governance into the system.

The Legislative Council, established alongside the Executive, provided the law-making body, with elected and appointed members participating in debates, passing legislation, and representing the interests of the Islands.

Together, these provisions created the framework for what is now recognized as ministerial government — a hybrid system balancing local political leadership with constitutional oversight by the Governor.

The explanatory note of the 1976 Order describes it as introducing “new provisions for the Government of the Turks and Caicos Islands,” including the creation of a Legislative Council with elected members and Ministers appointed on the advice of the Chief Minister.

Fifty years on, that structure has evolved through subsequent constitutional changes, but its foundation remains rooted in the 1976 framework.

Cabinet’s decision to establish a commemorative committee suggests that the anniversary will not only celebrate political progress, but also invite reflection on how effectively the system has delivered on its promise of representation, accountability, and governance.

As the Islands approach this Golden Jubilee, attention is likely to turn not only to the achievements of ministerial government, but also to the ongoing question of how the system continues to serve a modern and rapidly developing Turks and Caicos Islands.

Developed by Deandrea Hamilton • with ChatGPT (AI) • edited by Magnetic Media.

Continue Reading

News

Government Moves to Amend Destination Management Fee Law

Published

on

Turks and Caicos, March 30, 2026 – The Turks and Caicos Islands Government has signaled changes to its tourism funding framework, with Cabinet approving draft amendments to the Destination Management Fee Act 2023.

The decision was confirmed in the Post Cabinet statement following the February 5 meeting, chaired by Governor Dileeni Daniel-Selvaratnam, where members agreed to move forward with revisions to the law governing the collection and administration of the fee.

The Destination Management Fee, introduced in 2023, is applied to travelers entering the country and is embedded within the cost of travel. The charge was designed to support tourism-related development, including marketing, infrastructure, and sustainability initiatives.

At the time of its introduction, the fee was linked to the establishment of a Destination Management and Marketing Organisation (DMMO), which was expected to coordinate tourism strategy and enhance the visitor experience.

However, recent developments have shifted that landscape.

The DMMO has since been discontinued, raising new questions about how funds generated through the fee are being managed and what structure will now guide tourism development efforts.

The Cabinet note does not outline what specific changes are being proposed under the amended legislation.

It also does not indicate whether adjustments will be made to:

  • who pays the fee,
  • how it is collected, or
  • how the revenue is allocated and overseen.

The move to amend the law comes amid broader government efforts to strengthen revenue collection and compliance, including updates provided to Cabinet on the work of the Drag-Net Steering Committee — a multi-agency initiative focused on improving government revenue systems.

The lack of detail surrounding the amendments leaves several key questions unanswered, particularly given the fee’s direct impact on both visitors and residents and its role in supporting the country’s tourism economy.

Any changes to the Act would require further legislative steps, including presentation to the House of Assembly, before taking effect.

For now, the Cabinet’s approval signals that the government is moving to revise a policy that is already in force — but without yet disclosing how those revisions will alter the current system.

As tourism remains the backbone of the Turks and Caicos Islands economy, clarity on the future of the Destination Management Fee — and the framework it supports — is expected to be closely watched in the weeks ahead.

Developed by Deandrea Hamilton • with ChatGPT (AI) • edited by Magnetic Media.

Photo Credit: TCIAA

Continue Reading

FIND US ON FACEBOOK

TRENDING