Connect with us

News

Bishop Clarence Williams Re-Trial for Alleged Sexual Assault, begins

Published

on

By Wilkie Arthur

Freelance Court Reporter

 

 

 

#TurksandCaicos, June 29, 2023 – Having being convicted and sentenced since February 24, 2022, Clarence Williams, who was found guilty of Indecent  Assault of a male after a trial by jury before Her Ladyship Justice Tanya Lobban-Jackson, the former church bishop is getting his new trial and it may include a new charge for possible conviction.

Williams had been sentenced to 18 months imprisonment; suspended from church work for two years and made the subject of a Sexual Harm Prevention Order. The indictment had contained two counts, but the jury could not agree on count two and were discharged from reaching a verdict in respect of that count.

In the Supreme Court on Friday 23rd June 2023 before newly appointed Judge to the TCI high court bench, his lordship Mr. Chris Selochan, the crown led by King’s Counsel Mr. Andrew Mitchell and assisted by Ms. Tamika Grant, told the court that at the re-trial it is the Crown’s intention to apply to the court to reinstate the count that the jury was not able to reach a verdict on in the first trial.

The Court of Appeal, had quashed the conviction, also discharging the sentenced and calling for a retrial in the matter in the Interest Of Justice.

Counsel for the defendant strongly petitioned the court to consider his client’s age, 77 (at the time), his resignation from all duties within the church and his possible ill health, that there should be no retrial.

The Court of Appeal resisted the submission and ordered a retrial of Clarence Wiliams.

It was between September and November of 2017, the complainant Jeff Josue Saunders was riding his bicycle in Five Cays. He stopped for a rest near to the entrance that leads to the Church of God Prophecy.  There he met Bishop Clarence Williams.  The accused was a Bishop of the said church.  The accused was sitting in his car and a conversation ensued, during which the Bishop Williams invited Saunders to his office to collect $6 for lunch. Saunders accepted and later in the day he rode his bicycle to the Bishop’s office.  There the Bishop told Saunders that he was sweaty, smelt badly and invited him to use the bathroom facility at the office.  The appellant led Saunders to his sink and took a cloth/flannel from the shower nearby and proceeded to wash Saunders’ body eventually making his way to his genitalia, under the pretext that he was teaching Saunders personal hygiene.

The only other relevant matter was that Saunders was a Paranoid Schizophrenic.

The Bishop admitted that the encounter occurred, but alleged that the bathroom incident was a total fabrication.

At the appeal hearing Bishop Williams’ King’s Counsel attorney Mr. Jerome Lynch assisted by Mr. Mark Fulford, submitted that the learned trial judge erred in failing to safeguard the appellant’s right to a fair trial by refusing to sanction the Crown’s use of material that was undisclosed and should not have been put in cross-examination, by discharging the jury or at the very least telling the jury to disregard the questions as they should not have been suggested and as there was no evidence to support them.

And similarly to warn them again in her summing-up.

Counsel for the respondent admitted that prosecuting counsel did not give the defence advance disclosure of the challenged questions, but denied that the non-disclosure amounted to a material irregularity which rendered the conviction unsafe.

Counsel for the appellant submitted that two questions which were put to the appellant during cross examination by prosecuting counsel Mr. Oliver Smith, KC were improper.

The first question, prosecuting counsel put to the appellant was that he and his wife had been estranged for 20 years. Counsel submitted that was untrue and not predicated on any disclosure relating to antecedents.  In the course of giving his evidence the appellant had spoken of not being aware of any complaints of a similar nature being made against him.

The second question prosecuting counsel asked was:

“Q. Weren’t you thrown out of your house by your wife for allegations of sexual abuse of other male — men?

  1. Definitely not, says the Bishop.

The court of appeal heard Bishop’s appeal on JANUARY 23, 2023 and delivered it’s decision on FEBRUARY 8, 2023.

The appeal was Heard Before:  The Honourable Mr. Justice K. Neville Adderley – President Ag; The Honourable Mr. Justice Stanley John – Justice of Appeal; The Honourable Mr. Justice Sir Ian Winder – Justice of Appeal; *Appearances and representation were by: Mr. Jerome Lynch KC and Mr. Mark Fulford For the Appellant.

