An Editorial by Dr. Alicia Swann

In the days following our most recent national celebration, I have observed conversations filled with strong opinions and emotions. Some have expressed pride and gratitude, while others have questioned our flag, Constitution, identity, political system and future.

After listening, I feel compelled to share my thoughts—not to dismiss anyone’s feelings or deepen division, but to offer historical clarity and, most importantly, hope.

The concerns of Turks and Caicos Islanders are valid. Many are worried about the protection of our land and identity, opportunities for our children and whether our people will continue to have a meaningful place in the country our ancestors built. These concerns deserve honest discussion, factual information, prayerful reflection and responsible planning.

However, as the Turks and Caicos Islands commemorates fifty years of Ministerial Government and celebrates National Flag Day, we must remember that this occasion is not about the current administration, one political party or any individual leader.

Governments come and go, but the story of a people remains.

This celebration belongs to our ancestors—the true visionaries, pioneers and nation-builders who paved the way for us. It belongs to the salt rakers who laboured beneath the blazing sun, the fishermen who braved dangerous seas, the farmers, teachers, mothers, pastors and citizens who built communities and demanded a voice in their homeland.

Many never lived to enjoy the progress their sacrifices helped to create. Yet because they endured, we inherited a country filled with possibilities.

A Political Journey That Began Long Before 1976

Long before European colonisation, these islands were inhabited by the Lucayan-Taíno people. Following European arrival, Indigenous communities suffered enslavement, forced removal and disease.

From the seventeenth century, Bermudian salt rakers developed our natural salt ponds. Enslaved Africans provided much of the labour sustaining the salt and plantation economies, and their descendants became central to the formation of the Turks and Caicos Islander people.

Britain’s influence developed through colonial expansion and competition with Spain and France. At different stages, the islands were administered through The Bahamas and Jamaica.

Dissatisfaction with decisions made under Bahamian administration contributed to our separation from The Bahamas in 1848 and the establishment of a local Legislative Board. In 1873, TCI became a dependency of the British colony of Jamaica. Local elections were abolished and were not restored until the 1959 Constitution—approximately eighty-six years later.

When Jamaica gained independence in 1962, TCI remained under Britain. From 1965 until Bahamian independence in 1973, the Governor of The Bahamas also served as Governor of TCI. We then received our own resident Governor and continued our constitutional journey.

Haiti never governed the Turks and Caicos Islands, but it holds an important place in our regional history. Following its independence in 1804, Haiti became a powerful symbol of freedom from slavery. Historical records indicate that enslaved people escaped from these islands to freedom in Haiti during the 1820s. In later generations, Haitians, Jamaicans, Bahamians and other Caribbean people contributed to our churches, public service, construction, education, hospitality and economy.

Our history is connected to the wider Caribbean, but our identity remains distinctly Turks and Caicos Islander.

The Significance of 1976

The 1976 Constitution provided for a Chief Minister and other Ministers with responsibility for important areas of government. The Honourable James Alexander George Smith “JAGS” McCartney became our first Chief Minister.

JAGS represented more than a political party. He represented a national awakening—the belief that Turks and Caicos Islanders deserved dignity, representation and a meaningful voice in the management of their homeland.

Ministerial Government was not the achievement of one person alone. It was made possible by generations of representatives, civil servants, community organisers, clergy, educators, workers and citizens who believed our people were capable of shaping their destiny.

The fifty years that followed were not without difficulty. We experienced controversy, constitutional change and interruptions to elected government. Yet representative government returned, our institutions developed and our people continued moving forward.

This anniversary does not suggest that everything has been perfect. It demonstrates that our democracy and our people have endured.

Never Forget Our Resilience

Our ancestors survived slavery, colonial administration, poverty, migration, isolation, political interruption and devastating hurricanes. From an economy once dependent upon salt, sisal and fishing, we built one of the world’s most recognised tourism destinations.

Generations of Turks and Caicos Islanders travelled to neighbouring countries seeking opportunities unavailable at home. Some were not always welcomed or treated as equals. Today, people from many of those same countries come to our shores hoping to work, live and create better futures.

This should not inspire hatred or prejudice. Those who come lawfully and contribute positively deserve dignity and respect. However, it should remind us how far we have come and why we must never surrender our identity or rightful place within our country.

Hospitality and patriotism are not opposites. We can welcome others without losing ourselves.

Scripture reminds us:

“But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith.”
—1 Timothy 5:8

Caring for our own does not mean mistreating others. It means ensuring that Turks and Caicos Islanders are educated, protected and empowered to participate meaningfully in the development of their homeland.

Government has an important responsibility, but nation-building requires more than government. Parents must teach our values, businesses must create opportunities, citizens must respect the law and young people must prepare themselves to lead.