Mr. Oliver Smith KC and Ms. Tamika Grant For the Respondent, February 24, 2022

Friday’s hearing (23rd June, 2023) Bishop Williams’ counsels were Mr. Jerome Lynch KC and Ms. Sheena Mair.

The matter was adjourned to various different dates in July, potentially August, as well as dates in September for counsels from both sides to submit applications and responses to February 24, 2022 applications and submissions.

Bishop was released on self -signed bail until his new trial, if dates and counsels are available in September.

Bahamas News

Mother’s Pride Headlines Bahamian Takeover at Sixers-Heat Clash in Miami

Published

on

The Bahamas, March 30, 2026 – The voice of a proud mother captured the spirit of a nation Monday night, as Bendra Rolle shared heartfelt reflections on the overwhelming Bahamian support for her son, VJ Edgecombe, during the Philadelphia 76ers matchup against the Miami Heat in Miami.

“The patriotic support and scenery at my son, VJ Edgecombe’s NBA game… was overwhelming,” Rolle said in a statement issued following the game. “The arena in Miami was lit. Bimini and the Bahamas showed up and showed out.”

Her words come amid what has already been widely described as a remarkable showing of national pride, with Bahamians traveling in large numbers to South Florida to witness the young guard’s continued rise. For Rolle, however, the moment extended far beyond basketball.

“Beyond VJ’s basketball talents, I’m so moved by his magnetic personality and personal journey to inspire and excite an entire nation—our beloved Bahamas,” she said. “I thank God for VJ’s humility and for his hunger for greatness. He never forgets how far God has brought us.”

While the Sixers did not secure the win on the night, Edgecombe delivered a solid individual performance, finishing with 13 points and five assists. He made an early impact on the game, showing confidence and poise before foul trouble disrupted his rhythm, but still managed to leave his mark in meaningful minutes.

The game itself evolved into a cultural showcase, with Bahamian flags waving throughout the arena and chants ringing out in support of Edgecombe. Much of that presence was bolstered by a coordinated travel push from Bahamasair, which helped facilitate fan travel and added to the electric atmosphere in Miami.

Rolle said the emotional weight of the moment was deeply felt by her family, as they witnessed firsthand the unity and pride of the Bahamian people.

“Thanks and love for the tears and overwhelming joy on Monday, Bahamas,” she expressed. “The Bahamian flags were love, loud, and proud. On my own behalf, VJ, and the entire family, I am ever grateful for the indescribable experience.”

Her closing words underscored what many have described as the true victory of the night—not the final score, but the powerful display of national pride and support surrounding one of The Bahamas’ rising stars.

Continue Reading

News

50 Years of Ministerial Government: Cabinet Moves to Mark Milestone Rooted in 1976 Constitution

Published

on

Turks and Caicos, March 30, 2026 – The Turks and Caicos Islands is preparing to mark a major political milestone, with Cabinet approving the establishment of a National Commemorative Committee to celebrate 50 years of ministerial government, a system first introduced under the 1976 Constitution.

The decision, confirmed in the February 10 Post Cabinet statement, signals a year of reflection on a governance model that fundamentally reshaped how the country is run — shifting from direct colonial administration toward locally led political leadership.

That shift was formalized in the Turks and Caicos Islands Constitution Order 1976, which laid the legal foundation for ministerial government and introduced a structured Executive and Legislative system.

At its core, the 1976 Constitution established an Executive Council, bringing together:

  • a Governor,
  • a Chief Minister elected by members of the Legislative Council,
  • and Ministers appointed to assist in governing the Islands.

A Very Different Government Back Then

If today’s Cabinet feels crowded, the 1976 version would have seemed almost unbelievable. There were just three Ministers serving alongside the Chief Minister — a tight, compact leadership team responsible for the affairs of an entire country. No sprawling list of ministries, no long roster of portfolios — just a handful of individuals carrying the weight of governance.

Becoming a Minister wasn’t a direct vote of the people either. You first had to win a seat in the Legislative Council, and from there, the Chief Minister would recommend who should serve. The Governor then made the appointments. In other words, political trust and alignment mattered just as much as public support — and ultimate authority still rested above the local leadership.