Pride in Where We Are

Until such time as we become an independent and sovereign nation, we must thank God for where we are today.

There is nothing wrong with celebrating our constitutional progress, embracing our present flag or respecting our existing institutions. Doing so does not prevent us from desiring further advancement.

We cannot know where we are going unless we understand where we are now and how we arrived here. Our present flag represents our identity, history and constitutional relationship with Britain. It should be treated with dignity and respect.

Embracing the present is not abandoning the future; it is the pathway towards building it. We celebrate not because the journey is complete, but because God has brought us a mighty long way.

Passports, Citizenship and Our Future

Today, we remain a British Overseas Territory. Although the passport associated with our territory may identify the Turks and Caicos Islands, it is not a sovereign TCI passport issued under the authority of an independent Turks and Caicos nation. It exists within the British nationality system and derives its legal authority from the United Kingdom.

British Overseas Territories citizenship, British citizenship and Turks and Caicos Islander status are connected but legally distinct. None presently represents citizenship issued by a sovereign TCI nation.

This should not cause us to disrespect the passport or constitutional position we hold. Instead, it should encourage us to think responsibly about our future.

If we envision sovereignty, we must eventually determine who would become a citizen of an independent TCI, whether dual citizenship would be permitted and what rights and responsibilities citizenship would carry. We must also consider how to protect our limited land, create pathways to ownership and help Islanders build generational wealth.

Our immigration system must welcome lawful contribution and respect human dignity while protecting the country’s long-term interests and enforcing its laws fairly.

These complex questions must not be decided through hostility, secrecy, political favour or temporary emotion. They require public education, research and consultation involving every inhabited island, our diaspora, elders, young people, churches, businesses, experts, Parliament, relevant institutions and the United Kingdom Government.

After proper preparation and national consultation, the people—not merely a government—should ultimately determine our political future through a clear and credible referendum.

Preparing for Our Destiny

I envision a future in which the Turks and Caicos Islands advances beyond its present constitutional position, governs its own destiny and may one day raise the sovereign flag of an independent nation.

Is it possible? Yes.

Would it require sacrifice, disciplined planning and strong institutions? Absolutely.

Would it require God-fearing leaders with integrity who place the country above personal and political interests? Without question.

“When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn.”
—Proverbs 29:2

Independence without integrity would merely replace one form of dependency with another. Sovereignty must be supported by ethical leadership, economic stability, an independent judiciary, effective border protection, disaster preparedness and an educated population.

Preparation does not mean declaring independence tomorrow. It means beginning the research, civic education, institution-building and national consultation today.

“Write the vision, and make it plain upon tables, that he may run that readeth it.”
—Habakkuk 2:2

Preparing the Next Generation

We must ensure that our children know the history of the Turks and Caicos Islands and understand the sacrifices that paved the way for them.

A generation that does not know its history may inherit a country without understanding its value.

Our history must be taught in our homes, schools, churches and communities. Our children should never have to depend entirely upon outsiders to explain who they are or where they came from.

We must also stop gatekeeping knowledge. Whatever wisdom, education, experience or influence God has given us was not given for our benefit alone. It was entrusted to us so that we may mentor and guide those coming behind us.

True leadership does not conceal knowledge to protect a position. It shares knowledge to prepare a successor.

Let us give our children more than possessions. Let us give them identity, history, wisdom, confidence and a country they are prepared to protect and lead.

We Have What It Takes

We are a small country, but smallness does not mean incapability. Our ancestors created communities with almost nothing and survived circumstances far more difficult than those we face today.

We can honour our present flag without surrendering our future. We can welcome others without losing ourselves. We can celebrate how far we have come while preparing responsibly for where we wish to go.

This is the true meaning of the anniversary: a celebration of our ancestors, constitutional progress, national resilience and continuing right to determine our destiny.

Our ancestors paved the way. We must now possess the courage, discipline, unity and faith to continue the journey.

Dr. Alicia Swann
Proud Turks and Caicos Islander, Civic Leader and Advocate

Providenciales, Turks and Caicos Islands: The Department of Education, through its Curriculum Development Unit, successfully concluded a four-day TCI National Standards Secondary School Curriculum Implementation Training, bringing together secondary school teachers, curriculum officers, education officials, facilitators and key stakeholders in preparation for the piloting of the Turks and Caicos Islands’ draft national secondary curricula.

The training focused on Social Studies, Mathematics, English Language and General Science. Teachers explored the draft curricula, learning objectives, content, instructional approaches and assessment expectations, while considering how the standards can be translated into meaningful classroom practice. The curricula are grounded in research, educational data, national priorities, comparative curriculum analysis and the distinctive context of the Turks and Caicos Islands.