And as for job security? There wasn’t much of it. Ministers served without fixed terms and could be removed if they lost their seat, resigned, or if the Governor revoked their appointment. Even the Chief Minister could be ousted through a vote of no confidence. Add to that the basic requirements — being at least 21, a British subject, and meeting residency rules — and it’s clear that ministerial government in 1976 was not only smaller, but far more tightly controlled.

This marked the first time elected representatives were formally given defined roles in the administration of national affairs.

Under the Constitution, the Governor retained overarching authority, but was required in many instances to act on the advice of the Executive Council, particularly in shaping policy and overseeing government operations.

The Chief Minister, meanwhile, was positioned as the central political leader, responsible for directing government business and advising on the appointment of Ministers.

Importantly, the Constitution also allowed for the assignment of responsibilities to Ministers, giving them oversight of specific areas of government — a structure that remains at the heart of today’s Cabinet system.

Section 13 of the Order made clear that Ministers could be assigned responsibility for the administration of departments or government business, embedding accountability and functional governance into the system.

The Legislative Council, established alongside the Executive, provided the law-making body, with elected and appointed members participating in debates, passing legislation, and representing the interests of the Islands.

Together, these provisions created the framework for what is now recognized as ministerial government — a hybrid system balancing local political leadership with constitutional oversight by the Governor.

The explanatory note of the 1976 Order describes it as introducing “new provisions for the Government of the Turks and Caicos Islands,” including the creation of a Legislative Council with elected members and Ministers appointed on the advice of the Chief Minister.

Fifty years on, that structure has evolved through subsequent constitutional changes, but its foundation remains rooted in the 1976 framework.

Cabinet’s decision to establish a commemorative committee suggests that the anniversary will not only celebrate political progress, but also invite reflection on how effectively the system has delivered on its promise of representation, accountability, and governance.

As the Islands approach this Golden Jubilee, attention is likely to turn not only to the achievements of ministerial government, but also to the ongoing question of how the system continues to serve a modern and rapidly developing Turks and Caicos Islands.

Developed by Deandrea Hamilton • with ChatGPT (AI) • edited by Magnetic Media.

Continue Reading

News

Government Moves to Amend Destination Management Fee Law

Published

on

Turks and Caicos, March 30, 2026 – The Turks and Caicos Islands Government has signaled changes to its tourism funding framework, with Cabinet approving draft amendments to the Destination Management Fee Act 2023.

The decision was confirmed in the Post Cabinet statement following the February 5 meeting, chaired by Governor Dileeni Daniel-Selvaratnam, where members agreed to move forward with revisions to the law governing the collection and administration of the fee.

The Destination Management Fee, introduced in 2023, is applied to travelers entering the country and is embedded within the cost of travel. The charge was designed to support tourism-related development, including marketing, infrastructure, and sustainability initiatives.

At the time of its introduction, the fee was linked to the establishment of a Destination Management and Marketing Organisation (DMMO), which was expected to coordinate tourism strategy and enhance the visitor experience.

However, recent developments have shifted that landscape.

The DMMO has since been discontinued, raising new questions about how funds generated through the fee are being managed and what structure will now guide tourism development efforts.

The Cabinet note does not outline what specific changes are being proposed under the amended legislation.

It also does not indicate whether adjustments will be made to:

  • who pays the fee,
  • how it is collected, or
  • how the revenue is allocated and overseen.

The move to amend the law comes amid broader government efforts to strengthen revenue collection and compliance, including updates provided to Cabinet on the work of the Drag-Net Steering Committee — a multi-agency initiative focused on improving government revenue systems.

The lack of detail surrounding the amendments leaves several key questions unanswered, particularly given the fee’s direct impact on both visitors and residents and its role in supporting the country’s tourism economy.

Any changes to the Act would require further legislative steps, including presentation to the House of Assembly, before taking effect.

For now, the Cabinet’s approval signals that the government is moving to revise a policy that is already in force — but without yet disclosing how those revisions will alter the current system.

As tourism remains the backbone of the Turks and Caicos Islands economy, clarity on the future of the Destination Management Fee — and the framework it supports — is expected to be closely watched in the weeks ahead.

Developed by Deandrea Hamilton • with ChatGPT (AI) • edited by Magnetic Media.

Photo Credit: TCIAA

Continue Reading

FIND US ON FACEBOOK

TRENDING