The Honourable Rachel Taylor, Minister of Education, Youth, Sports and Culture, commended Mrs Cleon Astwood, Head of the Curriculum Development Unit, and her team for their dedication and the significant progress made in developing the National Standards Curricula for secondary education. She also recognised the invaluable contribution of educators across the Turks and Caicos Islands, whose professional expertise, classroom experience, and feedback are essential to ensuring that the curricula are relevant, responsive, and aligned with the evolving needs of TCI learners.

“The development of our National Standards Curricula is an important investment in the future of our children and, ultimately, in the future of the Turks and Caicos Islands. Education must continue to evolve to meet the changing needs of our learners, our society, and our economy. Our teachers are at the heart of this process. Their knowledge, professional experience, and insight from the classroom are critical to ensuring that the curricula we develop are academically sound, relevant to our local context, and practical to implement. I commend our Curriculum Development Unit and our educators for the tremendous work being undertaken and for their continued commitment to strengthening the quality of education we provide to every child in the Turks and Caicos Islands.”

Educators were also addressed by Mr James Astwood, Permanent Secretary; Mr Mark Garland, Director of Education; and Ms Elisann Delancy, Deputy Director of Education, who emphasised embracing change, professional collaboration and continuous improvement.

A central focus of the training was the role teachers will play during the pilot phase. Teachers were encouraged to critically engage with the draft documents, paying attention to the clarity and appropriateness of objectives, sequencing and progression, instructional time, resources, gaps, omissions and areas requiring clarification or revision. Their classroom experiences and documented feedback will help strengthen the curricula before finalisation and national implementation.

The Social Studies session also emphasised Local Studies. A panel featuring Mrs Lisa Talbot of the Turks and Caicos National Museum, Dr Carlton Mills, Mrs Joan Astwood-Sutton and Ms Cynclair Musgrove provided historical and cultural perspectives to support accurate, culturally relevant classroom instruction.

Mrs Cleon Astwood noted: “Curriculum development cannot take place in isolation from the teachers who will ultimately bring these documents to life. As they pilot these documents, we expect them to question, test, reflect and provide meaningful feedback. Constructive professional dialogue is necessary if we are to produce strong, relevant curricula that genuinely meet the needs of our students and our education system.”

With the training concluded, participating teachers will now implement and evaluate the draft curricula in authentic classroom settings, document strengths and challenges, and submit recommendations to the Curriculum Development Unit. The Department of Education extends its appreciation to all teachers, school leaders, facilitators, historians, stakeholders and Ministry and Department officials who contributed to the successful four-day exercise.

Turks and Caicos, September 11, 2026 – Fewer than 40 days may remain before InterHealth Canada’s reported 90-day handover period expires, yet the Turks and Caicos Islands Government has not publicly identified those steering the hospitals through the transition—or disclosed their mandate, deadlines and work programme.

The September 8 Speech from the Throne offered confirmation that a body exists: “A Joint Transition Committee of Government and Inter-Health has been formed to manage the handover.”

Government acknowledged the gravity of what comes next, declaring: “The immediate duty is clear. Clinical care and facilities services must continue without interruption while successor arrangements are put in place.”

It went further, promising: “Staffing, essential works, critical supplies and interim funding will be handled so that patients are protected during the transition from one contract to the next.”

Opposition Leader Douglas Parnell said the committee was expected to include six representatives from TCIG and six from InterHealth Canada. He claimed the names had been identified, but that the committee had not held its first meeting and no transition agreement had been executed. Parnell demanded publication of its membership, appointments, first meeting date and work programme.

Those claims have not been independently confirmed, but the Throne Speech did not answer them. It declared the committee formed without naming its chair or members, explaining its authority, confirming whether it has met, or setting measurable deadlines.

The distinction is critical. The hospitals are national assets; what is in question is who will deliver and manage the clinical and facilities services now contracted through InterHealth Canada when the arrangement ends.

Health Minister Kyle Knowles has insisted patient care will continue, saying: “We are working diligently to bring closure to this matter,” and maintaining that government can manage the process.

The Throne Speech itself framed the stakes plainly: “The people must be able to reach a hospital they can trust, at a price the country can sustain.”

Government also announced that “A Health Services Authority will be established to oversee primary, secondary and some tertiary level care,” but that authority is still to be established. The longer-term vision, according to the Speech, is “improved local capacity, prevention, transparent provider arrangements, responsible financial control and a workforce equal to the task.”

With the reported October 18 deadline approaching, assurances are no longer enough. The public needs to know who is managing the transition, what they must deliver, when each safeguard must be completed and what contingency exists if a successor arrangement is not ready.

A committee cannot inspire confidence while its composition and work remain invisible.